Questions: Building a dedicated personal video recorder (PVR)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ken Moiarty
  • Start date Start date
running Norton Personal Firewall and Antivirus

Try Kerio Personal Firewall and Avast anti-virus. They are very low
profile apps. Together they have used only about 1 minute of CPU time
in the last 24 hours.




--

"Our country's a place of limitless hopes and
possibilities, and nowhere is that spirit more
alive than in the great nation of Texas."
--GW Bush, U.S. President from Texas

"One thing that makes George Bush such a great
president is that he does not govern according
to public opinion polls."
--John Cornyn, U.S. Senator from Texas
 
Ken Moiarty said:
Your question doesn't make logical sense. First you state that _you_
barely have time to watch your VCR. Then you proceed to query, therefore
why would _I _ want to capture that many video streams?

It was a serious question....

I was trying to learn something here

maybe a media PC is for me and I just don't know it
 
Six tuners seems to be a bit too much. My wife and I have been using
BeyondTV for two years or so. My PC only has one tuner. Most of the
time, one tuner is enough for my wife and I (we tend to watch totally
different TV shows). I almost never get into a situation that I want
to record two TV shows in the same time slot. In a few occasions, my
wife and I both want to record two different TV shows in the same time
lot (I give in 75% of the time); that were the only time I wanted to
have two tuners.

This means at most I would want are two tuners. I don't see any reason
why I would want 4 or 6 tuners. The reasons are very simple: (1)
There are not that many good TV shows that I want to record; most are
repeats anyway. (2) Most TV shows repeat themselves after midnight or
at a different time slot in the same week; if one time slot has
conflict, I simply record it in a different time slot. (3) The number
of tuners in a PC is also limited by the number of tuners in the
set-top box, and the number of set-top-boxes. (4) More importantly,
there is not enough time in a day to watch that many TV shows; I delete
more TV shows than I actually watch.

Obviously, your viewing pattern is different from mine. But I still
have a feeling that 2 tuners should be enough for one to two persons.
I would only want to have 4 tuners if my kids also want to start
recording TV shows.

If you can limit the number of tuners in the PC, you will not need a
very powerful CPU or a very large hard disk. This in turn reduces the
cost and the cooling requirement.

There is one thing that I am not sure that is how HDTV may change your
need of the number of tuners in your PC: My impression is:
"If your TV has SDTV or HDTV tuner, you will be able to watch
live-TV in TV mode instead of using the tuner in the PC to watch
live-TV. This will cut down the number of tuner that you need in the
PC. On the other hand, if your HDTV doesn't come with a HDTV tuner and
you are trying to watch live HDTV shows over the air, you will have to
reserve one tuner in the PC for watching live HDTV shows at each HDTV
TV. If you have two HDTVs that don't have HDTV tuners, you will need
two tuners for recording shows, and two more tuners for watching
live-TV in those two HDTVs."
Please correct me if my impression is wrong.

Jay Chan
 
Okay. Fair enough. I cannot yet honestly give you an answer to that, as I
have to find out for sure yet myself. Currently I'm satisfied (or almost)
with just two tuners. Maybe by lusting for anything greater than a maximum
of three tuners, I'm unconsciously falling into the logical fallacy of
assuming that more is necessarily better. But considering that these
dual-tuner Hauppauge cards are easily affordable (at least for me
personally, not having a family to support at this time), and making full
use of a PVR is still a novel experience for me, I'm openminded to the
plausibility of the idea that having extra plenty tuner-capture cards just
might turn out to come in handy, at certain odd times, not too infrequently
to warrant having them. But as I said, I just do not yet have enough PVR
viewing experience behind me against which to compare and possibly
substantiate this expectation.

Ken
 
Obviously, your viewing pattern is different from mine. But I still
have a feeling that 2 tuners should be enough for one to two persons.

This is what I was thinking as well
 
Thanks. I'll remember these the next time Symantec notifies me it's that
time I have to purchase yet another version upgrade in order to continue
receiving service. I realized only a few days too late, this last time,
that I have been shelling out "premium performing bucks" for what in reality
is substantially less than a "premium performing product".

