Of course this is beta code. That's not the point here, however. To release
a beta to general public without support for one of the most widely used
audio cards (i.e., Soundblaster) and on top of that to not advise users of
this deficiency before they install is a major miss for Microsoft. This is
not some odd, noncritical peripheral we're talking about. If basic audio
functionality is missing, because of a lack of support for these devices,
then this software should not have been released outside of the development
and professional IT communities and a notice should have been given.
Sorry, but this thinking just seems so wrong to me that I can't resist
replying. Here's the point: This software is advanced. On my
computer, Device Manager is clean and EVERYTHING works. I cannot
distinguish it from a RC on my computer. Therefore, why in the world
would you assert that Microsoft should be obligated to hold up their
beta testing just because one company -- the ALWAYS-TARDY Creative
Labs -- cannot get their act together.
We all understand that this beta isn't much fun on your particular
computer, but that is no reason that MS shouldn't release it,
especially with the provisos they give repeatedly about not installing
it on production machines or the main computer in a home setting.
If you don't want to beta test, then quit downloading beta software.