R
robinb
that is exactly what it does as you see by my reply to Bill
robin
robin
Dave M said:....but apparently the sky has truly fallen in for our friend OldRebel (aka
Paul B):
Dave M said:Oh, this is real cute item for all the new IE7 installs. How did I miss
this before now? I'm sure everyone else must have seen it, right?
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=917964
....and then all the not-so-advanced users need to read the follow on linked
KB:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307654/
Bitman said:How much these will impact you probably relates most to how
much you've used other browsers, since it does create visual change.
It's always best to make only one major change at a time
so any problems can be detected as belonging to the correct application. A
week or two is usually sufficient to find these however.
the GUI
I'm tired of managing my security packages, I just want to use my next PC and
enjoy what it can do for me.
Thanks Dave - and Ye Gods! Well, I say again: no way am I getting involved
in any of this.
Alan said:Well, my sympathies to Paul. But just read this part of his post:
"What really disturbs me is that you cannot repair Windows using the
SP2 CD if IE7
is installed. This is a PITY, especially since uninstalling IE7
leaves IE6 messed up. I haven't found any solution that works other
than complete reformat of Windows. "
Is this true? You can no longer repair Windows with the CD? You
can't
get back to IE6 if there's a problem with IE7? If that's true, then
why on earth would anyone in their right mind risk installing such a
piece of software? Who needs malware when you can have this?
Bargepole job. No way am I touching this.
PITA = Pain In The Assis installed. This is a PITA (not PITY), especially since
uninstalling IE7
plun said:Well, I believe the probability is much lower for disc
crasch then
a messed up PC because of IE7.
Every user MUST have backups for personal files. It´s even
more important today
because of all malware.
But... "the AOL mess" is also involved in this and thats
maybe the biggest challenge...
kes said:What Paul said was
PITA = Pain In The Ass
Dave M said:GUI - Graphical User Interface
robinb said:actually i do not think you will regret IE7.
robinb said:eventually ie6 will
be phased out.
you might not have a choice not to install ie7
Actually, Paul is posting in several places trying to figure this out. InAlan D said:Well, out of the relatively small number of people posting here, it's
already happened to Paul. That tells me all I need to know about the
probabilities.
Understood, but backups are really far more valuable than all of the repairI do make backups. But that doesn't mean I want to be pushed into a position
where I have to use them.
I don't think AOL is an issue here, since this was based on Paul's possiblyWell, here again - I've been using AOL happily enough for ages. It doesn't
make sense to me, to change something that has worked perfectly well for
years merely to decrease the chances of IE7 messing up my system, when I
don't want IE7 in the first place. I'm simply not interested in messing about
with browsers. If someone is a writer, that doesn't mean he wants to keep
fiddling about with his pen.
The danger here - I can already feel it happening - is that more and more of
my time will get swallowed up in trying to change more and more aspects of my
system to improve its security, until I end up doing nothing else. That's
madness.
I'd also recommend that you look at complete maneged suites of protection
like WLOC and others, since you would really benefit from protection that
keeps itself up to date and simply notifies you when it needs attention, this
is who it was designed for.