Ken
 
Bob said:
I thought the OP said it had three tuners per card.


Cool! I need to look at this offering closer.

I assume that the software allows you to split the TV signal so you
can watch a program you are not recording, or watch a program you have
previously recorded - like with a conventional DVDR. You would not
need a tuner for that because the TV would tune it.

Exactly!


I never said that.

Okay, my apologies.
It is right - we conducted the tests properly.


The test we relied on to benchmark this was DVD Shrink converting an
on-disk ISO to DVD format with about 50% compression. It took
essentially the same time.

Maybe that's because the process is calculation-intensive and
disk-intensive.

Having grown up in a period when the only machines my male peers and I
almost universally shared a strong common interest in (besides those very
un-machine-like, yet even more fascinating, females, that is) were
automobiles, it's easy sometimes to forget that a system's computing power
is not as intuitive a concept as say, engine horsepower. To mix analogies:
If we were to swap horsepower ratings for automobiles with the symbolic
ratings we use for system computing power instead (like CPU type and clock
speed in MHz), we would hear people say things like: "I just don't get it.
That 300 Ghz V-10 Pentium truck I just spent all my savings on to buy can
pull a full load up a hill so effortlessly you'd think it was on flat
pavement. But when towing an empty trailer of only a fraction of the
weight, it performs like a lazy mule; hill or no hill." <G>

Ken
 
Ken Moiarty said:
But as I said, I just do not yet have enough PVR
viewing experience behind me against which to compare and possibly
substantiate this expectation.

No problem

I've thought abt building a media PC as well

However.... I want to locate the media server in a
remote location such as unused room of house.... and
then pipe signal to LCD TVs in other areas of house

is that doable now days?
 
The number of tuners in a PC is also limited by the number of tuners in the
set-top box, and the number of set-top-boxes.

What set-top boxes?

We are talking about a PVR, which is a PC that has its own tuners? You
feed it the raw TV signal and it tunes in what you want.

I agree that 2 tuners is enough. But 1 is not enough. About 3 times a
week I have a time conflict and have to use the VCR to record the
second show. Then I dub it onto the DVD later. Pain in the arse.

Then there is the matter of time slipping, which requires an onboard
tuner that is laying off to the HDD. That would be one of the tuners
mentioned above. You could time slip and record at the same time. That
way if you get called away, you can finish the program later.





--

"Our country's a place of limitless hopes and
possibilities, and nowhere is that spirit more
alive than in the great nation of Texas."
--GW Bush, U.S. President from Texas

"One thing that makes George Bush such a great
president is that he does not govern according
to public opinion polls."
--John Cornyn, U.S. Senator from Texas
 
No problem

I've thought abt building a media PC as well

However.... I want to locate the media server in a
remote location such as unused room of house.... and
then pipe signal to LCD TVs in other areas of house

is that doable now days?

Yes it is. Though I don't have personal experience in this, I have seen
HDMI and DVI optical extensions advertised, which enable you to pipe
perfectly clear A/V signals available in patch lengths ranging from as
little as 30 feet to as much as 333 feet. To set up multiple signal feeds
throughout the house there are also HDMI and DVI signal spliiters available.
Of course, neither these nor the optical extensions are in any way cheap.
On the other hand, I've been told that an ethernet network lends itself
quite well as a more economical way of distributing A/V data throughout your
house. I'm not personally sure of just what additional adaptor equipment
one might look for by name in order to interface the ethernet to a TV
monitor, assuming (probably in ignorance here) that these don't tyically
have built in ethernet ports. But I am certain there are, at the most
costly, compact adapter devices made just for this purpose. So I'm certain
you wouldn't have to resort to using an additional PC or laptop alongside
each TV monitor just to to receive the ethernet A/V signal and spit it back
out in whatever form, through whatever kind of port, as required by each of
your TV monitors. But I'll leave the researching of the concrete specifics,
up to you to take from here if you're interested.

