B
Bill Sanderson
The false positive is fixed by defintions 5807, available at about 3 PM
2/10/2006, US Eastern standard time.
--
2/10/2006, US Eastern standard time.
--
Ritesh Kaul said:MS has fixed this issue. Update the virus definition to 5807 and it should
work. However, you may have to update it 2-3 times for it to take effect
[don't ask me why ]...I had to do it twice for it to reflect the correct
version.
Once you have version 5807, the pws.bancos.a issue ceases.
Jacob Visser said:I just downloaded the latest MS Antispyware definitions : Version: 5805
(2006-02-10 07:15:54)
A quick scan subsequently detected 614 Symantec AntiVirus Corporate Edition
10.0.2.2001 registry keys as a severe threat : PWS.Bancos.A Password Stealer
!!!
All keys and values under
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Intel\Landesk\VirusProtect6 where detected as
being the password stealer.
Is this a marketing ploy to eliminate a future concurent after the anouncment
of a future Microsoft anitvirus product ? ;-)
Athena T said:Better late than never... and to close this off. Yes, i had to run it 2
to 3
times before it kicked in and ignored the suspected trojan.
After all that, i wonder if i'll jump in and test the new defender tool
I think they've already set up a different group.
I'll wait and watch the posts from people working out the wrinkles on THAT
one.
Thanks, all.
T
Ritesh Kaul said:MS has fixed this issue. Update the virus definition to 5807 and it
should
work. However, you may have to update it 2-3 times for it to take effect
[don't ask me why ]...I had to do it twice for it to reflect the
correct
version.
Once you have version 5807, the pws.bancos.a issue ceases.
Jacob Visser said:I just downloaded the latest MS Antispyware definitions : Version: 5805
(2006-02-10 07:15:54)
A quick scan subsequently detected 614 Symantec AntiVirus Corporate
Edition
10.0.2.2001 registry keys as a severe threat : PWS.Bancos.A Password
Stealer
!!!
All keys and values under
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Intel\Landesk\VirusProtect6 where detected
as
being the password stealer.
Is this a marketing ploy to eliminate a future concurent after the
anouncment
of a future Microsoft anitvirus product ? ;-)