In article news: said:
The VIA drivers for Linux have been around for some time and
mostly just need a little tweaking when a new chipset comes out.
The nForce drivers are much newer and there were stability
problems reported with nForce 2, but maybe that's all fixed now.
Hmm. Thanks for that. I'll keep on reading.
I'm not sure whether all the features of either board are
supported with free drivers. NVidia are better at providing
closed drivers, but closed drivers of any sort, especially if
your data integrity's relying on them, are preferably avoided.
I do see that the kernel now has VIA SATA support, but I don't
see any for nForce.
I run Gentoo, so I'd definitely prefer to see sourcecode
distribution of drivers.
VIA don't seem terribly good at providing source - the MPEG
acceleration hardware in the M10000 board has support from VIA in
the form of binary drivers for various distros, but what source
drivers are available are all reverse-engineered jobbies.
I can't see any good reason why VIA should want not to distribute
their drivers as source -- it's not as though their competitors are
suddenly going to start selling rival drivers for features supported
only be VIA hardware!
Do the latest nForce boards have SATA integrated into the
Southbridge, or do VIA still have the lead there? That's another
potential issue.
TBH I can't see the point of SATA. It's data bus is faster than the
hardware by even more than PATA-100 (or 133), it's wiring is a bit
neater, its connectors are a bit flaky-looking - where's the
advantage? When disks appear that can actually deliver a sustained
150MB/s I'll look again.
Cheers,
Daniel.