C
Cor Ligthert [MVP]
I typed "realy" and thought "workerprocess"
really be hug if it is in an ASPNET application and use more time than the
................................................................
By the way if you need data only for showing, than you can set your data in
a shared/static class.
That data stays in your server as long as there are sessions active for your
application (including session time). So you have to make a procedure in a
way that it refresh if the application stops. If it is a 24 hours used
application (which never will stop), than you have also to make something to
force cleaning up.
If you need a sample for this, reply than I copy something (although that is
than simple VB.Net).
I hope this helps,
Cor
What is your advantage in this, that workerprocess should in my opinionWhat is your advantage in this, that really should in my opinion really be
hug if it is in an ASPNET application more than the processing needed for
the threads and the checking of those are ready(it is not your code
however what is needed)?
really be hug if it is in an ASPNET application and use more time than the
................................................................
By the way if you need data only for showing, than you can set your data in
a shared/static class.
That data stays in your server as long as there are sessions active for your
application (including session time). So you have to make a procedure in a
way that it refresh if the application stops. If it is a 24 hours used
application (which never will stop), than you have also to make something to
force cleaning up.
If you need a sample for this, reply than I copy something (although that is
than simple VB.Net).
I hope this helps,
Cor