Old moherboard RAM upgrade.

[Rod Speed]

What, copying files to a directory? Opening a text file in notepad?


Those operations are trivial.

You dont know that they wont go faster than currently, ****wit child.

 

[Mitch Crane]

You dont know that they wont go faster than currently, ****wit child.

Yes, I'm sure notepad will run like hellfire with that extra uncachable
64MB on that outdated tagram deficient board. The wasted time and money
will be well worth it to see notepad fly like the wind.

 

[Mitch Crane]

I didnt.


Wrong, as always. Read his original post.


That is what he has already got.

Then why did you recomend he get it. Damn, you really have lost it.

***************************************************************
*>>>>>> Unless OP finds a very limited supply of SIMMs, *
*>>>>>> he can just buy 2 x 32MB and try it with 64MB total, *
*>>>>>> buying a couple more SIMMs if it seems necessary. *
*> *
*>>>>> Duh. Thats what I said too. *
***************************************************************

Duh, that's what you said, too.

HES GOT 64M NOW, cretin.

Makes one wonder why you recomended he buy 64MB and try that. He's
already got it. What a maroon. Stop giving out advice. You suck at it.

You're lying now.

I admit it. You obviously knew nothing of the sort. You were just
guessing. I was trying to be polite, because you seem so unstable.

Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.

There you go again--contradicting yourself.

 

[johannes]

[...]

Nope, adding more ram to the current board will produce a very acceptible
performance with the current board and will be much cheaper.

Maybe cheaper, but it's a dead end. The money would be better spent
towards a more modern system, it can still be relatively cheap ~£100.

 

[Rod Speed]

Rod Speed wrote

Maybe cheaper,

No maybe about it.

but it's a dead end.

Doesnt matter, its a dedicated jukebox, not a personal desktop machine.

The money would be better spent towards a more modern system,

Nope, not when its a dedicated jukebox. All it needs is an acceptible performance
when manipulating the files etc. It will always play the files properly.

it can still be relatively cheap ~£100.

Thats a hell of a lot more than just doubling the memory.

 

[Rod Speed]

Then why did you recomend he get it.

I didnt. He asked whether ADDING 64M TO THE CURRENT 64M
WOULD WORK WITH A PARTICULAR PAIR OF SIMMS. I said
that he hadnt said whether the original were FP or EDO and said
how he could end up with 128M in either case.

Damn, you really have lost it.

We'll see...

***************************************************************
*>>>>>> Unless OP finds a very limited supply of SIMMs, *
*>>>>>> he can just buy 2 x 32MB and try it with 64MB total, *
*>>>>>> buying a couple more SIMMs if it seems necessary. *

*>>>>> Duh. Thats what I said too. *
***************************************************************

Duh, that's what you said, too.

I was just commenting on that last bit, adding a couple
more SIMMs if it seems necessary. He has ALREADY
decided that it seems necessary with 64M.

I pointed out that it wont affect the PLAYING of the music files but
that it would likely be more responsive when doing other maintenance.
Based on how 2K performs with 64M and 128M of ram.

Makes one wonder why you recomended he buy 64MB and try that.

Pity I never ever did.

He's already got it. What a maroon. Stop giving out advice. You suck at it.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

I admit it. You obviously knew nothing of the sort. You were just
guessing. I was trying to be polite, because you seem so unstable.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

There you go again--contradicting yourself.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

 

[Rod Speed]

Yes, I'm sure notepad will run like hellfire with that extra
uncachable 64MB on that outdated tagram deficient board.

You dont know that he even uses notepad on that system, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist.

The wasted time and money will be well
worth it to see notepad fly like the wind.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

 

[Mitch Crane]

You dont know that he even uses notepad on that system, you pathetic
excuse for a bullshit artist.

True. He might use EDLIN, which definitely requires at least 128MB.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

True. I'd just walk out of the opening. Why do you always suggest people do
silly things? Opening bags using cow dung. Installing 128MB to make
notepad.exe faster. Buying 64MB of RAM to replace the working 64MB you
already have. Telling people they should run Win2k on a machine that can't
even cache more than 64MB. You have a lot of issues.