Ken
 
What PVR software are you using?

MythTV on Linux. Not much help tp you I'm afraid!
I'm well aware of the encoding work being
done on board the capture card itself, rather than the CPU, thank you.)



You mean via "daisy chaining"?

Or any kind of external storage, will give you room :)

Lordy
 
Hello Jay,

I almost missed your response. For some reason it doesn't show up on the
news server I've been using (new.supernews.com). (I'm currently using my
ISP [Shaw] news server to respond to your message here.) I was reading
Bob's reply to you and thinking to myself, where on earth did Bob read
this!? Then I checked Google Groups (and later Shawnews) where I found your
message actually displayed. Very strange... I'll have to complain to
supernews about this. Anway, on to your message...


Six tuners seems to be a bit too much. My wife and I have been using
BeyondTV for two years or so. My PC only has one tuner. Most of the
time, one tuner is enough for my wife and I (we tend to watch totally
different TV shows). I almost never get into a situation that I want
to record two TV shows in the same time slot. In a few occasions, my
wife and I both want to record two different TV shows in the same time
lot (I give in 75% of the time); that were the only time I wanted to
have two tuners.

This means at most I would want are two tuners. I don't see any reason
why I would want 4 or 6 tuners. The reasons are very simple: (1)
There are not that many good TV shows that I want to record;
Agreed.

most are repeats anyway.

_Most_ are.
(2) Most TV shows repeat themselves after midnight or
at a different time slot in the same week; if one time slot has
conflict, I simply record it in a different time slot.

Yes, I do this too. So far in my PVR consumer experience I haven't come
across the need for more than three tuners, max. But I haven't settled into
what my viewing habits are finally going to be like with this technology.
If you haven't read yet what else I wrote on this subject earlier today (or
was it yesterday?), here it is again in different words: Having 'more than
enough' tuners is to me like my having both a landline phone (with answering
machine and all), plus my unnecesary (some would say wasteful) cell phone
which I carry around with me all the time. The latter I cannot justify
based on how _much_ use I actually make of it. But every once in a blue
moon, man, has it ever come in handy!

Now my initial decision to carry a cell phone was not based on any realistic
or predictable expectation that it _would_ eventually come in really handy
from time to time. No, I went on a reasoned hunch. Now if the cost of the
cell phone was much higher than it is, that mere reasoned hunch wouldn't
have been enough for me to justify carrying it. But the cost was not too
much to pay for the "insurance" the phone has effectively given me.

The cell phone, of course, is the analogy. The actual topic here however is
similar to this analogy in that I have a hunch that there will be, even if
only once in a blue moon , times when there are several shows I'm very eager
to record... But with murphy's law still around, having three or more tuners
on board could just 'make my evening' in that regard.

Anyway, I'm not going to continue to dissect, analyze, 'analogize' and
belabor the question any further. Apparently non-self-explanatory personal
preferences may more often than not have nothing to do with good sense. But
if and when they sometimes do, one shouldn't necessarily have to push the
envelope of his/her communication skills by taking pains to explain and
defend his/her rationale for same just because a majority of curious
onlookers, for whom it mustn't need concern after all, 'don't readily get
(3) The number
of tuners in a PC is also limited by the number of tuners in the
set-top box, and the number of set-top-boxes.

No, this is not the case at all; unless you happen to live in some remote
area where you have no choice but to turn to (encrypted) satellite.
(4) More importantly,
there is not enough time in a day to watch that many TV shows; I delete
more TV shows than I actually watch.

Oh of course! Same here! Quite often what I thought might be of interest
to me to watch some time later in the week, I just never get around to
feeling like watching as there turn out to be many other shows I decide to
watch instead. So after a little while of that, I then just
unceremoniously, without any guilt over waste of good recording media such
as DVD-Rs, fresh video tape, etc, delete that program. See this is the
beauty of PVRs, which record everything to hard disk! Provided you have
enough hard disk space to work with, and enough tuners to keep the process
as unconstrained and thoroughly "one-button-touch-record" as possible, you
can totally *over record now*, then completely at your leisure *decide
later*, perhaps according to your mood at that moment, exactly what you feel
like watching right then! It's like extreme video-on-demand!
Obviously, your viewing pattern is different from mine. But I still
have a feeling that 2 tuners should be enough for one to two persons.
I would only want to have 4 tuners if my kids also want to start
recording TV shows.

