P
Peter Foldes
Bruce
Also according to the OP it is 6 yrs old which makes me lean strongly towards your
answer
Also according to the OP it is 6 yrs old which makes me lean strongly towards your
answer
Bruce Chambers said:The fact that it worked on WinXP is absolutely *NO* reason to believe that
it would work on Vista. They're two _different_ operating systems.
Perhaps, but then, that is what exactly what the overwhelming majority of
Microsoft's target customer base is.
Who can say? If you'd simply open the file with a plain text editor, such
as Notepad, as you've already been advised to do, someone should be able
to help.
While you're at it, why not ask them if their product is even
Vista-compatible, to start with? (Had you taken this elementary and
obvious step this first, you probably wouldn't have even had a problem to
post, you know.)
How does preventing the installation of incompatible and possibly damaging
software "restrict the freedom of computer users?" If Vista had permitted
the installation of potentially harmful software that then tanked your
system, you'd just be whining that Microsoft doesn't do enough to protect
your system and data.
In this case, I'd have to say that you're proof of concept.
--
Bruce Chambers
Help us help you:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin
Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand
Russell
The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot
Richard Urban said:When you run the above .reg file
Bruce Chambers said:Have you considered the very real possibility that the application in
question simply isn't Vista-compatible, and that no amount of tinkering
will make it work?
Sam said:I see nothing indicating that is relevant. The ability or inability of
processing the reg file is not relevant to Vista compatibility of the
program.
Bruce Chambers said:The fact that it worked on WinXP is absolutely *NO* reason to believe that
it would work on Vista. They're two _different_ operating systems.
While you're at it, why not ask them if their product is even
Vista-compatible, to start with? (Had you taken this elementary and
obvious step this first, you probably wouldn't have even had a problem to
post, you know.)
How does preventing the installation of incompatible and possibly damaging
software "restrict the freedom of computer users?"
Bruce Chambers said:Of course it's relevant. If the *.reg file in question tries to modify a
registry "location" that does not and/or cannot exist in Vista, it won't
work.