What's next? You'll claim you're almost never wrong again? With a grasp on
reality like yours I think you should stop typing what the voices in your
head are telling you, Mr. Usekook.

 

[Mitch Crane]

I didnt.

As far as you know.

Wrong, as always. Read his original post.

Read your own posts. On second thought, don't I wouldn't even recomend them
to you.

That is what he has already got.

The why would you suggest he throw it away and buy another 64MB. Kooky, to
say the least.

HES GOT 64M NOW, cretin.


You're lying now.

Yeah. I'm lying. Right.

kony: Unless OP finds a very limited supply of SIMMs, he can just buy 2 x
32MB and try it with 64MB total, buying a couple more SIMMs if it seems
necessary.

Ron: Duh. Thats what I said too.

That wasn't you who replied, "Duh. Thats what I said too." It was the
voices in your head.

Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.

See your contradictions (new and quoted), Usekook. I doubt that you can.
You're almost always right and all that.

 

[Mitch Crane]

I didnt. He asked whether ADDING 64M TO THE CURRENT 64M
WOULD WORK WITH A PARTICULAR PAIR OF SIMMS. I said
that he hadnt said whether the original were FP or EDO and said
how he could end up with 128M in either case.


We'll see...

Yes we did.

I was just commenting on that last bit, adding a couple
more SIMMs if it seems necessary. He has ALREADY
decided that it seems necessary with 64M.

"try it with 64MB total"

Ron: Duh, that's what you said, too.

Yes, we saw. And you call other people liars.

I pointed out that it wont affect the PLAYING of the music files but
that it would likely be more responsive when doing other maintenance.
Based on how 2K performs with 64M and 128M of ram.

Yeah, I know. You said in effect that notepad and file copying would be
noticeably faster with 128MB. Or maybe you thought he'd manage his music
files using a 3D rendering app or Photoshop.

So your advice was that he should remove his current 64MB and replace it
with another 64MB then if that was just as slow as the original 64MB he
could buy another 64MB to add to the 64MB that didn't get faster the
second time around. Good advice. Oh, I know, you don't remember giving
that advice. Not surprising.

Pity I never ever did.

Pity you don't even know what it is you type.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

Cute grammatically nonsenical catch phrase. I guess that's what makes you
"almost never wrong".

 

[Mitch Crane]

Doesnt matter, its a dedicated jukebox, not a personal desktop
machine.

Good reason not to waste money sticking more RAM in the machine to run an
OS and an amount of RAM it supports very, very poorly.

Nope, not when its a dedicated jukebox. All it needs is an acceptible
performance when manipulating the files etc. It will always play the
files properly.

Which is why it only needs the 64MB it has, not the 64MB you think he
should replace that 64MB with and then later add another 64MB too. You
could have at least suggested he supplement the new 64MB using the
original 64MB rather than throw working RAM away and buy more. Strange.

Thats a hell of a lot more than just doubling the memory.

Tripling. You wanted him to buy 128MB more, 64MB at a time. Ok, doubling.
I forgot you never told him to put the original 64MB back in, so I guess
it doesn't count except in terms of cost. All for little or no gain (and
maybe even a loss in performance), but what the hell, it's not your
money.

 

[Rod Speed]

Not quite, its also used for web browsing in the living room.

Good reason not to waste money sticking more RAM in the machine
to run an OS and an amount of RAM it supports very, very poorly.

That last is completely mindless. The ONLY thing it lacks is caching
of ram above 64M and you aint established that the uses for which
that particular machine is put to will be significantly affected by that.

Makes a lot of sense to increase the ram so its more convenient to
use when that can be done cheaply, as it can since it takes simms.

Which is why it only needs the 64MB it has,

You get no say on that. The OP has decided he'd like better performance
and he should get that fine by increasing the ram when running 2K.

not the 64MB you think he should replace that 64MB with

I never ever said that.

and then later add another 64MB too.

Or that.

You could have at least suggested he supplement
the new 64MB using the original 64MB

That is precisely what I did, fool.

rather than throw working RAM away and buy more.

