J
John Fitzsimons
"»Q«" <[email protected]>:[about newsreaders]I think that should work fine, letting people easily see all theSee if those subcategories look better now - are other changes
needed?
http://www.pricelessware.org/2004/PL2004CategoryIndex.htm
choices. On the eventual PL page, I think it might be a good idea to
have the 'newsreader' and 'newsreader: binary' subcategories right next
to each other, with 'newsreader tools' below them, but that's no
biggie.
Agree, I like the change to how it's laid out now.
(Note there's just one entry under newsreader tool: a trivial F/Agent add-on,
which I can't see as making it to Pricelessware.)
AGO ? A superb tool. If it hasn't been nominated, and seconded, yet
then I nominate it, or second it, now.
Since yEnc gained popularity, a /lot/ of users of apps which do not support
it have found their way to news.software.readers to ask for
suggestioned readers that can decode it. [...]
Since it's a widely-sought feature for binary users, seem it'd be a good
help for PL2004 winners to have their yenc support mentioned as part of
their descriptions? (A "find" on the current nominations page brings up
only 2 hits as now.)
Online AND offline functionality in newsreaders is also a
widely-sought feature. Newreaders that DON'T have that should also
have that mentioned as part of their descriptions.
Regards, John.
--
****************************************************
,-._|\ (A.C.F FAQ) http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/faq.html
/ Oz \ John Fitzsimons - Melbourne, Australia.
\_,--.x/ http://www.aspects.org.au/index.htm
v http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/