Hiding menus from Google

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charley Kyd
  • Start date Start date
C

Charley Kyd

I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx

However, when Google returned information about a page, their descriptions
of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which provided no useful
information in the search results. Can anyone tell me what Microsoft does to
force the Google spider to reach deep into the html to return actual
content, rather than menu text?

Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?

Thanks.

Charley
 
Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
--
===
Tom [Pepper] Willett
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
---
FrontPage Support:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/

About FrontPage 2003:
http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
===
"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| No. I don't use frames.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > They don't use frames. Are you?
| >
| > --
| > Murray
| > ============
| >
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | >>
| >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| >>
| >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone tell
me
| >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into the
| >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| >>
| >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| >>
| >> Thanks.
| >>
| >> Charley
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.

Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu below
the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can see
that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.

So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore menu
text when they summarize each page.

Charley
 
Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content the SE will still use them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message |
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts
how-to articles, tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get work done
using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60"
BORDER="0" SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033"
ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the menu
item isn't returned with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing the
Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's clip
....

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office
Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from line
129, which is 32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for your
job</SPAN></TD>
....
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't
get crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
....
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
....
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px;
padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN
CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" -- not
"downloads" as I asked for. The last section of the description begins on
line 129, character 31,085. To get to that point, Google had to skip over
the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in line 118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page
descriptions? Or is Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore the
menu items?

Charley



Stefan B Rusynko said:
Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content the
SE will still use them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu
below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can
see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore
menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone
tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into
the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
Very interesting analysis.
Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page
descriptions? Or is Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore
the menu items?

I'll bet it's the former. Google is pretty smart....
 
Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid placement which the content for
the index is provide directly by the website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips,
columns, and quizzes that help you get work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5" TITLE="Crabby
Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"
SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033" ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the menu item isn't returned
with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from line 129, which is 32,000
characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't get
crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View this:
Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 4px;
padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" -- not "downloads" as I asked
for. The last section of the description begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to that
point, Google had to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in line 118,
character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page descriptions? Or is Microsoft
doing something to cause Google to ignore the menu items?

Charley



Stefan B Rusynko said:
Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content the SE will still use them
instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's happening
here.

Charley


Thomas A. Rowe said:
Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid
placement which the content for the index is provide directly by the
website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns,
and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center
hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get work
done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60"
BORDER="0" SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033"
ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the
menu item isn't returned with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing the
Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's
clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office
Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from
line 129, which is 32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for
your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't
get crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px;
padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN
CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" --
not "downloads" as I asked for. The last section of the description
begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to that point, Google had to
skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in line 118,
character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page
descriptions? Or is Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore
the menu items?

Charley



Stefan B Rusynko said:
Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content
the SE will still use them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu
below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You
can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text
size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all
of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore
menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu
text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can
anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep
into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that was a paid placement vs.
standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's happening here.

Charley


Thomas A. Rowe said:
Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid placement which the content for
the index is provide directly by the website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles,
tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"
SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033" ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the menu item isn't returned
with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from line 129, which is 32,000
characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't get
crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View this:
Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 4px;
padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" -- not "downloads" as I
asked for. The last section of the description begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to
that point, Google had to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in line 118,
character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page descriptions? Or is
Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content the SE will still use
them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:
http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
Thomas,

Does your statement apply specifically to Google? This is the first time
I've heard that. Can you point me to any documentation for that conclusion?

In any case, I doubt that Microsoft is paying Google--a competitor--to
return particular text about one obscure page at Microsoft.com. That would
imply that Microsoft maintains a huge department that does nothing but write
Google search results for Microsoft's 4,000,000+ web pages. Besides, if
Microsoft were doing something of the sort, it would be much easier if
Google merely agreed to display Microsoft's Description meta tag listing in
all circumstances.

Instead, it's much more likely that Google has some very smart people who
finally have learned how to return key information from a page while
ignoring menus.

Charley


Thomas A. Rowe said:
You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that was a
paid placement vs. standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's
happening here.

