temp monitoring diodes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lez Pawl
  • Start date Start date
Untrue, "IF" there's a discrete second sensor, it may show
up nearer the heat sources on one board, further away on
others. Somewhat arbitrary and anything BUT a deliberate
attemp to keep away from these sources.

It's all beside the point though, most boards don't have
discrete temp sensors, instead relying on a readout provided
from one of the chips instead.




Wrong.
Northbridge can easily get hotter than a CPU using HALT
cooling, particularly the newer generations of flipchip,
chipsets and any of the more efficient CPUs (mainly meaning,
not a Prescott).
Click to expand...

You are right.
Below are Everest reports taken while system is "idle" (5 windows, but
no HD activity, and CPU only engaged in XP background activity.
The CPU is a Northwood with the stock Intel Fan/HS.
Asus Probe software consistently shows the same trend, but
the MB/CPU temps are 32/28.



Everest Report (Summary)
Motherboard:
CPU Type Intel Pentium 4, 3200 MHz (16 x 200)
Motherboard Name Asus P4P800 SE (5 PCI, 1 AGP, 1 WiFi,
4 DDR DIMM, Audio, Gigabit LAN)
Motherboard Chipset Intel Springdale i865PE
System Memory 2048 MB (DDR

Everest Report (Sensor)
Temperatures:
Motherboard 32 °C (90 °F)
CPU 27 °C (81 °F)
GPU 54 °C (129 °F)
GPU Ambient 37 °C (99 °F)
Maxtor 7Y250P0 27 °C (81 °F)
Maxtor 6B250R0 30 °C (86 °F)
Maxtor 6Y160P0 26 °C (79 °F)

Cooling Fans:
CPU 3041 RPM
Chassis 1513 RPM
Power Supply 2538 RPM
 
... snip ...
Click to expand...
Nothing but invective. I tried letting you out of the PLONKbox,
but that was obviously a mistake. Back you go.
Click to expand...

Idiotic invective too. Its odd cos he does often get the simpler things
right, but loses it entirely on stuff like this.


NT
 
Rod said:
(e-mail address removed) wrote

Nope, not unless he is using a peltier for cpu cooling, child.
Click to expand...

aha, well done for admitting it is in fact possible, and thus not
against the laws of physics.

A quick hand check isnt likely to be able
to distinguish between 30C and 40C, child.
Click to expand...

it isnt intended to. Do you follow anything? Its intended to make sure
the parts arent over 60C, which is what matters. Whether a cpu is at 30
or 40 is immaterial.

Makes a lot more sense to make the cpu work
harder and see which temp increases instead, child.
Click to expand...

not really.

No need for that when both of those temps are fine, child.
Click to expand...
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
Click to expand...

lol. I spose thats all thats left.

Perfectly reasonable to rely on it with both temps being fine for the cpu
temp, and completely trivial to check if they are reversed or not, child.

Even someone as stupid as you should be able to manage that, if someone
was actually stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane,
given that you have clearly wanked yourself blind years ago, child.
Click to expand...

I'd really hate to be you, so utterly strung up by your own ego issues.


NT
 
Rod said:
I understand fine that you are desperately attempting to bullshit your
way out of your predicament and fooling absolutely no one at all, child.
Click to expand...

There must be a name for this. Anyone?


NT
 
NZLamb said:
Rod: When you are in a hole, the only way out is to stop digging, child.

NT: Don't fight with a pig in the mud; you get dirty and the pig enjoys it.

Seriously guys...
Click to expand...

Lol, youre probably right.


NT
 
Some terminal ****wit plonker that's so stupid
that it hasnt even noticed that kill files actually
work without announcing their contents,
just the puerile shit thats all it can ever manage.
 
(e-mail address removed) wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Click to expand...
aha, well done for admitting it is in fact possible,
and thus not against the laws of physics.
Click to expand...

Pity that he aint using a peltier, ****wit.

Its against the laws of physics given that he aint using a peltier, ****wit.
it isnt intended to. Do you follow anything? Its intended to
make sure the parts arent over 60C, which is what matters.
Click to expand...

It aint gunna be over 60 even if the sensors are reversed, ****wit.
Whether a cpu is at 30 or 40 is immaterial.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant to the OP's question, ****wit.
not really.
Click to expand...

Fraid so. Thats what the OP wants to
know, if the sensors are reversed or not.

You're so stupid you cant even manage to work that out yet.
lol. I spose thats all thats left.
Click to expand...

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
I'd really hate to be you, so utterly strung up by your own ego issues.
Click to expand...

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
 
Some gutless ****wit desperately cowering behind
(e-mail address removed) wrote just the puerile shit
thats always pouring from the back of it.
 
Maybe you could explain how this works then. CPUs need to be run at
relatively low temps to preserve high speed performance, whereas volt
regs and so on can happily run upto 175C.
Click to expand...

Not really true, you'll get abysmal life out of a regulator
up at 175C. Likewise you shouldn't run a CPU at their max
spec'd ~ 75-90C either.
Cost is important in the
competitive world of computer parts, and lower design temps mean more
silicon and more heatsinking. So why would I, or anyone else designing
a mobo, use a volt reg design temp limit below that of the CPU? In what
way did I go wrong all these years when designing psus?
Click to expand...

You asking to go off-topic. Better to post in a different
forum.

You'd use a volt reg design that stays cooler because there
is limited board real-estate to 'sink away the heat, and
because immediately adjacent copper, coating, nearby
capacitors, inevitably 'sink some of that heat but don't
have the high temp resistance of silicon.
 
Some gutless ****wit desperately cowering behind
it can ever manage when its got done like a dinner, as always.
 
Some terminal ****wit plonker that's so stupid
that it hasnt even noticed that kill files actually
work without announcing their contents,
just the puerile shit thats all it can ever manage.
Click to expand...

Some gutless, illiterate ****wit desperately cowering behind
(e-mail address removed) wrote just the puerile shit
thats (sic) always pouring from the back of it,
and who just can't stand not having the last word.
 
Back
Top