NaDa 0.5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grant Abraham
  • Start date Start date
Hundreds of links? *looks at the original post* Hmm...maybe my math
is off, but I see one...

Imagine if we all posted messages with no explanations, just links?
You cannot defend a faulty behavior by saying that only a few do it in
this newsgroup.

Snipping unnecessary parts is the standard behaviour, no need to
indicate that you have done what should be done and what all
responsible people do routinely.

Of course I have snipped unnecessary parts of the message I reply to,
no need to tell you that. And I never snip in a way which
misrepresents what earlier writers have said, I take the significant
part of their messages to show the reader the context.

If you want to know exactly who said what you can count arrows and
look up previous messages.

This is standard practise in usenet.
None of which changes the fact that it is poor netiquette to strip
attributions, and trimming posts without indicating that you've done
so.

You have very dim concepts of netiquette. You are defending the
practise of writing messages which are totally impossible to
understand without looking things up on the web.
That is what we are talking about.
Don't try to change the subject.
 
Why....it should be obvious! 80)>

"Well, I looked from the porch to the top of the wall,
Nothin' was there, nothin' at all.
Nothin' at all in any degree,
A predominance of vacancy"

There's a man in this town, goin' around,
Spreadin' nothin' all over the ground.
Heard some passin' people say,
"All that nothin' gets in the way..
There oughta be a law.

I went downtown, some nothin' to buy..
Pile in the window, 40 feet high.
The man in the store, he smile an' say..
'We got plenty o' nothin' today.
All vacuum packed....

Well, this song was written with nothin' in mind
Nothin' at all of any kind.
Nothin' at all in any respect..
We was aided by a poverty of intellect......
 
Back
Top