Albright--
I could care less who is in charge.
The proper phrase is you couldn't care less. Meaning you are already
at your limit of caring. Hint: If you could care less, as you just
said, then you're not caring the least amount you could, because you
just told us "I could care less". said:
It's a user group. I've been using them a good while.
Probably no where as long as I have which is why I always laugh when
somebody admits they're not in charge, but keep acting like they are.
The cross posts are absurd.
Cross posting is common on Usenet. Hint: You're posting on Usenet.
There are no special rules for Microsoft groups. I bet you didn't know
that when people cross-post (post the same comments to multiple
newsgroups at the same time by setting the header to post their
messages to multiple groups), they are just saved in one place on the
news server. You see, you don't know anywhere near as much as you
think you know.
So cross-posting bothers nobody except maybe up-tight twits, doesn't
take up bandwidth and doesn't waste space on anybody's news server. So
what's your problem? Again it seems you just like to pretend you're in
charge.
Nobody but you keeps saying that. Which brings us full circle. You
keep saying you're not in charge, we all know you're not, yet you
insist on trying to control what other do. If you don't wish to help,
and you're not asking questions, why are you here? Nobody forces you
to answer anybody's post. You elect to do so or not. Your choice.
UAC isn't an install issue.
More of you attempting to control who posts what. Instead of having a
hissy fit if you bothered to read up on the subject you would learn
many people are bothered by UAC's implemenation, even MVP's and far
more knowledgeable people then you including professionals Microsoft
hired to deliberately attempt to break into Vists an demonstrated how
they did at a well attended Microsoft sponsored convention because of
the UAC. When you recover, pick yourself off the floor.
Has nothing to do with who is in charge.
Kindly explain your obsession with who's in charge. I don't claim to
be, you're certainly not and I see nobody else complaining yet you are
fixiated on who's in charge of a newsgroup you admit you aren't in
charge of, yet you keep acting like you are or want to be.
All 3 statements are accurate. I gave direct connections to bitch to MSFT about
it; that's more than I've seen you do.
You're just another primadana that got his ears pinned back and you
don't like it because it bruised your bloated ego. May I suggest you
develop a thicker skin and mellow out.
I see a lot of little children grown into adult bodies who had a lot of
people push them around as kids and an even greater number pushing them
around as adults projecting their pissedoff affect onto me.
You've been staring in a mirror haven't ya. What you just said is
known in the mental health industry as projecting.
How dumb does someone have to be to dump off topic issues into a setup group
when there are a dozen or so more groups for them?
How dumb do you have to be to keep complaining about something you
can't control or change? This group doesn't have much traffic. Its
probably the first newsgroup people trying to install Vista come to.
The scope of installing a operating system is rather broad and open
ended. If people after installing Vista immediately start getting
moronic UAC nag screens I would wager a good many of them may conclude
something happened that corrupted the install or that they missed a
step. If you're too big a primadona to want to help may I humbly
suggest you simply try real hard to find the willpower to simply skip
over such posts since they bother you so. You can try harder to be a
good little boy can't you Chad?