If you can limit the number of tuners in the PC, you will not need a
very powerful CPU or a very large hard disk. This in turn reduces the
cost and the cooling requirement.

The number of hardware-encoder tuners doesn't affect CPU load whatsoever.
Now the number of A/V data streams needing to simultaneously be written to
disk may, as far as my own limited knowledge on the subject suggests.
However, based on feedback from some of the others here, even this activity
may in fact NOT have a significant impact on CPU load, ostensibly because it
is the IDE bus or pipline together with the processor-circuitry in each hard
drive being written to, that shoulders most or all of this load; not the
CPU.
There is one thing that I am not sure that is how HDTV may change your
need of the number of tuners in your PC: My impression is:
"If your TV has SDTV or HDTV tuner, you will be able to watch
live-TV in TV mode instead of using the tuner in the PC to watch
live-TV. This will cut down the number of tuner that you need in the
PC. On the other hand, if your HDTV doesn't come with a HDTV tuner and
you are trying to watch live HDTV shows over the air, you will have to
reserve one tuner in the PC for watching live HDTV shows at each HDTV
TV. If you have two HDTVs that don't have HDTV tuners, you will need
two tuners for recording shows, and two more tuners for watching
live-TV in those two HDTVs."
Please correct me if my impression is wrong.

The HDTV standard should pose no such change in number of tuners needed.
But I think what you are referring to is the fact that a lot of the earlier
HDTV monitors that came out didn't come equipped with their own tuners.
Yes, then obviously if you were someone who bought an HDTV monitor that
didn't have its own tuner, you would then have to provide for that tuner
somewhere external to that monitor. Whether that tuner is to be located in
your home-theater PC, a PVR, or as a stand alone home-theater receiver, or
in some other configuration or product somewhere else in your home, is up to
your preference.

Ken
 
But the logical step up in number of
tuners from two would be to go to at least four. Leaving open the option
for two tuners above that is, let's say, just extra breathing room.

I still think 3 is the next best number :)

Lordy
 
Lordy said:
MythTV on Linux. Not much help tp you I'm afraid!

A great deal less software overhead, I'm assuming based on the little I do
know about Linux.
Or any kind of external storage, will give you room :)

Yes. But in spite of how the term "daisy chain" sounds, your right: Not
pretty... <g>


Ken
 
(e-mail address removed) (Bob) wrote in
What make and model? Why so many tuners?

How much CPU power is used by these cards?

I have a Celeron-D CPU which is plenty fast for routine Internet use.
It is a helluva lot cheaper than its P4 counterpart. My son's P4 isn't
any faster except for games.

I would NOT use a Celeron for this. Celerons are certainly fast enough
for routine Internet use, but for real processing, I would go with a
"real" P4 or an AMD Athlon. Just not a Celeron!

I usually use Athlons when I build my own systems (database servers that
have high processing requirements) and occasionally Intel P4s. If you
can, get a modern chipset motherboard with a fast (at least 800 MHz) bus
between the CPU and the memory. For comparison, some of the higher-end
Dells show an 800 MHz bus.

David Walker
 
I would NOT use a Celeron for this. Celerons are certainly fast enough
for routine Internet use, but for real processing, I would go with a
"real" P4 or an AMD Athlon. Just not a Celeron!

But my system is just as fast as a P4 system for purposes of DVD work.

I do not have any game or graphics requirements - just Internet and
DVD. Why should I spend more money for something I can't use?


--

"To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove
from the minds of men their individualism their loyalty to
family traditions and national identification."
--Brock Chisholm, Director of UN WHO
 
Back
Top