B
Bremmer
You have got some good advice in the replies here except from measekite
who
never gives credible advice.
Do yourself a favour and just ignore him.
Good advice Tony, thanks.
You have got some good advice in the replies here except from measekite
who
never gives credible advice.
Do yourself a favour and just ignore him.
Davy said:I remember using a system once that had four computers and one printer
and a 'switch box' on Win 98, about the simplest for any computer
unless you want to start configuring and installing.
Simply plug in and switch and they don't need a power cord, not all
the leads in the cable needs to be switched.
Davy
Many thanks for your reply. I'm pretty sure that both PCs have
available PCI slots. However, the remote PC is running the word
processor in pure DOS mode. The PC with the printer attached is usually
running Windows 98 normally, but it may be in pure DOS mode as well if
the user is running the same word processor. Is networking still
achivable given this scenario?
PCI slots. However, the remote PC is running the word processor in pure DOS
mode. The PC with the printer attached is usually running Windows 98
normally, but it may be in pure DOS mode as well if the user is running the
same word processor. Is networking still achivable given this scenario?
Thanks again
zakezuke said:<edit mine>
Public relations for whom?
Frank said:I am beyond stupid.
Frank
Bremmer said:Many thanks for your reply. I'm pretty sure that both PCs have available
PCI slots. However, the remote PC is running the word processor in pure DOS
mode. The PC with the printer attached is usually running Windows 98
normally, but it may be in pure DOS mode as well if the user is running the
same word processor. Is networking still achivable given this scenario?
Thanks again.
Bremmer said:Good advice Tony Da Tiger, thanks.