Just to let you know

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Yates
  • Start date Start date
Dave Hull said:
Why does ignorant, which we are all guilty of being in some areas, equate to
being foolish or stupid? You might know about computers, but does that
makes people who don't retarded in some sense? Jonathan, how is it that
people can be fools for not being born with the knowledge necessary to
understand computers and software?
Click to expand...

It doesn't, no, and they aren't.

Perhaps you missed the part where AJ claimed I was making "the biggest back
pedal in USENET history" in one of my follow up posts. I interpret that
as an attack on the correctness of the content of the posts. As I am
quite confident in the technical accuracy of my post, and AJ clearly doesn't
have the technical background to be challenging its accuracy, I, in fine
USENET tradition, flamed him. If he had asked a question in a civilized
manner, rather than attacking my post, I would have responded in kind.

-Jonathan (e-mail address removed)
 
Hey! I only posted it because I saw it in a hardware mag and thought it
would be worth sharing. And guess what - if you change the value in the
registry yet the system detects the value of the L2 cache anyway then there
is no harm done to anyone is there? Have you actually tested the setting? I
find a lot of you "people who seem to know what you are on about" take a
whooooooole lot on trust when it comes to what Microsoft would have you
beleive Don't forget, XP is the opertating system that they claimed never
needed to restart after an application install!! That was a laugh. But hey,
I think you are more than likely right about the L2 cache. But what does
that then tell you? It tells me that MS are doing nothing but rehashing th
same things over and over, hence all the defunct entries in the registry.

Daniel
Click to expand...

I agree. Thanks Daniel.

@drian.
 
Back
Top