Charley


Thomas A. Rowe said:
Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid
placement which the content for the index is provide directly by the
website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips,
columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center
hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get
work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60"
BORDER="0" SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033"
ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the
menu item isn't returned with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing
the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's
clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office
Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from
line 129, which is 32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for
your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't
get crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px;
padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN
CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" --
not "downloads" as I asked for. The last section of the description
begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to that point, Google had
to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in line
118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page
descriptions? Or is Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore
the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content
the SE will still use them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:

http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu
below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You
can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text
size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through
all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore
menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu
text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can
anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep
into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
Yes you can. Google places the paid placments above and to the right of
natural listings, Overture places them above natural listings. In both cases
they're clearly labelled as sponsored results. You absolutely cannot pay
money to get a higher ranking.

--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

Thomas A. Rowe said:
You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that was a
paid placement vs. standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's
happening here.

Charley


Thomas A. Rowe said:
Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid
placement which the content for the index is provide directly by the
website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips,
columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center
hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get
work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60"
BORDER="0" SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033"
ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the
menu item isn't returned with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing
the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's
clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office
Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from
line 129, which is 32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for
your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't
get crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px;
padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN
CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" --
not "downloads" as I asked for. The last section of the description
begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to that point, Google had
to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in line
118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page
descriptions? Or is Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore
the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content
the SE will still use them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:

http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu
below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You
can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text
size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through
all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore
menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu
text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can
anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep
into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
I am not talking about paid/sponsored listing results, but paid inclusions.

Example: Take a large database driven site, there is no way that a search engine spider is going to
index the entire site, so the site would provide the search engines with a flat file of the content
to be included in the index in whatever format the search engine requires for a fee

Currently Google offers a service called Froggle for indexing eCommerce sites.

http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167941

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Jon Spivey said:
Yes you can. Google places the paid placments above and to the right of natural listings, Overture
places them above natural listings. In both cases they're clearly labelled as sponsored results.
You absolutely cannot pay money to get a higher ranking.

--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

Thomas A. Rowe said:
You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that was a paid placement vs.
standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's happening here.

Charley



Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid placement which the content
for the index is provide directly by the website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles,
tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"
SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033" ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the menu item isn't returned
with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from line 129, which is
32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't get
crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 4px;
padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's
clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" -- not "downloads" as I
asked for. The last section of the description begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to
that point, Google had to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in line
118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page descriptions? Or is
Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content the SE will still use
them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:

http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
See my reply to Jon's post.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Thomas,

Does your statement apply specifically to Google? This is the first time I've heard that. Can you
point me to any documentation for that conclusion?

In any case, I doubt that Microsoft is paying Google--a competitor--to return particular text
about one obscure page at Microsoft.com. That would imply that Microsoft maintains a huge
department that does nothing but write Google search results for Microsoft's 4,000,000+ web pages.
Besides, if Microsoft were doing something of the sort, it would be much easier if Google merely
agreed to display Microsoft's Description meta tag listing in all circumstances.

Instead, it's much more likely that Google has some very smart people who finally have learned how
to return key information from a page while ignoring menus.

Charley


Thomas A. Rowe said:
You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that was a paid placement vs.
standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Charley Kyd said:
Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's happening here.

Charley



Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid placement which the content
for the index is provide directly by the website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles,
tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"
SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033" ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the menu item isn't returned
with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from line 129, which is
32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't get
crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 4px;
padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's
clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" -- not "downloads" as I
asked for. The last section of the description begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to
that point, Google had to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in line
118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page descriptions? Or is
Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content the SE will still use
them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:

http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
That's not correct Tom. You cannot pay for inclusion in a search engine that
delivers traffic. Froogle is free to be listed in - you have to submit data
in a certain way but they don't take payments. Don't get me started on
froogle - let's just say google have a way of earning revenue from this but
it doesn't involve paying for inclusion.

