B
billurie
Sharon said:Bill, I realized your intention but thought that you may be following the
wrong tack on trying to dig up the mention of the IP number (that number is
also hard coded into Internet Connection Sharing.) I wasn't trying to cloud
the issue for you. I was trying to dissect it further so that you could
take the pieces and put them back together in a way that would work for
you.
Richard (COB) uses the camera successfully. I don't know if it's the same
camera or completely different but he's worked around the Intel software
issue by not using it.
I don't know about you but it sounds like there's a good chance that the
camera you have is not a lost cause. Instead it sounds like you need to
find alternatives to its software to be able to use it. **************************************************************************>
Sorry if you feel I derailed your thread a bit.
Not at all, Sharon. I hope I didn't give the impression that I thought so.
That surely wasn't my intention.
Of course not. Reading these pages one never finds you other than
friendly and well-intentioned and tolerant (others please note).
Of course, Sharon. But with the software I have, XP>>SP2 and what IntelYou're one of the regulars in these newsgroups and was just
trying to lend a helping hand.
Best regards,
sold me, purpoortedly to make their camera work with SP2, Richard has
told us that it can't be done. And what he did get from Intel that I
now can't he did make his work. So it all adds up to one thing:
I should quit the Don Quixote act and hope I have better success
with my new Creative camera, and their software.