SQL Server Express: Small Work Group Sans Server?

  • Thread starter Thread starter (PeteCresswell)
  • Start date Start date
I'd add two points:

1) Our marketing person liked it when we specified SQL Server.
It made our product look more complex, and it helped justify our
price.

2) It made it easier when we talked to MS about our own software
costs if we could say that the product required SQL Server.
MS has always be relatively good about supplying the sales
and development channels.

(david)
 
david said:
I'd add two points:

1) Our marketing person liked it when we specified SQL Server.
It made our product look more complex, and it helped justify our
price.

2) It made it easier when we talked to MS about our own software
costs if we could say that the product required SQL Server.
MS has always be relatively good about supplying the sales
and development channels.

(david)



I have a question how do I get Microsoft Office Access 2000?
Click to expand...
Regards,
Brynden
 
I'd add two points:

1) Our marketing person liked it when we specified SQL Server.
It made our product look more complex, and it helped justify our
price.

2) It made it easier when we talked to MS about our own software
costs if we could say that the product required SQL Server.
MS has always be relatively good about supplying the sales
and development channels.
Click to expand...

If your clients knew these things they should seek out a different
provider, in my opinion, as neither of these is a valid reason to
specify SQL Server as requirement.

In any event, with my client, the specification for SQL Server is
not considered an issue, only the insistence on a particular
*version* of SQL Server when there's been no real justification for
that limitation provided.
 
If your clients knew these things they should seek out a different

That's why they liked to keep the clients away from the engineers...
(david)
 
Back
Top