J
oh go "retire" from usenet again...Like it or not
John Corliss said:http://www.joeuser.com/index.asp?c=1&AID=26403
Like it or not, he's right.
--
Regards from John Corliss
No adware, cdware, commercial software, crippleware, demoware,
nagware, shareware, spyware, time-limited software, trialware, viruses
or warez please.
oh go "retire" from usenet again...
John said:
Thanks John, just added that blog to my favs. I got nothing to give youVery true.
I have been giving stuff away for free for years on all the webpages I have
had. And somebody always comes along and want more.
But most just say thanks and move on or I would have stopped years ago.
Baloney. That guy's panties are just riding up. OK; I read itJohn Corliss said:Like it or not, he's right.
johnnie likes his baloney. (stuffed up his rump...)Baloney.
Wrong.
That guy's panties are just riding up.
OK; I read it
and he's not just wrong, wrong, dead wrong, but lazy and likely stupid,
to boot. If a person offers his goods or services for "free" and
_invites_ the public to avail themselves of it, he has the same
obligation (and is as liable for damages) to those who do so that he
would have if they'd paid cash money for his product/service.
Every
time. Without exception. Period. For example: Simply that a product,
good or service is "free" does not exempt it from warranty coverage,
including the implied warranty of merchantability (that is, the warrant
that the product/service actually _does_ what it purports to do). What
that means is that, even though a product or service may be "free",
those who use it are entitled to the same consideration and recompense
for damages as if they'd paid cash.
] Moral: Be very careful what you
offer for "free" and/or get a _signed_ liability waiver (a disclaimer
posted on a WWW site or a blurb in a TOS is not the same thing). If
someone offers "free" software and makes claims of its capabilities and
I choose to use it, I have an absolute, incontrovertible right to expect
the software to perform exactly as described---no more, no less; that it
was "free" is irrelevant. I'm tellin' you, man: Be _careful_ what you
offer "for free".
dadiOH said:assholiness
Derald said:Baloney. That guy's panties are just riding up. OK; I read it
and he's not just wrong, wrong, dead wrong, but lazy and likely stupid,
to boot. If a person offers his goods or services for "free" and
_invites_ the public to avail themselves of it, he has the same
obligation (and is as liable for damages) to those who do so that he
would have if they'd paid cash money for his product/service. Every
time. Without exception. Period. For example: Simply that a product,
good or service is "free" does not exempt it from warranty coverage,
including the implied warranty of merchantability (that is, the warrant
that the product/service actually _does_ what it purports to do). What
that means is that, even though a product or service may be "free",
those who use it are entitled to the same consideration and recompense
for damages as if they'd paid cash. Moral: Be very careful what you
offer for "free" and/or get a _signed_ liability waiver (a disclaimer
posted on a WWW site or a blurb in a TOS is not the same thing). If
someone offers "free" software and makes claims of its capabilities and
I choose to use it, I have an absolute, incontrovertible right to expect
the software to perform exactly as described---no more, no less; that it
was "free" is irrelevant. I'm tellin' you, man: Be _careful_ what you
offer "for free".
Derald said:Baloney. That guy's panties are just riding up. OK; I read it
and he's not just wrong, wrong, dead wrong, but lazy and likely stupid,
to boot. If a person offers his goods or services for "free" and
_invites_ the public to avail themselves of it, he has the same
obligation (and is as liable for damages) to those who do so that he
would have if they'd paid cash money for his product/service. Every
time. Without exception. Period. For example: Simply that a product,
good or service is "free" does not exempt it from warranty coverage,
including the implied warranty of merchantability (that is, the warrant
that the product/service actually _does_ what it purports to do). What
that means is that, even though a product or service may be "free",
those who use it are entitled to the same consideration and recompense
for damages as if they'd paid cash. Moral: Be very careful what you
offer for "free" and/or get a _signed_ liability waiver (a disclaimer
posted on a WWW site or a blurb in a TOS is not the same thing). If
someone offers "free" software and makes claims of its capabilities and
I choose to use it, I have an absolute, incontrovertible right to expect
the software to perform exactly as described---no more, no less; that it
was "free" is irrelevant. I'm tellin' you, man: Be _careful_ what you
offer "for free".
Thanks John. Good article.
Horsepucky!
If I offer freeware, along with a simple disclaimer, I'm personally
excempt from any retribution. That is, if my application has a bug and
wipes out critical data, my disclaimer will protect me on this, I did
afterall warn you that you were installing at your own risk. Believe it
or not, this is the case with purchased software as well! This might not
fly with malware, if you could prove the app was intended to be
malicious, but if it were a legitimate bug, you'd have a real tough time
getting any compensation. In this world you have a right to get what you
paid for. If you pay nothing, that is what you have a right to. Anyone
that feels different has their head in the sand as it were. I think you
need to rethink your persepctive on this.
Excellent find John, Thanks for the link.
512/udp said:oh go "retire" from usenet again...
Thanks John, just added that blog to my favs. I got nothing to give you
but my best regards,