R
Rod Speed
Finally someone with the voice of experience.
Thats flagrantly dishonest, Rus was too.
Can you tell us the highest ATA rating used?
Gotta be ATA33 with systems that old.
Finally someone with the voice of experience.
Can you tell us the highest ATA rating used?
Actually not.
You are reading in a lot more than is there.
Perhaps you are not used to dealing with Texans.
They are very AngloSaxon in their ways.
If the standards can be "relaxed" and the system works,
so what about these standards?
The term "importance" implies a value judgement,
Nope.
to which you and others are entitled, but I am entitled to
consider the standards "relaxed" if the system works for me.
I am certainly not going to spend more money
on SATA - both the drives and the bays
- when PATA works for me,
not on the basis of what you judge to be "important".
If you have some concrete evidence that the kind of setup I
have - quality components throughout - is defective, I will listen.
But you have this removable bay bigotry
that may serve you well, but it is not relevant to me as it stands
until you can back it up with something that applies directly to me.
I have debated the round IDE cable issue and the consensus
was that quality cables are just as good as flat cables.
Your prejudices are noted. You like to be a purist, which is fine
if that's your thing. I am a bit more adventuresome and I like
innovative approaches even if they relax standards a little -
especially when they work better than alternative approaches.
I have seen far more weeping and moaning about SATA than round
IDE cables and removable bays when used with quality components.
Ad-hom noted. I have been a gentleman with you throughout this debate.
I expect you to follow suit.
If you have a message that you think is important, then I will listen.
But you are not my wife so you can't
tell me what to do and what not to do.
I will respectfully decline to follow your admonitions,
keeping in mind that I am taking a bit of a risk.
SATA has more known problems than round IDE cables
and removable bays made by reputable manufacturers.
Also SATA is more expensive.
I will wait another generation before jumping into SATA.
Not when it costs them money.
I know some of the Directron people, since I was one of their
earliest customers before they went national. I have discussed
the issue of second-rate parts and they tell me that it pays
them to weed such crap out of their product line because
poor quality costs them more than they make on the sale.
I picked Kingwin because it was recommended
to me by the head of the technical group.
I did not get into why they stocked other brands - that's
their business. But you can be assured that if they spot
a pattern of poor quality they will drop the product.
Take a look at what happened to their Epox offering. As recent as
a year ago they carried a full line of Epox MBs. Now they carru none.
You cannot offer anything concrete to support that claim.
Did he tell you the components he used?
Is he qualified to work on hardware?
Did he have other problems?
You are obsessed with this standards stuff.
Psychologists have a term for that behavior
but I promised not to get personal.
You flaunt standards when you top post
and fail to use the apostrophe,
when it is perfectly possible to comply.
Of course, if English is your second language
and you are new to Usenet,
I can understand why you top post and fail to
use the apostrophe when it is clearly required.
No, I am playing devil's advocate. I thought that was obvious.
I am also interested in discovering how a vendor like Directron and a
manufacturer like Kingwin - both reputable - can get by with foisting
defective products onto the market. I know for a fact that a
low-margin operation like Directron can't afford problems with
components, so it there really was a problem here, they would not be
offering the Kingwin removable bays.
I can imagine low quality components to exacerbate a flaky connector
problem. But that is not the issue. The issue is whether the Kingwin
KF-series of removable bays are uniformly bad.
It is, however, grounds for investigating whether Kingwin did do such
testing.
I have used the Kingwin KF-21 for years, on a monthly basis. The
lockup is very tight - I have to use the front handle to lever the
tray in as tight as it can go. Once I turn the key that tray is tight
as though it were screwed into the bay. There is no slop at all.
I agree that such an indictment is possible. But I am requiring direct
evidence that Kingwin actually is guilty as charged. You and the
others could be guilty of a rush to judgement.
I come back to my original statement: I find it difficult to accept
that Directron and Kingwin can sell junk on the open market for so
long (over 5 years that I know about).
I talked directly to the man
who is the head of the technical group at Directron and asked him if
they had any problems with Kingwin removable bays. He said they have
had no more trouble with them than any other computer part.
We have seen people on these forums who can't even connect an IDE
ribbon cable properly, so it would not surprise me at all to find that
there are people on these forums who have reported trouble with
removable bays, especially the kind found in junk shops.
But like everything else in life, YMMV.
Bob said:Finally someone with the voice of experience.
Can you tell us the highest ATA rating used?
Rod said:.... snip ...
Yes, some are silly enough to flout standards when its perfectly
possible to buy a standard compliant removable drive bay using SATA.
CBFalconer said:Do you receive a commission per use of the word 'flout'?
-snip-I fail to see the significance of that figure.