Wayne M. Poe said:
You don't need Vista. If you have a good running XP Pro installation, save
money and build a quad core system and have something truly fast. If you
have XP Home, save money, get Pro, then build Dual or Quad Core and enjoy
a truly fast system.
Don't get sucked into the über graphical GUI. You need a high horsepower
system just to run in it very well. Put XP on said system and you'll get
an extremely fast and relatively light weight OS. All the extra DRM just
adds insult to injury in my book. Factor in the high cost (a new copy of
XP Pro is a fraction of the cost.)
If you need a super graphical interface, get Win Blinds and any of the
Widget software that's been floating out there for years. If you're
worried about DX 10. First, you wont really have software that really uses
it for some time. Second, DX 9 and lower is actually emulated and games
and such that use it run slower on Vista than on XP Pro on the same system
(according to many reviewer I've read.) Lastly, DX 10 will be released or
ported some way or another; the fewer the people that buy Vista will help
expedite this.
So please don't buy into the hype. Please don't waste your money. Stick
with XP (or what ever current OS) if it does everything you need and works
well for you. Please send Redmond a strong message.
Just read this post and all the replies to date . . . I just have one
question for those that don't use Vista and have no plans to install it any
time soon . . .
What are you doing in a Vista group to begin with???
Most of us here have installed Vista, either recently or have been using
Beta and/or RTM versions . . . and we're here either looking for, or giving,
help with problems, so why waste your time, our time and bandwidth with
"Vista blows" or whatever posts?
If you're sticking with XP, great, I have 2 other machines that are going to
stay with XP simply because I see no reason to upgrade them just yet, but my
day-to-day machine has Vista, and has had it since the RTM version came out
as its only OS, removed XP from the boot-menu after a week of running RTM
since I never booted XP after installing Vista RTM.
Hell, if you're running DOS with the DOSSHELL and it works for you,
WONDERFUL! At my previous job we had a computer running DOS and Lotus 1-2-3
to track inventory and in-house charge accounts, worked just fine, and
backups were so simple! (Just copied the floppy that everything was running
on to another floppy every day)
Point is, what IS the point of bashing something you don't use, or touting
advice about aforementioned 'something' when you weren't asked for said
advice, and shouldn't be GIVING said advice since you don't have first hand
knowledge of said 'something'?
Pointless . . . that would be like going into a Lexus forum and telling
everyone not to buy a new model Lexus because the old one works just fine,
and the new one has some bugs because it's a new design. Yes, you would be
correct, but you know what? People in a Lexus forum/newsgroup DON'T CARE
for that advice, they are there because they have, or want, a Lexus and
want to talk to others about it, and maybe ask for some help if they need
it, or give help if someone asks and they know the answer . . .
Okay, I'm done feeding the Trolls for the day . . .
Mic