D
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
F
Frank Bohan
default said:
My copy is called Binary News READER (or has the Grim Reaper come at last?)
===
Frank Bohan
¶ Pangram: Jeb quickly drove a few extra miles on the glazed pavement.
A
Anonymous
My copy is called Binary News READER (or has the Grim Reaper come at last?)
===
Frank Bohan
¶ Pangram: Jeb quickly drove a few extra miles on the glazed pavement.
The original BNR1 was Binary News Reader. BNR2 was then released as Binary News REAPER as it
"reaps" binaries from the UseNet. It is on the front page of the website.
F
Frank Bohan
Anonymous said:The original BNR1 was Binary News Reader. BNR2 was then released as
Binary News REAPER as it
"reaps" binaries from the UseNet. It is on the front page of the website.
My apologies for thinking the name was wrong -- I'll have to consider
upgrading my copy.
===
Frank Bohan
¶ Wisdom consists of knowing when to avoid perfection
A
A.Melon
The original BNR1 was Binary News Reader. BNR2 was then released as
Binary News REAPER as it
"reaps" binaries from the UseNet. It is on the front page of the website.
My apologies for thinking the name was wrong -- I'll have to consider
upgrading my copy.
===
Frank Bohan
¶ Wisdom consists of knowing when to avoid perfection[/QUOTE]
You really should - BNR2 leaves BNR1 for dead when it comes to features. I've been using it for
2 years now. The only reason I haven't looked at BNR3 yet is that my PC doesn't appear to be
powerful enough for it according to feedback (but I'm getting a new one next week - YIPPEE!!!).
D
default
My apologies for thinking the name was wrong -- I'll have to consider
upgrading my copy.
===
Frank Bohan
¶ Wisdom consists of knowing when to avoid perfection
You really should - BNR2 leaves BNR1 for dead when it comes to features. I've been using it for
2 years now. The only reason I haven't looked at BNR3 yet is that my PC doesn't appear to be
powerful enough for it according to feedback (but I'm getting a new one next week - YIPPEE!!!).
[/QUOTE]
I'm using BNR 3 on a 333 MHZ Celeron II, with 320 MB RAM with no
problems. In fact, I see little difference between 2 and 3 . . .
I never used BNR1, but isn't it more optimized for text messages?
T
Tarkus
I never used BNR1, but isn't it more optimized for text messages?
No, it's always been geared towards binaries, hence the name. If
anything, it handles text messages better now, but that's not its
purpose.
B
/betty/
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:25:49 -0800 (PST), A.Melon used lines to assert:
[F-up set]
While you're at it, feel free to upgrade to a posting client that
supports standard line length settings and is capable of sending a
Lines: n header.
[F-up set]
2 years now. The only reason I haven't looked at BNR3 yet is that my PC doesn't appear to be
powerful enough for it according to feedback (but I'm getting a new one next week - YIPPEE!!!).
While you're at it, feel free to upgrade to a posting client that
supports standard line length settings and is capable of sending a
Lines: n header.