Ink consumption, some figures

  • Thread starter Thread starter Digital Photography Now
  • Start date Start date
Digital said:
If anyone is interested in some actual, independent, measurements of photo
printer ink consumption, I've published some on the DPNow printer discussion
forum here:

http://dpnow.com/bb/printer.pl

Ian

Digital Photography Now
http://dpnow.com

Ouch! Those figures are brutal. In the old days we called it "highway
robbery." Fortunately, I refill with bulk ink and my costs are probably
too low to calculate. A wild guess would be a fraction of a penny per
page. Either way there is no point in calculating my exact costs.

Has the use of aftermarket inks cost me a new printhead or clogging?
Absolutely not. I did have a printhead fail after a month of use on my
i860. I replaced it and was still working 10 months later with the SAME
inks. Proof that it wasn't the inks that caused it. It was just a bum
Canon OEM Printhead.

-Taliesyn

-Taliesyn
 
I can't recommend ink refilling. While there could be some good third party
inks out there, it's too much of a risk to know which ones are OK and which
ones will fade in next to no time or even damage the print head in your
printer. The chemistry and physics that go in to ink jet ink formulations
are very complex. You can't just use coloured water.

Buying refilled HP and Lexmark cartridges is not a good bet in my experience
as you have no idea how many times they have been refilled before and the
print heads that are built in to these cartridges are not designed to last
for refilled use.

You said 'absolutely not' - but then revealed that your first print head
failed after a month?

Wilhelm Imaging fade tests showed that all the third party inks they tested
failed to last anywhere near as long as manufacturer inks.

It's much more sensible to save by using third party papers.

Ian

Digital Photography Now
http://dpnow.com
 
Digital said:
I can't recommend ink refilling.
AGREED

While there could be some good third party
inks out there, it's too much of a risk to know which ones are OK and which
ones will fade in next to no time or even damage the print head in your
printer.
THAT IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING. THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO SHOULD TAKE A RISK
ARE VERY HIGH VOLUME USERS AND HOPE THEY GET THEIR VOLUME BEFORE THE
PRINTER GETS RUINED. THEN THEY WON.
The chemistry and physics that go in to ink jet ink formulations
are very complex. You can't just use coloured water.
AND THE AFTERMARKET INK VENDORS DO NOT DISCLOSE WHAT YOU ARE GETTING AND
IT IS VERY POSSIBLE THAT EACH PURCHASE CAN BE DIFFERENT STUFF WITH THE
SAME LABEL.
Buying refilled HP and Lexmark cartridges is not a good bet in my experience
as you have no idea how many times they have been refilled before and the
print heads that are built in to these cartridges are not designed to last
for refilled use.
THAT IS CORRECT
You said 'absolutely not' - but then revealed that your first print head
failed after a month?
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM CHURCH MEMBERS. NOW DO NOT LET THEM THREATEN
YOU WID DA KILLFILE.
Wilhelm Imaging fade tests showed that all the third party inks they tested
failed to last anywhere near as long as manufacturer inks.
NOW YOU ARE COOKEN. I BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU SAY. IT IS THE TRUTH.
BOY THEY CERTAINLY WON'T LIKE THIS. KEEP THIS UP AND THEY WILL CALL YOU
A TROLL
 
Digital said:
I can't recommend ink refilling. While there could be some good third party
inks out there, it's too much of a risk to know which ones are OK and which
ones will fade in next to no time or even damage the print head in your
printer. The chemistry and physics that go in to ink jet ink formulations
are very complex. You can't just use coloured water.

Ian, I hate to knock you, I love dpnow.com, but I don't use Easter Egg
coloring dye, as you're implying. And I don't think anyone else here
does. This last statement of yours sounds more like a statement that
would come from Measekite, our resident troll with zero experience.

I've actually been using "real" 3rd party inks for many years. Nothing I
have printed has suspiciously lost or changed colors. And I don't
anticipate they will any time soon.
You said 'absolutely not' - but then revealed that your first print head
failed after a month?

