M
Mxsmanic
coolsti said:One thing is definitely true today: an anti-virus software is absolutely
necessary.
Not true. Virus infections can be avoided by practicing safe
computing.
coolsti said:One thing is definitely true today: an anti-virus software is absolutely
necessary.
Mxsmanic said:Not true. Virus infections can be avoided by practicing safe
computing.
JAD said:you never know when there is a hole in your condom or the rhythm method
could fail.............anti-virus for the average user is a MUST!.
Jack said:Because that will cause problems in a wide range of applications,
as Microsoft points out in about a dozen different places in their
knowledge base. XP should have a pagefile, even if it's a small
one (e.g. 64 or 128MB).
Randella said:No where in computer theory or practice is a page file required.
The reason M$ uses a page file at all is because the ancient systems
didn't have enough memory to load all the programs into memory. Memory
used to be expensive...
Again, Rod I have a server loaded with Server 2003 that supports 200+
users a day and has been running without a page file for almost 3 years
now. So I do have the experience you are lacking
Randella said:Yes JAD, one of my thousands of servers
coolsti said:Bob,
in reference to your reply and the followups in this thread, "getting rid
of Norton" is not helpful or even sound advice. I am the very first to
agree that Norton has become too overly aggressive in taking control of a
PC in its war to protect it. I hate programs that are meant to do a
service (here, protect against malware) but wind up practically taking
over the operating system. But Norton is indeed a high quality software,
and with proper tweaking of the options (as administrator) Norton will
learn to behave itself a bit.
If Norton is set up properly, or temporarily disabled (for example in
services) then it should not be the cause of the poster's excessive
hardisk activity.
One thing is definitely true today: an anti-virus software is absolutely
necessary. Norton may not be the best, I am using a freeware myself, but
something has to be there.
To the poster: I personally on another computer have Norton Anti-Virus,
but not any of the other Norton utilities. In deference to Bob's idea,
perhaps disabling a lot of Norton's various protections other than
anti-virus may be a good idea in general. I remember one time I installed
an operating system with a full version of Norton's system and was totally
irritated by its way of creating hidden recovery files on my hardisk. That
is one that I uninstalled right away.
Randella said:Jack F. Twist wrote
No where in computer theory or practice is a page file required.
Wrong.
The reason M$ uses a page file at all is because the ancient
systems didn't have enough memory to load all the programs
into memory. Memory used to be expensive...
Again, Rod I have a server loaded with Server 2003 that supports 200+
users a day and has been running without a page file for almost 3 years now.
So I do have the experience you are lacking
and we have had no problems or complaints.
But I forgot you programmed with FAT12.
You and Bill eh? How is Bill by the way?
Randella said:Rod,
Do you ever offer solutions or intelligence or do you just stil at a
computer and type the same phrases over and over again?
Randella said:Do you ever offer solutions or intelligence
or do you just stil at a computer and type
the same phrases over and over again?
Randella said:Jack,
Have you ever tried?
Although I do agree with you, modern programs are built to look for a
page file. I disagree because I am running photoshop right now, they
will work with out one.