M
meow2222
Mitch said:
Would you like to borrow my glasses?
I guess youre not up on the curious things the eye & brain do with
colour perception.
NT
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Would you like to borrow my glasses?
I guess youre not up on the curious things the eye & brain do with
colour perception.
NT
M
meow2222
And some Win color schemes dont use red much at all. So all you really
notice is that the red X in the top right hand corner isnt red anymore etc.
Hardly the end of civilisation as we know it any time soon.
lol Its funny what people get bent out of shape over. Which colour
scheme would you suggest?
NT
M
Mitch Crane
HE said he wanted to keep the old laptop in reserve and
was asking about running the screen in grayscale, ****wit.
Well, that won't work, ****wit, because without red you can't do
grayscale, ****wit.
Running it in grayscale isnt possible, putting up with the loss of
red is surprisingly viable.
So continuing to put up with the loss of red will work surprisingly
well without doing anything? Who would have guessed?
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof of what a terminal
****wit you have always been.
Thanks for your *not at all* superflous confirmation that the OP can
continue to do nothing and put up with the loss of red. You never could
bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
M
Mitch Crane
Thats because that fool Pawl molested the quoting, ****wit.
So stupid that it didnt even bother to check the original.
Yeah I read the original. Either you were saying buying a new laptop
would work, doing nothing at all and continuing to have no red would
work (both stupid confirmations of the obvious) or that he could do
greyscale, which won't work.
But ignoring the lack of red is surprisingly viable, ****wit.
No kidding? Brilliant! I'm sure the OP reallay appreciates you telling
him that he can just ignore the loss of red. Although I suspect that
the whole reason for the question is that the OP doesn't like it and
wanted to know if he could do grayscale.
I.e. it *could be* tolerable if it were grayscale, but apparently isn't
tolerable as it is now. Keep trying to bullshit your way out of this
wet paper bag.
M
Mitch Crane
(e-mail address removed) wrote in 14g2000cws.googlegroups.com:
No thanks, they apparenly aren't working very well.
No I'm up on the fact that, psychovisual phenomena aside, you can't do
greyscale without red. I'm also up on the fact that since the OP is
already having to put up with the loss of red and obviously isn't happy
with it, we can assume that the loss of red is quite noticeable and
annoying. Having used a monitor on the past where the red was very weak I
have some understanding of what that's like.
Can it be used without red? Sure, as the OP already knows and is
apparently unhappily doing now. What was asked was can grayscale be done.
The answer is, no, it won't work surprisingly well, he'll just have to
put up with no red on the backup machine.
Would you like to borrow my glasses?
No thanks, they apparenly aren't working very well.
I guess youre not up on the curious things the eye & brain do with
colour perception.
No I'm up on the fact that, psychovisual phenomena aside, you can't do
greyscale without red. I'm also up on the fact that since the OP is
already having to put up with the loss of red and obviously isn't happy
with it, we can assume that the loss of red is quite noticeable and
annoying. Having used a monitor on the past where the red was very weak I
have some understanding of what that's like.
Can it be used without red? Sure, as the OP already knows and is
apparently unhappily doing now. What was asked was can grayscale be done.
The answer is, no, it won't work surprisingly well, he'll just have to
put up with no red on the backup machine.
M
Mitch Crane
(e-mail address removed) wrote in
Yeah, they start calling people ****wit and other names over nothing.
Thank goodness Ron never does that, right? Or did you mean the OP
getting bent out of shape over the loss of red (as if that's even
needed)?
lol Its funny what people get bent out of shape over. Which colour
scheme would you suggest?
Yeah, they start calling people ****wit and other names over nothing.
Thank goodness Ron never does that, right? Or did you mean the OP
getting bent out of shape over the loss of red (as if that's even
needed)?
M
Mitch Crane
Thats because that fool Pawl molested the quoting, ****wit.
