We oppose SPP because MSFT can't make it correctly and they don't care.
That's why many of us are going to force them to stop it as they have been
forced to do many other things--using the federal courts.
Quick Message Rick: Much of the opposition to SPP has ***nothing*** to do
with support of piracy--it has to do with the significant percent of failure
of WGA that I have linked on this group. MSFT cannot hire developers who
can make accurate piracy ID code. They never will be able to. It is for
this reason they are going to be ordered in U.S. courts to stop the practice
of SPP, or enter into settlements after another expensive fiasco for their
stockholders brought to them by their friendly litigation team headed by
Brad Smith and Nancy Anderson, who have the same impact on the MSFT treasury
as Count Dracula on his best Halloween night.
No Mr. Rogers. "On ocassion" is not what statistically is happening with
WGA or will happen with SPP. A substantial percentage of the time is not
"on occassion" and I don't know where you got that nebulous phrase to apply
to this situation. I strongly recommend your reading the many links from Ed
Bott that I have posted on this group several times. I know you know who he
is, and I bet you own some of his books. I bet you buy his Windows Vista
Inside Out book that has already sold nearly a million copies from MSFT
Press.
You're making a huge mistake using such a broad brush to paint and
stereotype those of us who oppose WGA and SPP because it's as erratic and
ineffective as security at your airport. It's why security at the airport
is terrible when you wait in line right now. Every study done deploying
undercover agents to test every airport in the country shows them porous
with incompetent security--not the competence level an MVP strives for.
Much of what causes your line to take a long time is pandering to
superficial perceptions, not contributing to meaningful security.
Apparently you have bought into them hook, line, and "nutcase" sinker.
Fake IDs Fooling Feds
http://wildcat.arizona.edu/media/st...200610291531&sourcedomain=wildcat.arizona.edu
Right now, there are web sites set up by computer science grad students
that show how fake boarding passes and tickets can be made quickly, and this
huge vulnerability hasn't been challenged by any of Chertoff's ineffective
and incompetent bureaucracy or Fran Townsend at the West Wing and her
incompetent and totally ineffective bureaucracy who made fools of themselves
last week broadcasting warnings of NFL stadiums being all bombed at the same
time when the gamers were at different times and listed LOL an NFL stadium
that happens not to exist on the planet--a fake one. They're the Katrina
Kids--they killed people there and they'll continue to kill people with
their incompetence.
The safety belt is a lousy analogy. Safety belts save lives by the
thousands. There have also been safety belt blunt trauma injuries that are
significant but they are a very small fraction less than .001% in the trauma
literature. You live in a country that is also willing to accept 1000
deaths a year because they aren't lowering the front end of gas guzzling
terrorist funding large trucks that put the US at a disadvantage right now
as to national defense because the front end won't be legislatively lowered
until 2010. Meanwhile, Coingress has cheerfully accepted the 1000 deaths a
year caused by the high front ends in collisons with Non-SUVs which were
emphasized in testimony reported studies in hearings repeatedly. Welcome to
"born and died" in the USA--a line Springsteen left out.
Fortunately in Nine days, a lot of Republicans are going to be fired on a
Tuesday by 10PM. House control and subpoena power and oversight will be in
the hands of the Democrats. The Senate has an excellent chance of going
that way with many of the do nothing incompetents trailing this morning from
15-20%.
The Hill forecasts 20-35 Republican seats lost in the House and a huge
stampede of Independents towards the Democrats in the ABC news poll
announced this morning.
Since you're into MSFT Syncophancy, did you support their former lobbyist @
$27,000 per month until Ballmer fired him the day it hit the Seattle papers
and national media Ralph Reed? Ralph Reed was instrumental in helping
protect the Mariana Islands slavery and prostitution factory for young
imported Asisan girls; Reed was insturmental in the bribery scandle now
under investigation with a prison bus continually loading up for transport
from the West Wing to prison several times a year. The biggest load of
passengers will Board in 2007-2008. They won't be using Windows Vista for a
long long time or touching a PC or a Mac. No Ipods or Zunes for them
either.
Yeehaw as indifferent illiterate America sleeps:=--the activities of MSFT's
$27,000 lobbyist or Nancy Anderson and Brad Smith's attempts to protect SPP.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ralph+Reed+Jack+Abramoff
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Ralph+Reed+Mariana+Islands
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Susan++Ralston+Ralph+Reed&btnG=Search
2) Most MVPs Rick, are concerned with whether software works. I haven't
seen any MVP sites yet that want to endorse turning Windows Vista, Longhorn
Server, and Office 2007 into "reduced functionality mode" when it targets
legitimate copies of Windows.
