Just wonderin' :-)

  • Thread starter Thread starter BoaterDave
  • Start date Start date
~BD~ said:
I'm wondering if the author is correct in what he claims. Some guidance
on this will be welcomed!

Which claim? I see a glaring reason why a remote session will not
work outside of the LAN.
 
This just in to the microsoft.public.test.here news room. On Mon, 09
Apr 2012 22:19:14 +0100 it was announced to all in a public briefing,
"Then I could do whatever I wanted.. copy files\folders from their hard
drive to mine or vice versa, move files\folders around, delete files,
rename files, etc.. *and they would never know*!"

You're really trying to disprove anything any everything I have said,
aren't you? You're just not willing to face the facts as I have
carefully demonstrated/laid out for you in clear, easy to understand
English.

If you are *that* determined to prove/disprove what I have said, why
don't you try it out locally yourself and find out just how simple it
is..

Then again you probably wouldn't be able to perform the task without
someone remoting into your computer and doing it for you.

I'd show you just how simple a procedure it is, complete with screen
caps, pretty instructions, a YouTube video, pop-up books, PowerPoint
presentations and a narrator but you STILL wouldn't get it. So it
would be a complete waste of my time.

So here..

And here..

Pay attention, VERY CAREFULLY.. I understand that will be a difficult
task for you.

Again, as I have said previously (and others have as well), you are on
a Macintosh computer NOT a PC. So all of the above information is
completely irrelevant to you.
 
You arrogant, pontificating a***hole - the guy could be using an internet
café, or anything, why do you assume stuff?!!...

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
 
A great many, I should think! Like the millions of XP machines that
populate internet cafés and have not, as yet, been upgraded...

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
 
Tim Meddick has brought this to us :
You arrogant, pontificating a***hole - the guy could be using an internet
café, or anything, why do you assume stuff?!!...

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)

Top posting idiot.
 
After serious thinking Tim Meddick wrote :
A great many, I should think! Like the millions of XP machines that populate
internet cafés and have not, as yet, been upgraded...

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)

Go play with your muslimer pals you top posting ****wit.
 
You arrogant, pontificating a***hole - the guy could be using an
internet café, or anything, why do you assume stuff?!!...

Er, Tim - BD is well known to regular posters. Sycho is neither
pontificating, nor assuming stuff.

HTH
 
Tim said:
You arrogant, pontificating a***hole - the guy could be using an
internet café, or anything, why do you assume stuff?!!...

Indeed, his questions on this matter relate to his previous XP setup and
although he is on a Mac now - he still has an XP machine to play with
the batfiles to his pleasure.

Unfortunately, whether or not something is possible *still* doesn't
answer the real question of was he or was he not attacked by his
perceived nemesis during the session with the private newsgroup.
 
This just in to the microsoft.public.test.here news room. On Tue, 10
Apr 2012 00:46:26 +0100 it was announced to all in a public briefing,
You arrogant, pontificating a***hole - the guy could be using an internet
café, or anything, why do you assume stuff?!!...

You moronic pile of cow shit, little do you realize that BD has been
asking this VERY same question and getting multiple answers not only
from myself but MANY others. Both here and in alt.2600.

Not to mention, I *know* for a fact that BD uses Macintrash because I
have his ****ing system tagged from NUMEROUS visits to my web site
which I host locally from my own box.

He is not satisfied with any answers he gets from me or anyone else
and is doing nothing but chasing ghosts and trolling news groups to
get his rocks off. He refuses not only to listen to ANY ****ing thing
said to him, but he refuses to read, comprehend ANYthing given to him
no matter HOW many times it's been explained ad nauseum.

So, therefore, kindly STFU, you ignorant, top-posting, whiny little
bitch.
 
You moronic pile of cow shit, little do you realize that BD has been
asking this VERY same question and getting multiple answers not only
from myself but MANY others. Both here and in alt.2600.

Not to mention, I *know* for a fact that BD uses Macintrash because I
have his ****ing system tagged from NUMEROUS visits to my web site which
I host locally from my own box.

He is not satisfied with any answers he gets from me or anyone else and
is doing nothing but chasing ghosts and trolling news groups to get his
rocks off. He refuses not only to listen to ANY ****ing thing said to
him, but he refuses to read, comprehend ANYthing given to him no matter
HOW many times it's been explained ad nauseum.

So, therefore, kindly STFU, you ignorant, top-posting, whiny little
bitch.

You pretty well have it covered there Sycho.
 
This just in to the microsoft.public.test.here news room. On 10 Apr
2012 03:27:14 GMT it was announced to all in a public briefing, Oldus
You pretty well have it covered there Sycho.

Thanks. I hope I didn't leave any other important information out of
this equation.

I still wonder (well..... not really) how the moron likes the taste of
his toe jam? Better yet, it might be in his best interest to leave the
foot right where it is. And if he gets bored, I'm sure if he bought
some anal lube, he might find room for his head in his ass after he
removes my foot from it. ;)
 
~BD~ explained on 10/19/2013 :
> G. Morgan wrote:


It seems that you /always/ take me seriously, Master Morgan! ;-)

As RonNNN has mentioned today, your drug taking will have dulled your psyche
for sure. Enjoy what little life you have left, in the best way that you
possibly can.

[deleted]
 
That's rather rude and uncalled for Eagle - IMO, anyway.

My ploy was to get G.Morgan to follow the link in the signature block of
Mr Kerry Brown. It no longer provides a route to the 'BBS forum' as it
used to:-

http://web.archive.org/web/20071205055227/http://www.vistahelp.ca/

I also note that *you* - one of Graham's closest on-line pals, have not
yet signed up on *his* new phpBB. Is that simply because you, like Jenn,
are simply too busy? If so, WILL you be registering as a 'member'?

Or do you think it just a trick to gain access to one's IP address?

Tell me Eagle, WHY does Graham choose to be unfriendly towards BD? Is
it, do you think, solely because of the drugs he takes - or is it
something else besides?

Ray thinks it is because you refer to yourself in the third person, but
Ray is often wrong.
 
After serious thinking ~BD~ wrote :
There's no ploy when you are honest and true, Graham! ;-)


So is your new BBS simply a trick to get *MY* IP address?

You did say a while back that you'd like to hack into my computer. I do
believe you need my IP address to do that. Is that correct?

Dave,
Trust Graham. He is one of the most honest people I've ever met on the
internet.
 
Back
Top