If you have a good site of 10 pages or 10 million it's going to be spidered
and each page will gain a ranking on it's merits. Of course it takes time to
spider a big site but you can't short circuit the process by paying. The
Searchenginewatch.com article is nonsense. They generate revenue from giving
search engine "information" to people who don't know from experience how
search engines work. Read the article properly and then combine it with your
real world experience of generating search traffic

There's no way to buy a search engine ranking


--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

Thomas A. Rowe said:
I am not talking about paid/sponsored listing results, but paid inclusions.

Example: Take a large database driven site, there is no way that a search
engine spider is going to index the entire site, so the site would provide
the search engines with a flat file of the content to be included in the
index in whatever format the search engine requires for a fee

Currently Google offers a service called Froggle for indexing eCommerce
sites.

http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167941

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Jon Spivey said:
Yes you can. Google places the paid placments above and to the right of
natural listings, Overture places them above natural listings. In both
cases they're clearly labelled as sponsored results. You absolutely
cannot pay money to get a higher ranking.

--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

Thomas A. Rowe said:
You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that was
a paid placement vs. standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's
happening here.

Charley



Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid
placement which the content for the index is provide directly by the
website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips,
columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center
hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get
work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60"
BORDER="0" SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033"
ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the
menu item isn't returned with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office
Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing
the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download
today's clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from
Office Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes
from line 129, which is 32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office
for your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't
get crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top:
0px; padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right:
10px;"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up
"download" -- not "downloads" as I asked for. The last section of
the description begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to that
point, Google had to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu,
which begins in line 118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page
descriptions? Or is Microsoft doing something to cause Google to
ignore the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page
content the SE will still use them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:

http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side
menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly.
You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text
size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through
all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to
ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does
at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page,
their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu
text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can
anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach
deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
Jon,

See the following (2004), however the services may no longer be available.
http://www.high-search-engine-ranking.com/paid_inclusion_services.htm
--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Jon Spivey said:
That's not correct Tom. You cannot pay for inclusion in a search engine that delivers traffic.
Froogle is free to be listed in - you have to submit data in a certain way but they don't take
payments. Don't get me started on froogle - let's just say google have a way of earning revenue
from this but it doesn't involve paying for inclusion.

If you have a good site of 10 pages or 10 million it's going to be spidered and each page will
gain a ranking on it's merits. Of course it takes time to spider a big site but you can't short
circuit the process by paying. The Searchenginewatch.com article is nonsense. They generate
revenue from giving search engine "information" to people who don't know from experience how
search engines work. Read the article properly and then combine it with your real world experience
of generating search traffic

There's no way to buy a search engine ranking


--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

Thomas A. Rowe said:
I am not talking about paid/sponsored listing results, but paid inclusions.

Example: Take a large database driven site, there is no way that a search engine spider is going
to index the entire site, so the site would provide the search engines with a flat file of the
content to be included in the index in whatever format the search engine requires for a fee

Currently Google offers a service called Froggle for indexing eCommerce sites.

http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167941

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Jon Spivey said:
Yes you can. Google places the paid placments above and to the right of natural listings,
Overture places them above natural listings. In both cases they're clearly labelled as sponsored
results. You absolutely cannot pay money to get a higher ranking.

--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that was a paid placement vs.
standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's happening here.

Charley



Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid placement which the content
for the index is provide directly by the website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles,
tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"
SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033" ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the menu item isn't
returned with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from line 129, which is
32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't
get crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 4px;
padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's
clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" -- not "downloads" as I
asked for. The last section of the description begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get
to that point, Google had to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins in
line 118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page descriptions? Or is
Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content the SE will still
use them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:

http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
I see what you're saying but look at what those packages are actually
offering. Inclusion, not ranking. Meaning your site will attain the same
ranking it would have had if you hadn't paid. It just might get there
slightly quicker. If your site's good it may well get to number one and be
spidered regularly, but it would have done had you not paid. If your site's
lame it's going to appear on page 52 again whether or not you pay.

If your site is good the engines will want to spider it, rank it well and
revisit it regularly. A search engine's biggest revenue stream is from
selling PPC ads - the only way to sell ads is to gain consumers trust by
delivering the best, most relevant search results.