Bloody right, Ian! Proof of 'absolutely not' because the second
printhead prints like new, 10 months later, WITH the same inks, whereas
the first croaked in no time and was obviously a Canon dud (these things
do happen, you know). I've seen quite a few cases of early printhead
failure. I operate 3 Canon printers on either refill or compatibles
(formulabs ink). Neither fading or clogging has ever been an issue. I
have some very high quality projects from over 5 years ago (I don't sell
anything). They look every bit like they did when I printed them and
exhibit no discoloration/fading. So I know they'll be around when I'm
too old to even care about this question.
Wilhelm Imaging fade tests showed that all the third party inks they tested
failed to last anywhere near as long as manufacturer inks.

Not anywhere near as long? Well, my own tests so far have shown that my
MONEY has disappeared over 10 TIMES FASTER when using manufacturer inks.
While at the same time I have NOT seen any difference in fading or
clogging between manufacturer and compatible inks.
It's much more sensible to save by using third party papers.

Agree with the papers idea but disagree most vociferously (is that a
word?) for inks. I would literally bankrupt myself using manufacturer
inks. No lie. With my current arrangement I can operate 3 Canon printers
and have more ink than I know what to do with (I may have to color some
Easter Eggs after all just to use it up ;-). Hard to argue with success.

-Taliesyn (your average inkjet user)
 
Digital said:
I can't recommend ink refilling. While there could be some good third party
inks out there, it's too much of a risk to know which ones are OK and which
ones will fade in next to no time or even damage the print head in your
printer. The chemistry and physics that go in to ink jet ink formulations
are very complex. You can't just use coloured water.

Buying refilled HP and Lexmark cartridges is not a good bet in my experience
as you have no idea how many times they have been refilled before and the
print heads that are built in to these cartridges are not designed to last
for refilled use.

You said 'absolutely not' - but then revealed that your first print head
failed after a month?

Wilhelm Imaging fade tests showed that all the third party inks they tested
failed to last anywhere near as long as manufacturer inks.

It's much more sensible to save by using third party papers.

Ian

Digital Photography Now
http://dpnow.com
Bullshit! Simply not true.
Frank
 
As I originally said, I don't rule out the possibility of there being
reputable inks out there and, from what you say, you use just such an ink.

But even you cannot deny that there is a lot of bad ink out there. There is
hardly any independent testing of third party inks, so it is a minefield for
buyers.

I have bought third party cartridges in the past and regretted the results
every time.

One third party ink for an Epson pigment ink printer that Wilhelm tested
actually contained a poor quality dye-based ink and had a fade resistance
rating of less than a year instead of Epson's own ink rated at over 100
years.

Having visited HP, Canon, Lexmark and Epson ink cartridge manufacturing
plants and met many of the scientists and engineers behind the products,
plus absorbing many technical presentations on the complex nature and
requirements of inks for ink-jet printers, it's clear to me that choosing to
use third party inks is very often a false economy, sometimes a threat to
the proper working of your printer and, at best, too much of a risk to
bother with.

By all means using third party inks if you wish - it's a free world. But do
so with your eyes open.

Ian

Digital Photography Now
http://dpnow.com
 
Digital said:
Frank - can you be specific? which bit wasn't true in your opinion?

Ian

Digital Photography Now
http://dpnow.com
Your entire statement is filled with untrue assumptions and
misrepresented facts. I've used 3rd party inks in my
marketing/advertising business for ten + yrs now. I've used them in
hp's, epson's and canon printers with now problems of fading or print
head damage.
It's simply naive to think that only large corp can make good quality
ink. If that were true, after market ink manufacturers and suppliers
would not exist.
Sorry to rattle your cage but many, many printers and photographers
successfully use after market inks.
Frank
 
I repeat - sure there can be good inks out there, but how will know, with
confidence that what you are buying is any good?

Do you deny that there are plenty of bad inks out there?

It's not like buying gasoline for your car. The specifications for gasoline
are strictly defined and the product is carefully monitored during the
manufacturing process.

