A
Alias said:<SNIP SHIT>
Alias
Kevin said:You really don't need a page of bullshit.
I'll tell you the difference:
Ubuntu runs Open Sores software programs that NOBODY uses.
Windows uses Windows based programs that EVERYBODY uses.
Ubuntu has been free for many years yet most reject Ubuntu as garbage.
See - Now isn't that better than reading all that bullshit Alias posted?
Saucy said:One you can't give away even at zero cents, the other commands a price.
One is free if your time is worthless, the other costs but frees up your
time.
One is so "open" and "flexible" they leave it to you to recompile the
kernel if you get a new printer need to get it to work, the other has a
flexible API enabling developers to write drivers so that when you get a
new printer, it works.
One has a small bunch of followers who all think this is is the year
their OS takes the desktop - and they've been thinking this every year
since 1996 - the other can be found working away -guess where - on the
desktop.
One is called Linux and it sucks, the other is called Windows 7 and it
blows.
Saucy
Alias said:A lie.
Another lie.
My, my, another lie.
Dell has about a dozen Ubuntu based computers yet you say "they can't give
it away".
And you swallow.
Linux sucking:
http://androidtux.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/windows_sucks.jpg
Ewwww Windows juice!
Alias
Saucy said:I know you are hurting Alias.
So I overlook the personal insults in this
time of your pain.
copies of Windows 7 have been installed on desktop harddrives than the
entire existing Ubuntu install base.
Don't deny your pain, Alias, let it out. Send be a P.O. Box and I well
send you a box of kleenex in celebra/x/x/x/ with condolences for you on
Ubuntu's obscurity (although I heard there's a town in Spain near some
shore where some Yankee expatriot pays off everyone there to run Ubuntu
in order to feed his delusion that Ubuntu is "everywhere" on the desktop).
Saucy
Alias said:A lie.
It's true. You are ill informed as usual. Typical Ubuntard.Another lie.
My, my, another lie.
Dell has about a dozen Ubuntu based computers yet you say "they can't give
it away".
Kevin said:It's true. You are ill informed as usual. Typical Ubuntard.
It's true. You are ill informed as usual. Typical Ubuntard.
It's true. You are ill informed as usual. Typical Ubuntard.
So you are saying that Dell has sold about a dozen PCs with Ubuntu? I
didn't know they sold that many!
Everyone knows that Ubuntu is worth exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING
Alias said:You're just bound and determined to reveal to everyone your bias,
ignorance and stupidity, aren't you? Well, you're doing a great job. Keep
it up!
Alias
Kevin said:Not true. Tell me why Ubuntu is still on less than one percent of the
desktops if the product was good. Do you know about word of mouth? If
Ubuntu was a great product, I would tell 10 people. Those 10 would tell
another 10 each and the word would spread like wildfire. Well, years
later, word hasn't spread. The reason that word hasn't spread about
that INFERIOR Ubuntu is because the product is SHIT and NOBODY wants to
use it except a few geeks and others whose time isn't valuable.
Get over it.
Stop your lying.
Saucy said:One you can't give away even at zero cents, the other commands a price.
One is free if your time is worthless, the other costs but frees up your
time.
One is so "open" and "flexible" they leave it to you to recompile the
kernel if you get a new printer need to get it to work, the other has a
flexible API enabling developers to write drivers so that when you get a
new printer, it works.
One has a small bunch of followers who all think this is is the year
their OS takes the desktop - and they've been thinking this every year
since 1996 - the other can be found working away -guess where - on the
desktop.
One is called Linux and it sucks, the other is called Windows 7 and it
blows.
Saucy
If Windows is really so good and linux sucks, I wonder why instead of
innovating, MS is claiming creation of a bunch of "new" features in Win7
are in reality features copied from linux that have been in linux for
years!
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1009&tag=nl.e011
This is not to say that everything about one OS or the other sucks but
maybe they both have a purpose for many people, even if not for you
personally. You just seem to sound so closed minded Saucy.
Saucy said:That Microsoft "doesn't innovate" is just a slogan. It has no meaning
except as a tool to manipulate emotions. Most all software is built on
what comes before anyway. Rarely does anyone completely reinvent the
wheel. E.g. Microsoft Office had to be written in a computer language -
one Microsoft didn't necessarily invent i.e. Microsoft probably did not
invent the computer languages C or C++. Microsoft however may have
contributed to its development. Microsoft has hundreds maybe thousands
of programmers. To say none of them ever innovate is ridiculous.
And, yes, Microsoft did create a computer language in recent history,
namely C#. It also extended languages such as C++ so that they could be
written in managed code etc. etc. etc.
But as I've already killfiled Alias, I really have no intention of
carrying on with this sort of vacuous drivel.
Saucy
Frank said:You mean like LT "invented" linux...from Unix?
Frank said:Nice try at backpedaling...hahahah!!!...LOL! Now you try talking about
MS without mentioning linux ok?...Hahahah!!!
Oops!!!
Frank said:Yeah you went into hyperbole at the mere mention of LT!...hahaha!
Oops!