--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP




Thomas A. Rowe said:
Jon,

See the following (2004), however the services may no longer be available.
http://www.high-search-engine-ranking.com/paid_inclusion_services.htm
--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Jon Spivey said:
That's not correct Tom. You cannot pay for inclusion in a search engine
that delivers traffic. Froogle is free to be listed in - you have to
submit data in a certain way but they don't take payments. Don't get me
started on froogle - let's just say google have a way of earning revenue
from this but it doesn't involve paying for inclusion.

If you have a good site of 10 pages or 10 million it's going to be
spidered and each page will gain a ranking on it's merits. Of course it
takes time to spider a big site but you can't short circuit the process
by paying. The Searchenginewatch.com article is nonsense. They generate
revenue from giving search engine "information" to people who don't know
from experience how search engines work. Read the article properly and
then combine it with your real world experience of generating search
traffic

There's no way to buy a search engine ranking


--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

Thomas A. Rowe said:
I am not talking about paid/sponsored listing results, but paid
inclusions.

Example: Take a large database driven site, there is no way that a
search engine spider is going to index the entire site, so the site
would provide the search engines with a flat file of the content to be
included in the index in whatever format the search engine requires for
a fee

Currently Google offers a service called Froggle for indexing eCommerce
sites.

http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167941

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Yes you can. Google places the paid placments above and to the right of
natural listings, Overture places them above natural listings. In both
cases they're clearly labelled as sponsored results. You absolutely
cannot pay money to get a higher ranking.

--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that
was a paid placement vs. standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's
happening here.

Charley



Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid
placement which the content for the index is provide directly by the
website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips,
columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady:
(c) Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance
Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and quizzes that help
you get work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51"
HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"
SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033"
ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but
the menu item isn't returned with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office
Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me:
Choosing the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download
today's clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from
Office Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes
from line 129, which is 32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office
for your job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't
get crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top:
0px; padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right:
10px;"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up
"download" -- not "downloads" as I asked for. The last section of
the description begins on line 129, character 31,085. To get to
that point, Google had to skip over the "Downloads" text in the
menu, which begins in line 118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page
descriptions? Or is Microsoft doing something to cause Google to
ignore the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page
content the SE will still use them instead of your page content
for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:

http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the
problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side
menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines
are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly.
You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest
text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go
through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to
ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| >
http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does
at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page,
their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu
text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can
anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach
deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure
it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
Correct, I was never attempting to indicate that it had anything to do with ranking.

So based on the OP issue, which was trying understand how to have site content indexed without
include the navigation structure, which would only be possible when using a paid inclusion service,
where the site is submitting the content to be included in the index.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Jon Spivey said:
I see what you're saying but look at what those packages are actually offering. Inclusion, not
ranking. Meaning your site will attain the same ranking it would have had if you hadn't paid. It
just might get there slightly quicker. If your site's good it may well get to number one and be
spidered regularly, but it would have done had you not paid. If your site's lame it's going to
appear on page 52 again whether or not you pay.

If your site is good the engines will want to spider it, rank it well and revisit it regularly. A
search engine's biggest revenue stream is from selling PPC ads - the only way to sell ads is to
gain consumers trust by delivering the best, most relevant search results.


--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP




Thomas A. Rowe said:
Jon,

See the following (2004), however the services may no longer be available.
http://www.high-search-engine-ranking.com/paid_inclusion_services.htm
--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Jon Spivey said:
That's not correct Tom. You cannot pay for inclusion in a search engine that delivers traffic.
Froogle is free to be listed in - you have to submit data in a certain way but they don't take
payments. Don't get me started on froogle - let's just say google have a way of earning revenue
from this but it doesn't involve paying for inclusion.

If you have a good site of 10 pages or 10 million it's going to be spidered and each page will
gain a ranking on it's merits. Of course it takes time to spider a big site but you can't short
circuit the process by paying. The Searchenginewatch.com article is nonsense. They generate
revenue from giving search engine "information" to people who don't know from experience how
search engines work. Read the article properly and then combine it with your real world
experience of generating search traffic

There's no way to buy a search engine ranking


--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

I am not talking about paid/sponsored listing results, but paid inclusions.

