F
formerly known as 'cat arranger'
:
: "formerly known as 'cat arranger'" <[email protected]>
wrote
: in message : >
: > : > :
: > : : > : > On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:26:03 -0700, "formerly known as 'cat
: > : >
: > : >
: > : > >To me render means processing, like resizing, converting,
: > : > >filtering... like from a DVD format to VCD. When you say
: > : > >that things can be done realtime, that is still pretty slow, a
: > : > >lot slower than copying a file obviously, so at realtime a
: > : > >1G file would take 30 minutes to process, so where does
: > : > >a fast hard drive help? When would a job be bottlenecked
: > : > >by the speed of the hard drive? I guess that is my question.
: > : >
: > : > Suppose you're adding/subtracting/mixing/etc an audio
: > : > track... HDD may easily be the slowest part. Same for
: > : > cutting frames.
: > :
: > : Nope, not with currentATA HDs. In a very complex audio mixing
: > : situation the issue could be seek time limited and that is usually
: > addressed
: > : with multiple HDs.
: > :
: > :
: >
: > Doesn't caching help too?
:
: Potentially YES.
:
:
The older RAM though wouldn't be in demand.
I had a board with 2 megs of ram on it for a MAC
back 10 years ago or so. Compared to what was
around then it was awesome. I guess you could
just buy a bunch of ram and set up your own ram-
disk from memory. I wonder what a 1Gb cache
would be like for video editing.
: "formerly known as 'cat arranger'" <[email protected]>
wrote
: in message : >
: > : > :
: > : : > : > On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:26:03 -0700, "formerly known as 'cat
: > : >
: > : >
: > : > >To me render means processing, like resizing, converting,
: > : > >filtering... like from a DVD format to VCD. When you say
: > : > >that things can be done realtime, that is still pretty slow, a
: > : > >lot slower than copying a file obviously, so at realtime a
: > : > >1G file would take 30 minutes to process, so where does
: > : > >a fast hard drive help? When would a job be bottlenecked
: > : > >by the speed of the hard drive? I guess that is my question.
: > : >
: > : > Suppose you're adding/subtracting/mixing/etc an audio
: > : > track... HDD may easily be the slowest part. Same for
: > : > cutting frames.
: > :
: > : Nope, not with current
: > : situation the issue could be seek time limited and that is usually
: > addressed
: > : with multiple HDs.
: > :
: > :
: >
: > Doesn't caching help too?
:
: Potentially YES.
:
:
The older RAM though wouldn't be in demand.
I had a board with 2 megs of ram on it for a MAC
back 10 years ago or so. Compared to what was
around then it was awesome. I guess you could
just buy a bunch of ram and set up your own ram-
disk from memory. I wonder what a 1Gb cache
would be like for video editing.