Seagate Confirms 1TB Hard Disk Drive

  • Thread starter Thread starter michail iakovou yos
  • Start date Start date
I have a 300 GB hard drive that I filled up after a few weeks from recording from my two TV tuners.
I then added an additional 500 GB hard drive and quickly filled that one up too.
Now I need a faster computer because it takes about 13 seconds for media center to display what I have recorded every time I browse through the recorded media.
Or I am hoping that the RTM has a better algorithm for this sorting.
I am running RC2, Office 2003 and several other applications, I have system Restore turned off and the paging file on the 2nd hard drive and all I am using is 8.33 gigabytes of a 60 gigabyte drive. I don't foresee the need for a terabyte hard drive for a long time.

And 300TB hard drive to arrive by 2010
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36675
 
Oh for the good old days of VCRs. Life was so much simpler.


I have a 300 GB hard drive that I filled up after a few weeks from recording from my two TV tuners.
I then added an additional 500 GB hard drive and quickly filled that one up too.
Now I need a faster computer because it takes about 13 seconds for media center to display what I have recorded every time I browse through the recorded media.
Or I am hoping that the RTM has a better algorithm for this sorting.
I am running RC2, Office 2003 and several other applications, I have system Restore turned off and the paging file on the 2nd hard drive and all I am using is 8.33 gigabytes of a 60 gigabyte drive. I don't foresee the need for a terabyte hard drive for a long time.

And 300TB hard drive to arrive by 2010
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36675
 
:-P
Oh for the good old days of VCRs. Life was so much simpler.


I have a 300 GB hard drive that I filled up after a few weeks from recording from my two TV tuners.
I then added an additional 500 GB hard drive and quickly filled that one up too.
Now I need a faster computer because it takes about 13 seconds for media center to display what I have recorded every time I browse through the recorded media.
Or I am hoping that the RTM has a better algorithm for this sorting.
I am running RC2, Office 2003 and several other applications, I have system Restore turned off and the paging file on the 2nd hard drive and all I am using is 8.33 gigabytes of a 60 gigabyte drive. I don't foresee the need for a terabyte hard drive for a long time.

And 300TB hard drive to arrive by 2010
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36675
 
I have an older leadtek 2000 deluxe tv tuner (that is not media center
compatible)
that automaticaly saves to whatever format you want. I have it set to WMV.

This gives me 200 mb per hour. That would give me 2500 hours of recorded tv
on
a 500 GB disk. The quality is very good too.

Remember, tv programs if they are not HDTV are low res, 600x480


I have a 300 GB hard drive that I filled up after a few weeks from recording
from my two TV tuners.
I then added an additional 500 GB hard drive and quickly filled that one up
too.
Now I need a faster computer because it takes about 13 seconds for media
center to display what I have recorded every time I browse through the
recorded media.
Or I am hoping that the RTM has a better algorithm for this sorting.
I am running RC2, Office 2003 and several other applications, I have system
Restore turned off and the paging file on the 2nd hard drive and all I am
using is 8.33 gigabytes of a 60 gigabyte drive. I don't foresee the need for
a terabyte hard drive for a long time.

And 300TB hard drive to arrive by 2010
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36675
 
Back
Top