I'm going to state this clearly and simply for you. Many of us opposed to
SPP, myself included have never used P2P or a Torrent to get MSFT software,
one mp3, or one movie or anything else free in our lifetimes although we
follow the technology closely. Torrents are now being started to deliver
legitimately purchased software efficiently and I doubt that has escaped
you. Many of us who oppose WGA and SPP and are ready to support efforts in
court to stop it, are big fans of MSFT. Some of us have been responsible
for pushing specific changes in Vista that are already in Escrow and some
that should be. They are changes like getting the Print teams to default a
port that will make thousands of peoples' XP print drivers work, protecting
system restore points, and a gamut of others that will make Mr. Rogers'
Vista run better.
We also communicate constructively to people in a position to make a clear
workable EULA, to protect MSFT software from piracy without having an
erratic SPP that kills legitimate machines.
Don't stereotype us as
Documentation of MSFT Runing a Significant not Occassional Number of Systems
with WGA/SPP
MSFT sued over WGA
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Spyware/?p=839
Additionally the Vista EULA abuses the user.
October 19, 2006
"Forbidding Vistas: Windows licensing disserves the user "
http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archi...tas_windows_licensing_disserves_the_user.html
by Wendy Selzer, EFF Staff Attorney
http://www.eff.org/
As Ed Bott and others have demonstrated MSFT reckless deployed WGA, forcing
it onto machines, which was erratic the same way,although it can be removed
surgicially .
Ed Bott is doing a stellar job of tracking this, analyzing, and critiquing
this and Ed Bott co-authors one of the most complete and authoritative
Windows references for every operating system including the one that has
pre-sold nearly a million copies, "Windows Vista Inside Out" by Microsoft
Press
http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/books/9361.asp
Ed Bott's Bookstore
http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?page_id=993
Ed Bott's Three Blogs
Ed Bott's Microsoft Report
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/
Ed Bott's Windows Expertise/Tips, tricks, news, and advice about Windows and
Office
http://www.edbott.com/weblog/
Ed Bott's Media Central
http://www.edbott.com/mediacenter/index.php
Ed Bott's Columns on MSFT's Site
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/meetexperts/bott.mspx
The author of one of the major books on Windows OS's and numerous
articles for MSFT over the year Ed Bott has taken MSFT to task for their
sloppy work with WGA repeatedly in the last few months and the same sloppy
work with SPP and MSFT has had totally ignorant spokes persons speak to
different questioners that are quoted on Ed's two blogs currently with the
most inane and no knowledgable defenses of WGA which does not work correctly
and SPP which will not work correctly immaginable. They are making a fool
of themselves with the implemenation of WGA and SPP and they are going to
learn to back off when it hits them in the area they worship--their money.
I want people to note this conversation because it speaks volumes about
MSFT's inane contracted support and MSFT's oversight of it and MSFT's
attitude as to how little it means when they represent themselves to their
customers--this is a conversation that Ed Bott had with "MSFT PSS" probably
Convergys of Ohio contracting:
From Ed Bott at
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=84
"I called Microsoft support to see if there is a hidden option to say, "yep,
I've got updates turned to manual: it's okay." The rep said, "No and why
wouldn't you want to get the latest updates to Windows."
I responded with the issues relating to WGA. He spent some time telling me
that WGA was a good thing, etc. I reiterated that I have accepted all the
updates except WGA and just want to review the updates before they're
installed on my machine.
He told me that "in the fall, having the latest WGA will become mandatory
and if its not installed, Windows will give a 30 day warning and when the 30
days is up and WGA isn't installed, Windows will stop working, so you might
as well install WGA now." [emphasis added]
I'm wondering if Microsoft has the right to disable Windows functionality or
the OS as a whole (tantamount to revoking my legitimate Windows license) if
I do not install every piece of software that they send it updates.
That can't be true, can it? I'm always suspicious of any report that comes
from a front-line tech support drone, so I sent a note to Microsoft asking
for an official confirmation or, better yet, a denial. Instead, I got this
terse response from a Microsoft spokesperson:
As we have mentioned previously, as the WGA Notifications program expands
in the future, customers may be required to participate. [emphasis added]
Microsoft is gathering feedback in select markets to learn how it can best
meet its customers' needs and will keep customers informed of any changes to
the program.
That's it. That's the entire response.
Uh-oh. Currently, Windows users have the ability to opt out of the Windows
Genuine Advantage program and still get security patches and other Critical
Updates delivered via Windows Update. The only thing you give up is the
ability to download optional updates. Hackers have been working overtime to
find ways to disable WGA notification. If WGA becomes mandatory, would it
mean that Microsoft could prevent Windows from working if it determines -
possibly erroneously - that your copy isn't "genuine"? That's a chilling
possibility, and Microsoft refuses an easy opportunity to deny that that
option is in its plans.
Over at Ed Bott's Windows Expertise, I've been soliciting feedback from
Windows users who've been burned by WGA. So far, I've received 20 comments.
