Tramp said:
|why not do as tramp does = post
|links and reviews [snip]
3. I don't download/test most of the software that I post
about. I don't have an interest in a lot of the programs I
post. All I am doing is saying "Hey, here is a program
that says it's freeware that does this"
You don't check *anything*? So, you're saying that if a
website says it has a freeware program to download you
don't check the integrity of that statement. You just post
it's location.
For me, I try my best to check...but sometimes it is hard.
For example, I remember one piece was freeware and all of the
sudden it has changed into shareware. The site looks the same
(and I used the program a while ago), but when one click on
the link it leads you to pay.
Another example is that TechPro, it looked quite good at its
first glance, I even downloaded it and installed it myself and
didnt know that it would nag you a little bit until someone
here actually pointed it out.
I am sure we'd all try our best to dig out real goodies. Yet
from time to time, something dim to go wrong, even just by
propability (for me, I found that sometimes 1 out of 10 could
go wrong). I guess one of the good thing in this group is
that everyone who read the posts could also help to check,
give us a heads up and post it here, too.
--
RL
Unofficial Adaware Updater; Little (File) Backer Upper; Uptime
Quickie; Tray Quickie; Google Quickie; Lefty Animated
Cursors;
http://home.earthlink.net/~ringomei/page2.html
*******************************************
Places that host a list of the Pricelessware annual voting
results and information:
http://www.pricelessware.org,
http://www.pricelesswarehome.org