Just to let you know

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Yates
  • Start date Start date
D

Daniel Yates

Hi all

Bought my fave hardware magazine the other day and discovered something
which I thought others might want to know about ( just in case ).

A lot of people these days are running processors with a fast L2 cache,
normally 512kb - Northwood or Bartons for example. Did you kow that if you
are running XP you will only be using 256Kb of this at the most as XP is
only configured to utilise that amount. If you are running a 512Kb L2 Cache
or higher you need to register it manually.

You can do this by going to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SessionManager\MemoryMan
agement and find the DWORD entry : SecondLevelDataCache. When entering
values here, be sure to use the correct numeric system. 256Kb should be
entered as 100 in hexadecimal, 512Kb is 200 and 1024Kb is 400

Hope this is of use to some of you guys and gals

Peace

Daniel
 
"Daniel Yates" shared:
Bought my fave hardware magazine the other day
and discovered something which I thought others
might want to know about ( just in case ).
Click to expand...


What's the magazine that carries this interesting
stuff?


*TimDaniels*
 
Daniel Yates said:
Hi all

Bought my fave hardware magazine the other day and discovered something
which I thought others might want to know about ( just in case ).

A lot of people these days are running processors with a fast L2 cache,
normally 512kb - Northwood or Bartons for example. Did you kow that if you
are running XP you will only be using 256Kb of this at the most as XP is
only configured to utilise that amount. If you are running a 512Kb L2 Cache
or higher you need to register it manually.

You can do this by going to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SessionManager\MemoryMan
agement and find the DWORD entry : SecondLevelDataCache. When entering
values here, be sure to use the correct numeric system. 256Kb should be
entered as 100 in hexadecimal, 512Kb is 200 and 1024Kb is 400

Hope this is of use to some of you guys and gals

Peace

Daniel
Click to expand...
Thanks for that

SteveH
 
It;s in the Uk and called PCGaming Hardware World. It is a relativly new mag
( only 5 issues out so far ) but this is the best hardware mag I have ever
seen. basically it may as well be called homebuilders and overclockers
monthly 'cause that is what it is

To quote it's front cover " Extreme Hardware! : The only mag dedicated to
games hardware and extreme CPU, 3DCard & motherboard tuning!"

.. very good mag, worth getting.

Daniel
 
Daniel Yates said:
It;s in the Uk and called PCGaming Hardware World. It is a relativly new mag
( only 5 issues out so far ) but this is the best hardware mag I have ever
seen. basically it may as well be called homebuilders and overclockers
monthly 'cause that is what it is

To quote it's front cover " Extreme Hardware! : The only mag dedicated to
games hardware and extreme CPU, 3DCard & motherboard tuning!"

. very good mag, worth getting.

Daniel
Click to expand...

Do you have an url for them?
 
Excellent tip. If I read the article correctly, this is probably set
incorrectly in every machine where the CPU was upgraded after XP was
installed (such as mine).
 
Great find! Thanks for the heads up. All my Barton boxes are running
Win98SE but I'm glad to know about that anyway.
 
They havent got a website yet. Not sure if they have one in the pipeline or
not. I know they are a sub mag of PC Gaming World who i know have a web
site but not sure of the URL - a google search should pop something up.

Daniel
Olav said:
Do you have an url for them?



----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption
Click to expand...
=---
 
Excellent tip. If I read the article correctly, this is probably set
incorrectly in every machine where the CPU was upgraded after XP was
installed (such as mine).
Click to expand...

Yeah, reports are rolling in of pee4's needing the same fix.
 
Daniel Yates said:
Hi all

Bought my fave hardware magazine the other day and discovered something
which I thought others might want to know about ( just in case ).

A lot of people these days are running processors with a fast L2 cache,
normally 512kb - Northwood or Bartons for example. Did you kow that if you
are running XP you will only be using 256Kb of this at the most as XP is
only configured to utilise that amount. If you are running a 512Kb L2 Cache
or higher you need to register it manually.

You can do this by going to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SessionManager\MemoryMan
agement and find the DWORD entry : SecondLevelDataCache. When entering
values here, be sure to use the correct numeric system. 256Kb should be
entered as 100 in hexadecimal, 512Kb is 200 and 1024Kb is 400

Hope this is of use to some of you guys and gals
Click to expand...

I did this, and altered the reg entry, but when i run the L2 verify script
it still shows the L2 cache as 0?

But when i look in the registry it is set to 200 and does say "512"??
 
Daniel Yates said:
Hi all

Bought my fave hardware magazine the other day and discovered something
which I thought others might want to know about ( just in case ).

A lot of people these days are running processors with a fast L2 cache,
normally 512kb - Northwood or Bartons for example. Did you kow that if you
are running XP you will only be using 256Kb of this at the most as XP is
only configured to utilise that amount. If you are running a 512Kb L2 Cache
or higher you need to register it manually.

You can do this by going to
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SessionManager\MemoryMan
agement and find the DWORD entry : SecondLevelDataCache. When entering
values here, be sure to use the correct numeric system. 256Kb should be
entered as 100 in hexadecimal, 512Kb is 200 and 1024Kb is 400

Hope this is of use to some of you guys and gals
Click to expand...

I'm running a Pentium 4 @ 2.53GHz with a default FSB of 533, thus i assume
this is a L2 cache of 512?

Yeah...google or Intel...just checking. :)
 
RamFan said:
Excellent tip. If I read the article correctly, this is probably set
incorrectly in every machine where the CPU was upgraded after XP was
installed (such as mine).
Click to expand...

Mine was a fresh install of Windows XP Professional, it was also set to
"0"...which is 256K L2, so i have followed the instructions.
Any more tips like this to tweak performance?

And how in the hell do you keep your view settings to stick???...every time
i go into My Documents my view settings change.

:(
 
Richard said:
I did this, and altered the reg entry, but when i run the L2 verify script
it still shows the L2 cache as 0?

But when i look in the registry it is set to 200 and does say "512"??
Click to expand...

Which chip?

--

Are you registered as a bone marrow donor? You regenerate what you
donate. You are offered the chance to donate only if you match a person
on the recipient list. Visit www.marrow.org or call your local Red Cross
and ask about registering to be a bone marrow donor.

spam trap: replace shyah_right! with hotmail when replying
 
I did this, and altered the reg entry, but when i run the L2 verify script
it still shows the L2 cache as 0?

But when i look in the registry it is set to 200 and does say "512"??
Click to expand...

I have the same problem, though I wonder if the L2 verifier isn't working
properly.
I am running a P4 2.4C.

Dave
 
I did this, and altered the reg entry, but when i run the L2 verify script
it still shows the L2 cache as 0?

But when i look in the registry it is set to 200 and does say "512"??
Click to expand...

Just an update, I am experiencing the same thing as you, but I checked my L2
cache using the DMI explorer in my Asus Probe utility and it says that I
have 512 installed. I tend to believe it too.

Dave
 
Just an update, I am experiencing the same thing as you, but I checked my L2
cache using the DMI explorer in my Asus Probe utility and it says that I
have 512 installed. I tend to believe it too.
Click to expand...
Dave
Click to expand...

Just one question. Probe reads that you have a CPU with 512Mb. Does
that mean XP knows it?
 
Back
Top