Here's a sampling:
a.. I have an XP Media center with a promise RAID 0 4-disc array. When I
installed the WPA it broke the drivers for the array by causing failed
delayed writes (half of the array just "disapears".) If I do a system
restore to before the installation of the WPA everything goes back to
working just fine.
b..
ince installing WPA : I've had blue screens and a total inability
to boot. I had to run the XP repair function to get the computer to boot. I
had a damaged boot sector on the hard drive. I am running two drives on a
RAID 1 config.
c.. I purchased a SEALED OEM copy of XP Professional. WGA said the license
key was already used. I called MS and they said I should uninstall and buy
another copy. I told them I wasn't made of money and hung-up.
d.. Microsoft rejected the product key that came with the ThinkPad I'm
using. I had to call in and they gave me another code to enter which
supposedly worked but now I get the blue screen of death about every other
time I reboot. I've also lost all internet connectivity.
e.. I sent my Compaq Presario notebook for service repair, and it fails
the WGA check. I have a legal version of windows xp professional on it. But
I have no way to correct this problem.
What's most disturbing about this whole saga is Microsoft's complete lack of
transparency on the issue. And before the ABM crowd jumps in with
predictable "What did you expect?" comments, let me argue that Microsoft
actually has a fairly good track record on transparency issues in recent
years. Windows Product Activation is very well documented, and when a
similar uproar occurred in 2001, it was squelched quickly by some fairly
prominent postings from high-level executives who provided details without a
lot of spin. Likewise, the Microsoft Security Response Center has done an
exceptional job at providing quick responses to security issues. (Just ask
Adam Shostack.)
Currently, no one at Microsoft is blogging about this fiasco. No executive
has been quoted on the record about it. There are very few technical details
available, and those that have been published are being tumbled through the
spin machine and spit out as press releases.
If Microsoft really does plan to turn WGA into a kill switch in September,
be prepared for an enormous backlash."
From Ed Bott on October 5, 2006:
UAC Good; SPP Not So Good
http://www.edbott.com/weblog/
"SPP, on the other hand, is the successor to Windows Genuine Advantage. Both
initiatives have in common a reliance on Orwellian language that appears to
be in the customer's benefit but is actually a horrible inconvenience and
potentially a nightmare. Despite Microsoft's attempts to spin the new
program, there's no advantage for the Windows customer, and the only thing
being protected is Microsoft's revenue stream."
Microsoft Issues Warning to VLK Customers Over WGA Fail
http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=35401
Guess there will be a WGA "Kill Switch After All"
Published October 4, 2006 by Ed Bott
http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1495
Is Microsoft about to release a Windows "kill switch"?
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=84
Search on WGA
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/
October 4, 2006 For Vista, WGA gets Tougher
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=148
Ed Bott Blog Readers Burned by WGA
http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1370#comments
WGA is a Mess
http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1476
Microsoft Kill Switch in Windows Vista and threat to disable Windows (the
so-called Microsoft Software Protection Platform)
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=84
Microsoft's Software Protection Platform: Protecting Software and Customers
from Counterfeiters
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2006/oct06/10-04SoftwareProtection.mspx
Microsoft's Software Protection Platform: Protecting Software and Customers
from Counterfeiters
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2006/oct06/10-04SoftwareProtection.mspx
White Paper: Software Protection Platform: Innovations for Windows Vista
and Windows Server "Longhorn" Oct. 2006 (.doc file, 2.7 MB)
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2006/oct06/10-04SoftwareProtection.mspx
Microsoft Issues Warning to VLK Customers Over WGA Fail
http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=35401
Phil Liu of Microsoft has reported problems with the Windows Genuine
Advantage authentication method for Volume License Key (VLK) customers and a
temporary work-around.
"Just a heads up on an issue related to (Volume) VLK validation. On Monday
and Tuesday of this week (Oct 2-3), some VLK customers may have experienced
problems with WGA validation. If a Windows XP system with a VLK recently
began failing validation or reporting as non-genuine, then they may
experiencing this problem. The problem was the result of an issue on the
Microsoft server side, and we are still investigating the cause. We regret
any inconvenience this may have caused you, and I am personally working to
get the information you need to resolve this issue.
We do have steps available that affected customers can take to correct the
problem, and we'll continue to work on solutions and post them on this
forum."
Customers who are affected can:
1.. Delete the data.dat file from Cocuments and SettingsAll
UsersApplication DataWindows Genuine Advantagedata (The drive letter will
depend on where the OS was installed)
2.. Revisit http://www.microsoft.com/genuine/downloads/validate.aspx to
confirm that the machine is now genuine.
3.. Run wgatray.exe /b from the command line to ensure that the latest
validation is updated for WGA Notifications. This command may not be present
on the user's machine and should not be considered an error if it is not.
Please ensure that this is run as an Administrator. A reboot may be required
to remove all non-genuine notifications."
CH