I'm still here. (O.T.)

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Corliss
  • Start date Start date
John Corliss said:
You had better hope that I never find out who you are. And I'm working
on that.

'Nuff said.

And what then, you stupid clown? Your threats are even more empty than
your head.

You've known who Andy Mabbett is for at least 5 years. You even had
his address when you visited England on vacation a few years back.
You've made similar threats to him on numerous occasions and the net
result has been what? Sweet F.A., LOL!

He's still here needling you 24/7, and you still swallow the bait
every time like the immature pea-brained little twerp that you are.

The truth is that you're such an incredibly inept oaf you can't even
work out what sock-puppets I use, never mind who *I* am - you
consistently get it wrong, even when I provide the most obvious clues
to help you out.

However, I make no special attempts to conceal my identity. I don't
use remailers or nyms. Even a clown like you should be able to figure
it out with a little help from the neighbour's 6-year old boy.

But don't expect to like what you find. I'm not a flabby wimp like
Mabbett and you'll discover the truth of what presently seems
impossible: That for all the incredibly dumb mistakes you've made in
the past, there are much, much dumber mistakes that you have yet to
make.

'Nuff said. ;-)

Mavis Chillum
 
The voice of "Andy Mabbett" drifted in on the cyber-winds,
from the sea of virtual chaos...
Is this a roll call? I'm still here.

Anyone else?


I'm not here, I just a figment of everyone's under active imagination.

But even a figment can have a life...
Which is more then I can say of some trolls. };8)
 
John said:
Paul Blarmy wrote:
One is an adverb, the other a noun.

If your first reference is to "****", it's a verb ("**** you") and a
noun ("that was a great ****", and an interjection ("****!") but I'm
not aware of an adverbial sense. Even if there is, that doesn't mean
it's *only* an adverb, as I've just shown.
 
If your first reference is to "****", it's a verb ("**** you") and
a noun ("that was a great ****", and an interjection ("****!")
but I'm not aware of an adverbial sense. Even if there is, that
doesn't mean it's *only* an adverb, as I've just shown.

He's ****ing correct. His usage of it was to modify the verb
'breaks,' so he used it as an adverb.
 
»Q« said:
He's ****ing correct. His usage of it was to modify the verb
'breaks,' so he used it as an adverb.

That's "****ing", not "****". He didn't say "that just **** breaks my
heart". And even if he'd said "that just...****...breaks my heart, it
would be an interjection if used to punctuate a pause, like that.

NOTE: Granted, I didn't read that far back, to see that he was actually
taking about "****ing" used in that manner (which *is* adverbial). But
I'll stick with my technicality, anyway. :)
 
That's "****ing", not "****". He didn't say "that just ****
breaks my heart". And even if he'd said "that
just...****...breaks my heart, it would be an interjection if used
to punctuate a pause, like that.

NOTE: Granted, I didn't read that far back, to see that he was
actually taking about "****ing" used in that manner (which *is*
adverbial). But I'll stick with my technicality, anyway. :)

Ok, since you opened with 'If your first reference is to "****"',
making the following discussion conditional on that, and since his
reference was indeed not to "****" but rather to "****ing" I will
let you go on the technicality. But just this effing once,
understood? ;)
 
»Q« said:
Ok, since you opened with 'If your first reference is to "****"',
making the following discussion conditional on that, and since his
reference was indeed not to "****" but rather to "****ing" I will
let you go on the technicality. But just this effing once,
understood? ;)

****yeah. :)
 
please don't feed the corliss troll.

**
|3iff "flonk" //ulins
CEO Indignitas - Formerly Alcatroll Labs Inc. (A Subsidiary of SNUH)
flOnk aT vERizOn DoT nEt

" "
-Marcel Marceau
 
Back
Top