Michael Daly said:
You're being wildy optimistic.
Nope, we know what happens with wiring in buildings that burn.
Having spent years as a civil engineer before getting into computers, I know for a fact that this
is true.
No you dont, and you cant explain the effect you dont get
with high temperature ovens when you open the door either.
I've got far more training in designing fire safety into buildings than you'll ever pretend to
have.
You have absolutely no way of knowing what I have.
And even someone as stupid as you doesnt need 'training' on
something as basic as the silly claim you made about IR 'pinhole
lenses' when even the most basic consideration of what happens
with high temperature furnaces doesnt produce that effect.
VERY basic engineering in fact.
There are well-documented cases of fires spreading through holes drilled and filled with telephone
wires.
But not a single hole small enough for a Cat5 cable thru
a hole in the decent insulation seen with a fire proof safe.
A Cat5 data cable is trivially different from a Cat 3 telco line when it comes to fire resistance.
Yes, but there is the tiny matter of the difference between
a single hole just big enough for a single Cat5 and a much
bigger hole used to feed a much bigger multicore cable thru.
Even plenum rated Cat5 won't hold up.
Bullshit when its thru a minimum hole in a
fire rated wall done as per the standards.
Just did with the furnace door.
Nothing is "fire proof". There are varying degrees of fire resistance
Duh. And a 3 hour fire rating is all you need for a house.
and making holes in a little box is not going to make it fire proof. No matter how airtight a box,
you still have to contend
with the fact that eventually the insulation lets the heat in.
Eventually is completely irrelevant, all you need is
long enough till the apes with fire hoses show up.
That's the difference between a pinhole lens and a big hole.
There is no 'lens' and basic physic shows
that **** all energy gets thru a pinhole.
And even if you had a pinhole lens, and you dont, all that
would produce is an image of the fire outside that hole.
Its completely trivial to prove that **** all energy gets thru
a pinhole, by putting a plate in front of that open door.
You wouldnt even burn your hand if you put it a bit away
from the hole, let alone see the room catch fire when you did.
You get FAR more IR energy thru the open door than you
will ever get with a pinhole, and that clearly doesnt set fire
to the room the furnace is in when the door is opened.
You've just made a VERY spectacular fool of yourself and
you should do the decent thing and turn in whatever clearly
worthless paper you got at the end of that 'training', you
clearly dont have a ****ing clue about the most basic physics.
And they can be used to control temps in such a room.
But they arent in practice.
Try to keep the temps down with any other means.
Thats done by the apes with fire hoses that show up in
****ing great trucks with sirens wailing when it turns out
that the sprinklers didnt stop the fire from getting going.
How do you contain halon in a half room?
Just a small cabinet sized housing is all you need.
The only way halon is useful is if the area protected is substantial in size.
Wrong again. Its main purpose is to put out the initial
combustion in situations where sprinklers are undesirable.
Otherwise, the heat buildup will cause hardware damage. You don't seem to realize the
temperatures that are reached in building fires.
Wrong again, they are clearly spelt out in the
requirements for fire rated data safes etc.
BTW Your obnoxious responses to everyone you disagree with is rather childish.
Your desperate attempts to bullshit your way out of your predicament in spades.
Any 2 year old could leave that for dead. Get on to help you before commenting
again, if anyone is actually stupid enough to let you anywhere near one.
Rule of Holes. When you are in one, STOP DIGGING.