Mailclient choice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Morgan Ohlson
  • Start date Start date
What do you mean by good? What's good for me may be totally useless for you.
Click to expand...


That's always true. The OP was asking for our recommendations. You're always
better off going by recommendations than throwing darts. :)

Bob

Remove "kins" to reply by e-mail.
 
someone here can help you with it. If you have been using OE for a while
you will be dissapointed with other e-mail clients you try.
Click to expand...

You need to try FoxMail. It's solid and reliable, yet it can be cutesy like
OE (if you want cute).

Bob

Remove "kins" to reply by e-mail.
 
And said:
[posted and mailed]

[posted and mailed]


Is there a free mailclient that is really a good choice?

What do you mean by good? What's good for me may be
totally useless for you. I use Eudora and it can be run
in Light (free with reduced functions) mode:

http://www.eudora.com/download/
Click to expand...

Why have you choosed that prior to Thunderbird and others?
Click to expand...

Because I have been using Eudora before Thunderbird was
even a glint in the programmer's eye. I'm not sure exactly
how long but I think it must be close to 15 years now! It's
a simple program with an easy to understand user interface
that does one thing and does it reasonably well.

http://www.eudora.com/presskit/backgrounder.html
Click to expand...

THe problem with Eudora is that it's UI is farily non-
intuitive. It's difficult to find things, and even the error
messages are obtuse. Worst email client I ever used.

--
:-) Christopher Jahn
:-(

http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html

There is no heavier burden than a great potential.
 
Christopher said:
And it came to pass that Ed wrote:




Outside of Outlook/OE, I don't know of any client that does.

That's why there's Hotmail POPper or Hot2POP.
Click to expand...

So, does that mean that I will always have to have two clients e.g.
Thunderbird (to read my tiscali mail) and OE (to read my Hotmail)?

Ed
 
Bob said:
You need to try FoxMail. It's solid and reliable, yet it can be cutesy like
OE (if you want cute).

Bob

Remove "kins" to reply by e-mail.
Click to expand...

What are the fundamental differences between Foxmail and Thunderbird?

Ed
 
And said:
So, does that mean that I will always have to have two
clients e.g. Thunderbird (to read my tiscali mail) and OE
(to read my Hotmail)?
Click to expand...

No. Read what I wrote.


--
:-) Christopher Jahn
:-(

http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html

Liberals don't believe they deserve anything they own;
conservatives think they're entitled to everything they've
stolen.
 
And said:
What are the fundamental differences between Foxmail and
Thunderbird?
Click to expand...

They are different programs, using different code bases and
different User Interfaces.

--
:-) Christopher Jahn
:-(

http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html

Liberals don't believe they deserve anything they own;
conservatives think they're entitled to everything they've
stolen.
 
They are different programs, using different code bases and
different User Interfaces.
Click to expand...

I guess he means conserning features... and that's interesting.

I like a small client, but it should handle a cople of mailboxes and
attachments!

Basicly the same as OE that is.... Which should be my best choice?


Morgan O.
 
What are the fundamental differences between Foxmail and Thunderbird?
Click to expand...


Functionally, not much. T-Bird is a lot bigger, and I think both FoxMail and
T-Bird are way too fat.

Here are some links to user reviews on Betanews.com. (Since the complaints
about Foxmail being in Chinese, the true English version was released.)

T-Bird= http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail.php3?fid=1057948436

FoxMail= http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail.php3?fid=1027468567



Bob

Remove "kins" to reply by e-mail.
 
Outside of Outlook/OE, I don't know of any client that does.

That's why there's Hotmail POPper or Hot2POP.
Click to expand...

Foxmail handles Hotmail.

Bob

Remove "kins" to reply by e-mail.
 
I guess he means conserning features... and that's interesting.
I like a small client, but it should handle a cople of mailboxes and
attachments!

Basicly the same as OE that is.... Which should be my best choice?


Morgan O.
Click to expand...

Well,
What did you decide on? My offer is still open to help configure OE to
what you want it to do or not to do. Another good resource for OE is
http://insideoe.tomsterdam.com/
 
And said:
[posted and mailed]

On Thu, 06 May 2004 16:55:54 GMT, Fuzzy Logic wrote:

[posted and mailed]


Is there a free mailclient that is really a good choice?

What do you mean by good? What's good for me may be
totally useless for you. I use Eudora and it can be run
in Light (free with reduced functions) mode:

http://www.eudora.com/download/

Why have you choosed that prior to Thunderbird and others?
Click to expand...

Because I have been using Eudora before Thunderbird was
even a glint in the programmer's eye. I'm not sure exactly
how long but I think it must be close to 15 years now! It's
a simple program with an easy to understand user interface
that does one thing and does it reasonably well.

http://www.eudora.com/presskit/backgrounder.html
Click to expand...

THe problem with Eudora is that it's UI is farily non-
intuitive. It's difficult to find things, and even the error
messages are obtuse. Worst email client I ever used.
Click to expand...

What's intuitive will depend a lot to what you are used to. I find it very
easy to navigate and customize. If you are used to another email client then
it may take some adjusting. There will always be a learning curve when you
switch applications.

PS what errors messages? I can't recall seeing one for a very long time.
 
Christopher Jahn said:
THe problem with Eudora is that it's UI is farily non-
intuitive. It's difficult to find things, and even the error
messages are obtuse. Worst email client I ever used.
Click to expand...


I find Eudora's UI just fine but as your mailboxes grow then it
seems to need more and more resources. Also I get the feeling that
the owner's of Eudora, Qualcomm, are not really interested in
keeping it up to date.

However, I REALLY do like its filtering capabilities and its
multiple accounts (which it calls "personalities" or "personas").

If other emailers could do those two things as well as Eudora then
maybe I would go and use them instead.

Franky



[groups widened]
 
Fuzzy Logic said:
What do you mean by good? What's good for me may be totally
useless for you. I use Eudora and it can be run in Light (free
with reduced functions) mode:

http://www.eudora.com/download/
Click to expand...


I shouldn't really say this but why not just pick up a password and
account name from the Net and get the extra functions too?
 
And said:
I find Eudora's UI just fine but as your mailboxes grow
then it seems to need more and more resources. Also I get
the feeling that the owner's of Eudora, Qualcomm, are not
really interested in keeping it up to date.

However, I REALLY do like its filtering capabilities and
its multiple accounts (which it calls "personalities" or
"personas").

If other emailers could do those two things as well as
Eudora then maybe I would go and use them instead.
Click to expand...

Frankly, I find Mozilla's filters to work just fine, the
multiple accounts work just as well. As for personas, I use
those in News, and Xnews does it better than Eudora.

Eudora has a confusing UI and error messages even more
worthless than Windows'.



--
:-) Christopher Jahn
:-(

http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html

'I was in jail somewhere else.'|No-Show Accused
 
Franky said:
I shouldn't really say this but why not just pick up a password and
account name from the Net and get the extra functions too?
Click to expand...

Why not rob a bank and go on a nice holiday...
 
Back
Top