F
Folkert Rienstra
kony wrote in news:[email protected]
Actually it just casts some doubt on whether you are just another babble-head, just like the babblebot.
Who is the undisputed king of spelling errors and typos btw.
Oh, and you're likely to end up in babblebot's killfile now too.
And? It doesn't change that I have systems with RT8169
which achieve more than 25MB/s.
Some, certainly with a few Via chipsets which had poor PCI
bandwidth that was choking data flow to the NIC. As for
pure chipset - NIC interactions, it is very rare and even
more often attributable to an OS problem rather than
mainboard problem.
Most can at least use 4K frames if not 7-9K. The majority
of networking equipment will pass more than 1.5K.
Many of us did buy a chipset or two that had this problem,
but by midway into the Pentium 3 era, it was mostly reserved
to Via chipsets as Sis had then covercome it. Intel had
great PCI throughput much further back, I can't put my
finger on exactly when it was more than 80MB/s but certainly
by the 440LX/P2 era, and probably before that.
Yes, I mistyped 30MB/s.
Yep, but wouldn't that have been obvious by my prior statements?
Actually it just casts some doubt on whether you are just another babble-head, just like the babblebot.
Who is the undisputed king of spelling errors and typos btw.
Oh, and you're likely to end up in babblebot's killfile now too.