J
jim
On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:54:04 -0400, in
Let me share something that i found to be humorous -- back in 93 or 94 I
browsed through many of the Windows 3.1 OS installation files. Several
had readable programmer's comments in the compiled code. One comment i
found was "now lets clear some memory so that this pig can run".
BTW, apparently SeaTools For Windows did a jam up job last night -- the in
depth SMART report on the drive -- not by Seagate -- is at
http://www.hddstatus.com/hdrepshowreport.php?ReportCode=6054074&ReportVerification=2740FB9B
That same disk was previously reporting, via this analysis service, a 0
percent fitness rating and now, the fitness rating is 97%.
I used the "Short, Repair all" diagnostic/repair which ran for about 40
minutes. I hope it "sticks".
Also, .net framework 4 seems much better behaved than 3.5 SP2.
Services.msc still shows NGEN as disabled, same as i set it for 3.5.
jim
I know a lot of people who
worked with computers extensively back in the 80's and even earlier....
some are just about lost in Windows. So, my use of the word involves
experience with Windows, not with punch cards or Cobol or Fortran.
Let me share something that i found to be humorous -- back in 93 or 94 I
browsed through many of the Windows 3.1 OS installation files. Several
had readable programmer's comments in the compiled code. One comment i
found was "now lets clear some memory so that this pig can run".
BTW, apparently SeaTools For Windows did a jam up job last night -- the in
depth SMART report on the drive -- not by Seagate -- is at
http://www.hddstatus.com/hdrepshowreport.php?ReportCode=6054074&ReportVerification=2740FB9B
That same disk was previously reporting, via this analysis service, a 0
percent fitness rating and now, the fitness rating is 97%.
I used the "Short, Repair all" diagnostic/repair which ran for about 40
minutes. I hope it "sticks".
Also, .net framework 4 seems much better behaved than 3.5 SP2.
Services.msc still shows NGEN as disabled, same as i set it for 3.5.
jim