The technical requirements for inks are much more complex; viscosity, the
ability to survive transient super-heated temperatures, the ability to
resist mixing with different coloured inks, the ability to resist oxidation
and light energy, colour accuracy, stability while in storage, the design of
the cartridge itself where third parties manufacture their own - did you
know that the latest Epson cartridges have a complex internal desgn that
maintains the liquid pressure inside the cartridge throughout its duty
cycle, for example?

Blanket rejection of my many points looks rather like being in denial today.
I'm not saying that your experience with third party inks is untrue, I'm
only saying that your isolated experience is not a guarantee of trouble-free
third party ink usage elsewhere.

And I'm not speaking theoretically either - I have personally bought and
attempted to use several third party cartridges for different printers and
all caused varying degrees of problems.

Ian

Digital Photography Now
http://dpnow.com
 
Digital said:
I repeat - sure there can be good inks out there, but how will know, with
confidence that what you are buying is any good?

Do you deny that there are plenty of bad inks out there?

It's not like buying gasoline for your car. The specifications for gasoline
are strictly defined and the product is carefully monitored during the
manufacturing process.

The technical requirements for inks are much more complex; viscosity, the
ability to survive transient super-heated temperatures, the ability to
resist mixing with different coloured inks, the ability to resist oxidation
and light energy, colour accuracy, stability while in storage, the design of
the cartridge itself where third parties manufacture their own - did you
know that the latest Epson cartridges have a complex internal desgn that
maintains the liquid pressure inside the cartridge throughout its duty
cycle, for example?

Blanket rejection of my many points looks rather like being in denial today.
I'm not saying that your experience with third party inks is untrue, I'm
only saying that your isolated experience is not a guarantee of trouble-free
third party ink usage elsewhere.

And I'm not speaking theoretically either - I have personally bought and
attempted to use several third party cartridges for different printers and
all caused varying degrees of problems.

Ian

Digital Photography Now
http://dpnow.com
You're preaching to the wrong crowd about after market inks. You need
to preach to the choir...aka meashershithead. May the two of you forever
be happy with oem overpriced easily duplicated inks.
Frank
 
Digital said:
I repeat - sure there can be good inks out there, but how will know, with
confidence that what you are buying is any good?
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE
Do you deny that there are plenty of bad inks out there?
THE CHURCH MEMBERS DO
It's not like buying gasoline for your car. The specifications for gasoline
are strictly defined and the product is carefully monitored during the
manufacturing process.
YOU ARE PREACHING TO THE CHOIR
The technical requirements for inks are much more complex; viscosity, the
ability to survive transient super-heated temperatures, the ability to
resist mixing with different coloured inks, the ability to resist oxidation
and light energy, colour accuracy, stability while in storage, the design of
the cartridge itself where third parties manufacture their own - did you
know that the latest Epson cartridges have a complex internal desgn that
maintains the liquid pressure inside the cartridge throughout its duty
cycle, for example?
THEY WILL NOT LISTEN TO YOUR GOOD ADVICE
Blanket rejection of my many points looks rather like being in denial today.
THEY ALL LIKE TO LIE. THEY WILL TELL YOU THEY NEVER HAD A CLOG BUT
LATER YOU FIND OUT THEY BOUGHT A PRINTHEAD. THEY WILL TELL YOU HOW
BEAUTIFUL RESULTS THE GET AND THEN THEY HAVE A FADING PROBLEM.

KEEP UP THE GOOD POSTINGS. AND DO NOT LET THE CHURCHIES DRIVE YOU
AWAY. THEY WILL TRY.
I'm not saying that your experience with third party inks is untrue, I'm
only saying that your isolated experience is not a guarantee of trouble-free
third party ink usage elsewhere.
RIGHT ON
And I'm not speaking theoretically either - I have personally bought and
attempted to use several third party cartridges for different printers and
all caused varying degrees of problems.
THAT IS CORRECT
 
Digital said:
Frank - can you be specific? which bit wasn't true in your opinion?

Ian
HE IS DEACON OF DA CHURCH OF THE LATTER DAY INKIE STINKIES. DO NOT
LISTEN TO ANYTHING HE SAYS. KILLFILE HIM. HE IS UNREASONABLE.
 