Oh, and by the way, it the fool who messed up the quoting wasn't Lez
Pawl, who quoted your entire post. The fool in question was apparently
(e-mail address removed). I guess you owe Lez Pawl an appology and meow2222
@care2.com a name calling (hint: try "****wit").
R
Rod Speed
Some terminal ****wit that cant even manage its own
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
R
Rod Speed
Some terminal ****wit that cant even manage its own
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
R
Rod Speed
Some terminal ****wit that cant even manage its own
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
R
Rod Speed
Some terminal ****wit that cant even manage its own
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
R
Rod Speed
(e-mail address removed) wrote
I just use the default, there isnt that much use of red and where its used
its obvious what should be red since you used it with red before it failed.
Rod Speed wrote
lol Its funny what people get bent out of shape over.
Which colour scheme would you suggest?
I just use the default, there isnt that much use of red and where its used
its obvious what should be red since you used it with red before it failed.
R
Rod Speed
Some terminal ****wit that cant even manage its own
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
lines, or anything else at all either, claiming to be
Mitch Crane <[email protected]> desperately
attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament
and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
M
meow2222
Mitch said:@mid.individual.net:
Oh, and by the way, it the fool who messed up the quoting wasn't Lez
Pawl, who quoted your entire post. The fool in question was apparently
(e-mail address removed). I guess you owe Lez Pawl an appology and meow2222
@care2.com a name calling (hint: try "****wit").
you two are a riot.
M
meow2222
Mitch said:(e-mail address removed) wrote in 14g2000cws.googlegroups.com:
reckon I know what his name is.
No I'm up on the fact that, psychovisual phenomena aside, you can't do
greyscale without red.
Lol, you cant put how vision works aside when discussing what the eye
sees. Your black isnt black either, on crts, but the perception of it
is black - and thats what counts.
NT
M
meow2222
Rod said:(e-mail address removed) wrote
I just use the default, there isnt that much use of red and where its used
its obvious what should be red since you used it with red before it failed.
makes sense to me.
NT
M
meow2222
Mitch said:(e-mail address removed) wrote in
Yeah, they start calling people ****wit and other names over nothing.
Thank goodness Ron never does that, right?
huh?
M
Mitch Crane
(e-mail address removed) wrote in
"Lol", I can certainly put it aside, because unlike the fact that my
black isn't really black, the loss of red is very perceptible. No one
is going to walk in here and go, "Whoa! Your blacks aren't all that
black." If my monitor had no red anyone who can see red would notice
it instantly.
Are you seriously arguing that people wouldn't notice the loss of red
in the same way they don't notice that blacks aren't really black? Do
you really think that, just as people buy monitors every day without
noticing that the black isn't black, people would buy monitors with no
red and not notice? Of course you don't.
reckon I know what his name is.
Lol, you cant put how vision works aside when discussing what the
eye sees. Your black isnt black either, on crts, but the perception
of it is black - and thats what counts.
"Lol", I can certainly put it aside, because unlike the fact that my
black isn't really black, the loss of red is very perceptible. No one
is going to walk in here and go, "Whoa! Your blacks aren't all that
black." If my monitor had no red anyone who can see red would notice
it instantly.
Are you seriously arguing that people wouldn't notice the loss of red
in the same way they don't notice that blacks aren't really black? Do
you really think that, just as people buy monitors every day without
noticing that the black isn't black, people would buy monitors with no
red and not notice? Of course you don't.
M
Mitch Crane
huh?
Sorry, Rod nor Ron. Try this:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?as_...1&as_maxd=29&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2006&safe=off>
Or just do a google groups search for: ****wit author:Rod author:Speed
It's funny what Rod get's bent out of shape over.
R
Rod Speed
Mitch Crane said:(e-mail address removed) wrote in
Sorry, Rod nor Ron. Try this:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?as_...1&as_maxd=29&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2006&safe=off>
Or just do a google groups search for: ****wit author:Rod author:Speed
It's funny what Rod get's bent out of shape over.
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
I call a spade a spade and a ****wit a ****wit.
You get to like that or lump it.