T
Terry Parker
Hi All,
What's the best value in a scanner - preferably less than $150.....
What's the best value in a scanner - preferably less than $150.....
JAD said:I am currently looking also, as my old flatbed just passed away...moment
of silence.... anyway, I've have been looking at a microtek, or a
visioneer 7300, I think I'm going with the visioneer at 75$. What are your
uses going to be?
are you saying the 7300 is slow?
tweak said:Virtually all flatbed scanners on the market today(under 1,000) use
system ram, so they tend to move only as fast as ram sharing will
allow with whatever system your using.
I have some older pro flatbeds with onboard ram that move quite
quickly.
The cheapie scanners you get at you local wal-mart are terribly slow(
under 50 bucks say the Mustek Bearpaw etc...)
The HP's are no better though, just paying for a name there and if you
lose your driver cd you'll have to pay big bucks for replacement.
Hi All,
What's the best value in a scanner - preferably less than $150.....
Right! Unless you're doing critical image work just about any scannerI've owned expensive HP's and for my own work, I have found that a $79
Visioneer from Wal-Mart does just as good a job.
I AM being fair. I have a 3200C sitting in the corner that someoneBe fair. HP drivers can be downloaded from their website for free. The
fact that HP scanner drivers are crap and it's impossible to get an
older scanner working properly under WinXP is another story.
The canon is indeed an excellent scanner. A friend has one is please| Hi All,
|
| What's the best value in a scanner - preferably less than $150.....
I bought a Canon CanoScan 5000F about six months ago and have been delighted
with it. PC World rates it tops. It's $117 including shipping from Newegg.
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,112037,00.asp
Larc
Been there, tried that didn't work.
tweak said:Been there, tried that didn't work.
The actual software for the HP is alot more than just a few drivers.
HP's reasoning for not allowing free downloads of the entire driver CD
is due to file size and bandwidth considerations. i.e. it would eat up
to much bandwidth on their site to allow downloading of of such a
large driver package. Hence the descision to charge all for
replacement software.
That iddy bidy driver is junk, just read the critiques on the feedback
page.
As I recall the driver installer is around over 80 mb.(maybe larger.)
I did get my hands on a copy of the installer CD for the next model
up, but guess what? It wouldn't work either.
DIFFERENT drivers for each model in the line.
So I stand on what I said, HP is junk.(Mostly because of the corporate
jackals at the home office and their greedy ass ways.)
Thank you I'll give it a try. When I first tried to download theI found that also, which just goes to show you don't believe all you read....however Umax is doing this type of thing...they have no
qualms telling you on the drivers/software page.
Its sad when people don't know the difference between a DRIVER and SOFTWARE. Never used scanner software, can't do better than
PhotoShop for that.
Thanks for throwing the link out, though he's not interested..