I never suggested that he should throw out the working ram unless it
happens to be different to what he can readily obtain for the extra ram.

Strange.

In your case, grossly incompetant. You cant even
manage to read and comprehend what is actually said.

And you clearly cant bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

Wrong.

You wanted him to buy 128MB more, 64MB at a time.

Another pig ignorant lie.

Ok, doubling.

Pathetic, really.

I forgot you never told him to put the original 64MB back in,

Didnt need to given that I never told him to remove it either.

so I guess it doesn't count except in terms of cost. All for little or no gain

Mindless silly stuff when its using virtual memory instead of physical ram.

(and maybe even a loss in performance),

Just another of your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasys.

but what the hell, it's not your money.

He's said he isnt interested in replacing the motherboard.

You get to like that or lump it.

 

[Rod Speed]

Yes we did.

Yep, you with egg all over your pathetic little face, as always.

"try it with 64MB total"

Ron: Duh, that's what you said, too.

No I didnt, you silly little pathological liar.

Yes, we saw. And you call other people liars.

Just you, child.

Yeah, I know. You said in effect that notepad

I never ever mentioned notepad, you silly little pathological liar.

and file copying would be noticeably faster with 128MB.

I never ever said that either, you silly little pathological liar.

Or maybe you thought he'd manage his music
files using a 3D rendering app or Photoshop.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

So your advice was that he should remove his
current 64MB and replace it with another 64MB

I never ever said that either, you silly little pathological liar.

then if that was just as slow as the original 64MB
he could buy another 64MB to add to the 64MB
that didn't get faster the second time around.

I never ever said that either, you silly little pathological liar.

Good advice. Oh, I know, you don't remember giving that advice.

I never ever said that either, you silly little pathological liar.

Not surprising.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

Pity you don't even know what it is you type.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

Cute grammatically nonsenical catch phrase.
I guess that's what makes you "almost never wrong".

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

 

[Rod Speed]

As far as you know.

You'd have quoted it if I had. You didnt, even you realise you lied.

Read your own posts.

Dont need to, I know what I wrote.

On second thought, don't I wouldn't even recomend them to you.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

The why would you suggest he throw it away and buy another 64MB.

I never ever did anything of the sort, you silly little pathological liar.

Yeah. I'm lying. Right.

Fraid so.

kony: Unless OP finds a very limited supply of SIMMs,
he can just buy 2 x 32MB and try it with 64MB total,
buying a couple more SIMMs if it seems necessary.

Ron: Duh. Thats what I said too.

It was the LAST bit of that that I had said, you silly little pathological liar.

That wasn't you who replied, "Duh. Thats what I said too." It was the
voices in your head.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

See your contradictions (new and quoted), Usekook.
I doubt that you can. You're almost always right and all that.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

 

[Rod Speed]

True. He might use EDLIN, which definitely requires at least 128MB.

You dont know that he even uses any editor on that
system, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist.

True. I'd just walk out of the opening. Why do you always suggest
people do silly things? Opening bags using cow dung. Installing 128MB
to make notepad.exe faster. Buying 64MB of RAM to replace the working
64MB you already have. Telling people they should run Win2k on a
machine that can't even cache more than 64MB. You have a lot of issues.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

What's next? You'll claim you're almost never wrong again?
With a grasp on reality like yours I think you should stop typing
what the voices in your head are telling you, Mr. Usekook.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

 

[Mitch Crane]

Not quite, its also used for web browsing in the living room.

There you go, contradicting yourself again.

That last is completely mindless. The ONLY thing it lacks is caching
of ram above 64M and you aint established that the uses for which
that particular machine is put to will be significantly affected by
that.

You who are recommending that he sink more money into an antiquated
machine that can't adequately support the amount of RAM you think it
needs to run acceptably should offer some evidence. You're just guessing,
however.

Makes a lot of sense to increase the ram so its more convenient to
use when that can be done cheaply, as it can since it takes simms.

Your contradictory rantings make no sense.

You get no say on that. The OP has decided he'd like better
performance and he should get that fine by increasing the ram when
running 2K.

