D
David Maynard
baracooda said:When somebody suggest an strange new idea, it is just confusing and
pointless for you to suggest an even wackier idea that has nothing to
do with the idea that suggested except certain shared parts.
Using a wacky idea to illustrate the impracticality of the original isn't
'pointless'. That IS the point.
I would
appreciate more if your honest opinions lands directly on my design
and its implications.
I've previously done so many times and to great length.
What is wrong with my design?
Impractical, expensive, is a 'solution' seeking a 'problem', and won't work
as drawn.
Does it not
perform the tasks that it was design to do?
The classic windshield wiper on eyeglasses invention 'performed the task it
was designed to' and didn't fly either.
As far as I can tell it
will.
You obviously haven't tried to actually MAKE one.
Is it a solution looking for a problem? It seems that way.
Seems that way because, IMO, it is. And it's a common 'engineers' problem
to be obsessed with the technical niftiness of something and then try to
find something to use it for.
But
in this case, it is more like a combinational improvements in PC case
design, videoconference enhancement, and automated robotic
photography.
Just making the description more complex and tossing in a few claims like
'improvement' and 'enhanced' doesn't alter the fact.