W
Wattsville Blues
What is the best antivirus program available, in terms of overall
performance?
Thanks.
performance?
Thanks.
Wattsville said:What is the best antivirus program available, in terms of overall
performance?
Thanks.
Kaspersky by far,I have seen it find what the others have missed moreWattsville said:What is the best antivirus program available, in terms of overall
performance?
Thanks.
madmax said:Kaspersky by far,I have seen it find what the others have missed more
often than not.
-max
--
To help you stay safe see: http://www.geocities.com/maxpro4u/madmax.html
This message is virus free as far as I can tell.
Change nomail.afraid.org to neo.rr.com so you can reply by e-mail
(nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
use in Usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
Wattsville said:What is the best antivirus program available, in terms of overall
performance?
Thanks.
jimbo said:I will second the NOD32 reccomendation. The only virus I ever had was
when I was using McAfee. And Norton has gone to product activation, so
scratch them off my list. Anyway, Norton has a way of hogging the
computer when it wants, not when I want.
jimbo
Wattsville said:What is the best antivirus program available, in terms of overall
performance?
Thanks.
madmax said:Kaspersky by far,I have seen it find what the others have missed more
often than not.
-max
Netuser said:I'll also recommend NOD32, but you should see the
selection of AV programs before you make your final decision:
http://www.wilders.org/index.htm
Netuser 58
Is there a list online of which AV programs use the Kaspersky engine?
And I'm assuming there are different verions or revisions of the engine
also.
I will certainly try Kaspersky before purchasing my next AV.
Let's review that statement, shall we?
"And would you believe it has never detected a virus on any of my
systems?
Must be doin' its job."
How do you equate the fact that it has never alarmed to the product
doing it's job?
If your system were to run across a virus that the product missed, it
wouldn't alarm
then either.
Now folks, Optikl is no idiot. I just found the statement humorous. Can
you point me to
a url? I'd like to take a look.
Julian said:Netuser 58 wrote:
Perhaps also check out the results of the VB 100% tests at
http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/about/index.xml .
jimbo said:Julian Moss wrote:
The 100% rating by vb100 and the low resource requirement are the
reasons I went with NOD32.
jimbo
optikl said:I rather like Blue Bayou anti-virus. It's unbelievably light on
resources. It's like it's not even there. And would you believe it has
never detected a virus on any of my systems? Must be doin' its job.
I've tried about 5 AV programs, and prefer NOD32. It does well in most
of the detection tests on the web. I dunno how good the heuristics are.
For anti-trojans, I like TDS-3.
michael
Julian said:jimbo wrote:
It's not the only product to get the VB100 rating on a consistent
basis, though.