Digital said:
As I originally said, I don't rule out the possibility of there being
reputable inks out there and, from what you say, you use just such an ink.
I EVEN DOUBT THAT
But even you cannot deny that there is a lot of bad ink out there. There is
hardly any independent testing of third party inks, so it is a minefield for
buyers.
SINCE YOU DO NOT KNOW WHO MAKES WHAT AND ALL OF THE INKS ARE STORE
LABELS THERE CANNOT BE ANY INDEPENDENT TESTING AND YOU CANNOT TRACK
BRANDS BECAUSE THERE ARE NO BRANDS.
I have bought third party cartridges in the past and regretted the results
every time.

AMEN

One third party ink for an Epson pigment ink printer that Wilhelm tested
actually contained a poor quality dye-based ink and had a fade resistance
rating of less than a year instead of Epson's own ink rated at over 100
years.
OH MY YOU ARE COMMITING HERESEY.

THEY ARE GOING TO WANT TO BURN YOU AT THE STEAK
Having visited HP, Canon, Lexmark and Epson ink cartridge manufacturing
plants and met many of the scientists and engineers behind the products,
plus absorbing many technical presentations on the complex nature and
requirements of inks for ink-jet printers, it's clear to me that choosing to
use third party inks is very often a false economy,
BLASPHEMY THEY WILL SAY. YOU REALLY GOT THEM INTO A SWEAT AND A TIZZY NOW
sometimes a threat to
the proper working of your printer and, at best, too much of a risk to
bother with.
HOW DID YOU GET SO KNOWEDGEABLE
By all means using third party inks if you wish - it's a free world. But do
so with your eyes open.
THERE EYES ARE OPEN BUT NOT THEIR BRAINS.

YOU CANNOT ARGUE WITH A HIGH SCHOOL KID. HE HAS TO GROW UP FIRST.
 
Taliesyn said:
Ian, I hate to knock you,

THEN DON'T/
I love dpnow.com, but I don't use Easter Egg
coloring dye, as you're implying.

HA HA
And I don't think anyone else here
does.

THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY USE
This last statement of yours sounds more like a statement that
would come from Measekite, our resident troll with zero experience.

YOU ARE THE TROLL
I've actually been using "real" 3rd party inks for many years. Nothing I
have printed has suspiciously lost or changed colors. And I don't
anticipate they will any time soon.

ARE YOU COLOR BLIND
CAUGHT IN THE ACT
Bloody right, Ian! Proof of 'absolutely not' because the second
printhead prints like new, 10 months later, WITH the same inks, whereas

HE IS A VERY VERY VERY HIGH PRINTUSER. FOR HIM AND BECAUSE HE IS A
STARVING STUDENT HE HAS NO OTHER CHOICE AND FOR HIM THE RISK IS REASONABLE
the first croaked in no time and was obviously a Canon dud (these things
do happen, you know). I've seen quite a few cases of early printhead
failure. I operate 3 Canon printers on either refill or compatibles
(formulabs ink)

HE THINKS
. Neither fading or clogging has ever been an issue. I
have some very high quality projects from over 5 years ago (I don't sell
anything).

BUT HIS MAGENTA WAS NOT COOL
They look every bit like they did when I printed them and
exhibit no discoloration/fading. So I know they'll be around when I'm
too old to even care about this question.


Not anywhere near as long? Well, my own tests so far have shown that my
MONEY has disappeared over 10 TIMES FASTER when using manufacturer inks.
While at the same time I have NOT seen any difference in fading or
clogging between manufacturer and compatible inks.


Agree with the papers idea but disagree most vociferously (is that a
word?) for inks. I would literally bankrupt myself using manufacturer
inks. No lie. With my current arrangement I can operate 3 Canon printers
and have more ink than I know what to do with (I may have to color some
Easter Eggs after all just to use it up ;-). Hard to argue with success.

-Taliesyn (your average inkjet user)

THAT IS A LIE. HE IS A VERY HEAVY USER. THE AVERAGE USER DOES NOT USE
3 PRINTERS. WHAT A JOKE.
 
Digital said:
As I originally said, I don't rule out the possibility of there being
reputable inks out there and, from what you say, you use just such an ink.

