=|[ Courseyauto's ]|= said:
If shielded cables are so necessary,why havn't flat shielded cables been
recomened.
Well, there could be many such questions and answers, sheilding flat cables
would make them even more cumbursome for a start - they didnt bring out
80line flat cables until transfer rates required them (try using 40pin line
above ata 66) but they do apperently struggle at ata133 - ECC handling is
usualy going on (transparently) at the top speed. Most users dont know to
monitor that. Its the nature of the technology to max out the physical
properties of equipment standards before moving on, so ATA has reached 133
and wont be going much/any further. The Via IDE Miniport driver
automaticaly lowers the DMA mode when it detects ECC handling (nice driver
if only it still worked)
I have run my PCI buss overclocked but the improvment ewas so
small i quit.
My PCI is overclocked as a side effect of overclocked FSB -which is where
my real performance gain is -its out of curiousity as much as any practical
purpose.
I now use raid O on one computer and a WDraptor drive on the
other,performance is execellant.
Hmm, Raptor - Nice. ATA 100 is ok, but if your running ata133 over
unshielded cables, you could check SMART log for ECC error occurence.
I think its- "Ultra ATA CRC Error Rate", this can be very high without
being obvious while using windows.
SATA is the wave of the future,round cables for them also?
Skinny sheilded ones I think.
Gold is not a good conductor,it's there for corrosion protection. DOUG
iirc, its one of the best conductors for heat, electricity -and
inappropriate sales
--
' gathering moss,
andy
PS: Check your Newsreader -its ignoring sigs and consequently posting in
sigspace, likely to be a hinderance in the long run - awkward for many.