He could get that by using a board that was made in an era when OSes
requiring 128MB existed.

I never ever said that.


Or that.

Sorry, I can never tell which of your personalities is typing. Not that I
mean to imply you have a personality or anything. I'd really have to be a
bullshit artist to pull that lie off.

That is precisely what I did, fool.

No you didn't You suggested that he try 64MB *total*, but now you say he
already had 64MB total, so one has to wonder why you suggested he try
what you claim isn't enough. You need to get your contradictions sorted
out.

I never suggested that he should throw out the working ram unless it
happens to be different to what he can readily obtain for the extra
ram.

Yes, I have to retract that remark. My apologies. You didn't tell him to
throw it away, just take it out and put in the new 64MB for a *total* of
64MB. He clould always make tie clips or something from the old sticks.

In your case, grossly incompetant. You cant even
manage to read and comprehend what is actually said.

Coming from a person who can't even remember his own contradictory
statements. First 64MB isn't enough because it will always be paging,
then he should try 64MB, then he already has 64MB so you never said that
(even though you did "duh"), then it's just a jukebox, then it's not,
then copying files and using notepad requires 128MB, then you never said
what you clearly said, then you clearly said the thing you didn't say. I
know, that isn't the exact order of your contradictions, but can you
blame me. If you, the author can't keep your nonsense straight then how
can I?

And you clearly cant bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

As I said, there are better ways to get out of paper bags.

Wronger.


Another pig ignorant lie.

Your squirming to hide your lies and contradictions is cute.

Pathetic, really.

I agree. Claiming that your suggestion is cheaper and then telling him to
replace his working RAM with the same amount of RAM he already has.

Didnt need to given that I never told him to remove it either.

How else would he try 64MB *total* using the the new 64MB you suggested
he buy? Have you ever seen the inside of a computer?

Mindless silly stuff when its using virtual memory instead of physical
ram.

Virtual memory and RAM are two different things. His apps won't be
running out of virtual memory, but if he takes your advice they may be
running in uncacheable memory on a machine that already has an antiquated
archetecture.

Just another of your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasys.

Oh, so now you claim that the cache doesn't do anything anyway. Wait, I
know, you didn't mean it like that. Keep squirming.

He's said he isnt interested in replacing the motherboard.

You get to like that or lump it.

I don't get to do either, but for the cost of shipping I'd be happy to
send him a working P2B with a Pentium II that runs Win2k fine (tested
with 768MB [not included]). All for the cost of shipping. Hell, I only
paid $1 for it (the rest of the computer and another lesser computer
which went straight into the trash) at an auction.

 

[Mitch Crane]

No I didnt, you silly little pathological liar.

Correct. iwas more like this:

Just you, child.

Oh dear. Caught in another lie.

I never ever mentioned notepad, you silly little pathological liar.

That's right. You thought it took some huge app to manage a playlist. I was
just pointing out how silly you are. Which just points out how silly I am.
Your silliness is as obvious as the be red rubber nose on your face.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

Yet you keep on trying. Funny how something can be both sad and admirable
at the same time.

Everything I've attributed to you was either explicitly or implicitly
stated whether you were aware of it or not. Who knew you would fall to
pieces so easily? I'm disappointed.

 

[Mitch Crane]

You'd have quoted it if I had. You didnt, even you realise you lied.

I've quoted it multiple times. Not that you'd recognize your own
contradictory statements.

Dont need to, I know what I wrote.

Ah, so you feign memory loss.

It was the LAST bit of that that I had said, you silly little
pathological liar.

Yes it was, which means I was truthful in my attribution and you lied
when you claimed not to have said it. Yet you just claimed in another
post that if you had said it I'd have quoted it. There's your quote.
Going to feign memory loss again?

 

[Mitch Crane]

You dont know that he even uses any editor on that
system, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist.

I only know you said managing his playlists and putting songs on the
machine was reason to go to 128MB, Mr. Usekook.

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D0eux?=]

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

Why don't you get some new material, you sophomoric, semi-literate ****wit?