But even you cannot deny that there is a lot of bad ink out there. There is
hardly any independent testing of third party inks, so it is a minefield for
buyers.

I can only say with confidence that the only poor, not-recommended ink
out there is "universal" or "works in all printers" type ink, which I
don't use. I've used several inks formulated for my printers and have
not come across anything I would remotely consider as "bad ink".

Don't forget you're a digital professional, you MUST have the "very
best" (I say that with a grain of salt), and you can afford manufacturer
inks. But most of us in this newsgroup are not professionals and we
don't require the most expensive ink. Everything I print is for myself,
with the exception of greeting cards and some special projects I give
away to friends. I have no need for your precise requirements nor 100
year lasting printouts. That's overkill in my view. My only requirement
is that it look as good as OEM ink, doesn't damage the printer, cost
about 1/10th, and show no noticeable fading within a few years. All of
these requirements have been filled. The money I save using compatibles
and bulk ink allows me the luxury of 3 printers (a set of ink costs the
same as a printer!). If I had to use manufacturer inks exclusively I
would literally have to go back to using a typewriter. And all I can say
to that is..... Arrrrrrggggghhhhhh ;-)
Having visited HP, Canon, Lexmark and Epson ink cartridge manufacturing
plants and met many of the scientists and engineers behind the products,
plus absorbing many technical presentations on the complex nature and
requirements of inks for ink-jet printers, it's clear to me that choosing to
use third party inks is very often a false economy, sometimes a threat to
the proper working of your printer and, at best, too much of a risk to
bother with.

Anything but false economy! I recently bought an IP4000. It was selling
for $125 CAD (with taxes) and it came with a set of cartridges. The same
store was selling JUST the cartridges for $125 (with taxes)! Huh!!!!

Why would anyone worry about a printer that costs $100 when using good
bulk or compatibles saves you over $300 over 3 sets of Canon ink cartridges?
By all means using third party inks if you wish - it's a free world. But do
so with your eyes open.

Third party ink is in my blood . . .

-Taliesyn
 
As I originally said, I don't rule out the possibility of there being
reputable inks out there and, from what you say, you use just such an ink.

But even you cannot deny that there is a lot of bad ink out there. There is
hardly any independent testing of third party inks, so it is a minefield for
buyers.

Definitely are a lot of really cr*p operators out there and many exist
in the form of cheap copies from China, etc...

HOWEVER, you're presupposing that everyone blindly ignores the
resource of the net and their brains to do a little searching for
reliable reviews (eg: this newsgroup, various long established web
sites) and realise quickly which of the ink suppliers are good..

I suspect you could name MIS associates as one that is often quoted as
being very reliable for example.


I have bought third party cartridges in the past and regretted the results
every time.

Erm... now it's starting to sound like you're basing it purely on your
experience and not opening your ears/eyes to the others out there.

I can heartily admit that plenty of people get caught out with refills
but again if you just go with the "cheapest" you're going to get
burned.. Taking the time to research, review and then buy is always
much better..


As with others, sorry to be so blunt but you're mirroring the resident
trolls usual rubbish with little apparent time spent checking it
out... You'd be surprised just how successful a number of 3rd party
ink users have been...

Each to their own... but your opinion is just one side to the coin..
:)
 
Digital said:
As I originally said, I don't rule out the possibility of there being
reputable inks out there and, from what you say, you use just such an ink.

But even you cannot deny that there is a lot of bad ink out there. There is
hardly any independent testing of third party inks, so it is a minefield for
buyers.

I have used compatible inks for almost two years with no problems. I
have saved enough money to buy several printers. There are plenty of
reputable ink suppliers if one chooses to do a little research on the
web to find them. I think most people that have problems are using the
all-in-one inks kits instead of the model specific inks. If there are
so many bad ink suppliers then give us a list of them so we can avoid
them. I bet you can't name many or maybe none at all.
I have bought third party cartridges in the past and regretted the results
every time.

Who did you buy them from?
One third party ink for an Epson pigment ink printer that Wilhelm tested
actually contained a poor quality dye-based ink and had a fade resistance
rating of less than a year instead of Epson's own ink rated at over 100
years.

