T
Tom Emmelot
Hi NoOp,
I did the same and the same dll came up!!!!!
Regards >*< TOM >*<
NoOp schreef:
I did the same and the same dll came up!!!!!
Regards >*< TOM >*<
NoOp schreef:
Tom Emmelot said:Hi Bill,
And when your time is up you should know of this is the reason that you
are in a dark place where you have to work without any MS programs!
Regards >*< TOM >*<
Bill Sanderson MVP schreef:
condemned to using CA on my ViIsta platforms for the near term.
Test the 2007 version at the moment, the Venus Spytrap is integrated now,
works great!
Regards >*< TOM >*<
Scott D said:If you would kindly extracted your narrow mind from your broad posterior
for
a few moments, you would realize that anti-threat detection (of all sorts)
is
not an exact science. EVERY SINGLE PRODUCT on the market misses a few
things
from time to time. Check Virus Total for this week's statistics.
Whereas I have been testing Prevx on a couple of systems for the past two
months, I am not extoling its virtues as the solution to the world's
problems. I like it because it provides real-time insight to applications
being run. (I genuinely enjoy the "noise". It lowers paranoia. Most
will
not like being "bothered".)
Sofar Prevx looks quite promising, but I still have ewido and
Defender/OneCare installed as co-resident threat scans on most of my
production systems. I also hold a-squared, NOD32, BitDefender, Kaspersky,
and others in high regard and have expereince with each in various
environments -- all good.
One vendor that has fallen from grace -- MY grace anyway -- is Symantec.
I
express my bias often and loudly on this matter.
My personal "solution" is that I would NEVER depend on a single
"solution".
I run multiple resident anti-threat tools and conduct daily on-line threat
scans using a number of different tools from the Internet Security page in
my
sig.
--
Scott D
Internet Security: http://SecorConsulting.net/pages/security.html
CIS Benchmark: http://SecorConsulting.net/pages/benchmark.html