Server Advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Remedy
  • Start date Start date
Lol, this guy is a ****ing halfwit.
Click to expand...

I can't help it that you're too ignorant to set up a simple
file and FTP server. Or rather, I'm sure you can throw a
lot of money around and pay someone who DOES know how to do
it then pretend that based upon their abilities, YOU know
what you're doing?
 
Does anyone understand this?
Click to expand...


You act as if hardware failure is an arguement in your
favor. It's not since potential for hardware failure is
present with any alternative, but the logical failure
potential increases with increased complexity of the OS.
Basically, you might have an argument but so far haven't
made it.
 
You act as if hardware failure is an arguement in your
favor. It's not since potential for hardware failure is
present with any alternative, but the logical failure
potential increases with increased complexity of the OS.
Basically, you might have an argument but so far haven't
made it.
Click to expand...

Does anyone understand this?
 
Does anyone understand this?
Click to expand...


So you're clueless?
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand it. You
aren't arguing FOR anything that eliminates risk, but then
try to cite risk as being in your favor.
 
kony said:
I'm up to speed, but you are just trolling, right?
Click to expand...

Hard drives fail in workstations. It's a risk.
Hard drives fail in servers. It's a risk.

People generally throw money at file servers, e.g. RAID to minimise the
impact of such a failure, with RAID you'll either get fault tolerance
(hot swap, very expensive) or high availability (require a shutdown
period to replace faulty disk with no loss of data).

If you don't "complicate" a file server in this way then you stand to
lose all data since last backup when a hard drive fails.
 
Hard drives fail in workstations. It's a risk.
Hard drives fail in servers. It's a risk.

People generally throw money at file servers, e.g. RAID to minimise the
impact of such a failure, with RAID you'll either get fault tolerance
(hot swap, very expensive) or high availability (require a shutdown
period to replace faulty disk with no loss of data).

If you don't "complicate" a file server in this way then you stand to
lose all data since last backup when a hard drive fails.
Click to expand...

yes I'm familiar with raid, and haven't argued against it.
If that's what "Lordy" thought I was arguing against then
perhaps Lordy should've been a bit more expressive and the
sub-topic could've been addressed.
 
I just can't believe that I've made it this far into the thread!! Sheesh!
lol It's almost like a train wreck!

Doug
 
Back
Top