I fail to see where fading is an issue unless the prints are being sold.
I haven't noticed any fade problems with the Canon compatible inks I
use and if I did it is would be very easy and inexpensive to just print
another photo.
Having visited HP, Canon, Lexmark and Epson ink cartridge manufacturing
plants and met many of the scientists and engineers behind the products,
plus absorbing many technical presentations on the complex nature and
requirements of inks for ink-jet printers, it's clear to me that choosing to
use third party inks is very often a false economy, sometimes a threat to
the proper working of your printer and, at best, too much of a risk to
bother with.

Do you think the printer companies manufacture their own inks? Third
party inks are very seldom a false economy. Who can justify paying the
same amount for replacement ink cartridges as for a new printer? Where
is the economy in this model? Also, take a look at the Canon ink
cartridges. They are far from being a technological wonder.
By all means using third party inks if you wish - it's a free world. But do
so with your eyes open.

My eyes were opened wide the first time I priced OEM replacement
cartridges. ;)
 
Digital Photography Now said:
I repeat - sure there can be good inks out there, but how will know, with
confidence that what you are buying is any good?

Do you deny that there are plenty of bad inks out there?

It's not like buying gasoline for your car. The specifications for
gasoline are strictly defined and the product is carefully monitored
during the manufacturing process.

The technical requirements for inks are much more complex; viscosity, the
ability to survive transient super-heated temperatures, the ability to
resist mixing with different coloured inks, the ability to resist
oxidation and light energy, colour accuracy, stability while in storage,
the design of the cartridge itself where third parties manufacture their
own - did you know that the latest Epson cartridges have a complex
internal desgn that maintains the liquid pressure inside the cartridge
throughout its duty cycle, for example?

Blanket rejection of my many points looks rather like being in denial
today. I'm not saying that your experience with third party inks is
untrue, I'm only saying that your isolated experience is not a guarantee
of trouble-free third party ink usage elsewhere.

And I'm not speaking theoretically either - I have personally bought and
attempted to use several third party cartridges for different printers and
all caused varying degrees of problems.

Ian

Digital Photography Now
http://dpnow.com

Ian, I'm a fan of your site and am glad to see you participate on this
newsgroup.But before you get the undeserved reputation of being a Measekite
clone, please be aware that this newsgroup has been nearly destroyed by
Measekites hysterical ranting and falsehoods about all third party inks. He
makes no differentiation between cheap imported Chinese cartridges with ink
of unknown origin and refilling with quality third party bulk ink from
respected manufacturers such as Formulabs and Image-Specialists. Look at
their web sites and I'm sure you'll agree that these companies are not mom
and pop food coloring operators. You talk about using several third party
cartridges, but you don't mention if you have attempted refilling in lieu of
using aftermarket cartridges. That makes a huge difference in results - as
does the type of cartridge. There are many inferior products on the market
and ink cartridges are only one of millions. Refilling with quality bulk ink
from a supplier such as Formulabs or Image-Specialists solves the problem of
using ink of unknown lineage. I'm aware that you are UK based and these inks
may not be as readily available over there as in the US, but I urge you to
investigate these brands before making blanket statements about third party
vs. OEM labeled inks. Please take a look at the following thread which I
started on the Nifty-Stuff forum
http://www.nifty-stuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=3914#p3914 It discusses
who makes the bulk ink sold in the US for Canon printers. For a professional
photographer selling prints the situation is far different from those of us
with consumer grade printers for personal use. In addition, as a customer of
professional photographers I don't want the prints I purchase to be printed
on ANY inkjet printer. Proofs are OK, but not the final portrait. If that is
the case, they may as well give me a CD and let me print my own copies. I
also don't want the prints they sell me to be from an inferior lab using
poor chemicals and papers. OTOH, the pictures I take using my Olympus C-765
(wish I had an Evolt) are not intended to be professional quality but rather
as items for immediate or short term usage. If they fade down the road
(which none of mine have going back to the late 1990's) and I need reprints,
I can always reprint from a backup copy on DVD.
 
Back
Top