PC for 13 yo grandson

  • Thread starter Thread starter RA
  • Start date Start date
Matt said:
That's worth it.


Not worth it since the 2700+ (Thoroughbred) has half as much cache as
the 2500+ (Barton).
Click to expand...

The 2700+ has a much faster clock speed though(2.166 vs 1.833 for the 2500+)
Many applications don't benefit that much from the larger cache, and the
higher clock speed of the 2700+ is much more important.
 
If you want to argue semantics over a buck, you win.
What's that supposed to mean? :-)
Click to expand...

it means he can't come right out and admit a mistake even something so
petty
 
I think I already did that. See previous post:
"Ok, I was wrong..."

The point being that "same" price and a dollar difference is hardly
worth being challenged on.

Fitz
 
Back
Top