gerogepds said:
Well to each his own. I tried firing up one of my old win98 machines
after a year of w2k, and was appalled by how many times it froze/
Once I learned how to properly set up and *maintain* W98 on a machine
with adequate resources, I rarely experienced freezes or BSODs.
I *do* experience them occasionally with my antique laptop, but
considering it's a 150mHz machine with 32Mb of RAM, I'm more apt to
attribute those to the hardware rather than to W98.
I like the fact that with W98, you can get into DOS if necessary. It's
not much of an issue with my personal machines running W2K and XP, but
when I'm asked to work on a virus/malware infested machine, being able
to get into DOS makes things soooo much easier. I also really hate the
default Windows Explorer file structure in W2K/XP, and all the separate
User shit. Yeah, I know the OS is designed for a multi-user workstation
environment, but that doesn't make it any less a PITA for single home
users like me.
Nonetheless, W2K is my main OS for the near future. I'll continue to
keep a load of XP on a backup machine, just so's I can have that OS --
and it's idiosyncrasies -- at my disposal. A few years down the road,
when it's time for me to make another "leap," I suspect I'll be looking
at some flavor of the Penguin. I'm in a position where I get my OS
software for next to nothing, and the XP version I have doesn't require
PA, but the movement toward M$ controlled DRM (and the recently
discussed new M$-dictated USB standard) scares the shit outta me.