Commented inline .....
So I can waste my time by going and search/hunt through a site to find
that there is nothing I can use??
So you'd rather waste your time reading 'cut and paste' from some plonker
who doesn't even have an opinion about what s/he is posting ??
Hell no, let me pick-n-choose from
P.T.'s list of the ones that look promising.
They would look just as promising at the site they were plucked from,
word for word. Your comment would be fair enough if the poster had said
something like ....... ' Hey, I found XXXX at XXXX.site.com, I tried it
and really liked it because .... blah blah blah' Whether that opinion was
good or bad wouldn't matter, at least the poster would actually have had
the brains to form an opinion. But to cut and paste EVERY link and
description from a site, especially a site such as pcworld (which rarely
has an unbiased review, or the latest version), is bullshit.
It's a hell of a lot more efficient that what you suggest.
What I find efficient is following up on what others here actually find
useful!! Tried, tested and recommended ..... not just links to any old
untried software. Hell, a chimpanzee could be taught to cut and paste !
I don't hear tell of anybody twisting
your arm behind your back to make you open up each and every one of
those headers, is there??
Nope. And I didn't. And now Protean Thread doesn't even have the
opportunity to show me whether or not s/he has the ability to actually
form a reasoned opinion on any software.