Example: Take a large database driven site, there is no way that a search engine spider is
going to index the entire site, so the site would provide the search engines with a flat file
of the content to be included in the index in whatever format the search engine requires for a
fee

Currently Google offers a service called Froggle for indexing eCommerce sites.

http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167941

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

Yes you can. Google places the paid placments above and to the right of natural listings,
Overture places them above natural listings. In both cases they're clearly labelled as
sponsored results. You absolutely cannot pay money to get a higher ranking.

--
Cheers,
Jon
Microsoft MVP

You can not tell the difference between a search result listing that was a paid placement vs.
standard spider indexing.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Yes, but paid placement is a different category. That's not what's happening here.

Charley



Google, as well as other major search engines also allow for paid placement which the
content for the index is provide directly by the website and not the search engine spiders.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message

Hmmm...Not always.

Illustration 1
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office training

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page
Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to articles, tips, columns, and
quizzes that help you get work done using ... Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft ...

The title tag is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Assistance Home Page</TITLE>

And the Description is:
<meta name="Description" content="Microsoft Office Assistance Center hosts how-to
articles, tips, columns, and quizzes that help you get work done using Office programs.">

But the rest of Google's description comes from:
---------
Line 79: <TD CLASS="BOBSImg" VALIGN="center"><A
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100152241033&amp;Origin=HH100791741033&amp;CTT=5"
TITLE="Crabby Office Lady: (c) Microsoft"><IMG WIDTH="51" HEIGHT="60" BORDER="0"
SRC="/global/images/default.aspx?assetid=ZA010911451033" ALT="Crabby Office Lady: (c)
Microsoft"></A></TD>
--------

Notice that "Training" is a menu item--as text--on this page, but the menu item isn't
returned with Google's page description.


Illustration 2
========
Search Google for the words: crabby microsoft office downloads

The first listing I get is:

Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online
Microsoft Office for your job ... Don't get crabby with me: Choosing the Office
features you want · View this: Opening a file when ... Download today's clip ...

Again, the title is:
<TITLE>Microsoft Office Online: Crabby Office Lady columns from Office Online</TITLE>

But the remainder does NOT come from meta tags. Instead, it comes from line 129, which is
32,000 characters long:
------------
<TD CLASS="BOBListTitleCell"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Microsoft Office for your
job</SPAN></TD>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA100474471033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">Don't
get crabby with me: Choosing the Office features you want</A></LI>
...
<LI CLASS="OLstIN"><A CLASS="OAnc"
HREF="/search/redir.aspx?AssetID=HA012309001033&amp;Origin=HH010778061033&amp;CTT=5">View
this: Opening a file when you don't have the program</A></LI>
...
<TD WIDTH="100%" CLASS="RightNavBackgroundNew" STYLE="padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom:
4px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px;"><SPAN CLASS="OLblEm">Download today's
clip</SPAN></TD>
-----------

The key item of interest is where Google went to pick up "download" -- not "downloads" as
I asked for. The last section of the description begins on line 129, character 31,085. To
get to that point, Google had to skip over the "Downloads" text in the menu, which begins
in line 118, character 2558.

Has Google just gotten smarter about avoiding menu text in its page descriptions? Or is
Microsoft doing something to cause Google to ignore the menu items?

Charley




Server not found at ExcelUser.com
If you have description and title meta tags matching your page content the SE will still
use them instead of your page content for
summaries

--

_____________________________________________
SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
"Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:

http://www.frontpagemvps.com/FrontPageNewsGroups/tabid/53/Default.aspx
_____________________________________________


"Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
|
| Thanks, Tom, but I've changed the design since I had the problem.
|
| Instead, I played some tricks with tables to put the left-side menu below
| the content. That solution worked as far as the search engines are
| concerned, but when people use larger fonts the tables get ugly. You can see
| that problem if you go to ExcelUser.com and View the largest text size.
|
| So I'm looking at a full redesign, and I don't want to go through all of
| that work unless I can find some way to get search engines to ignore menu
| text when they summarize each page.
|
| Charley
|
|
| | >
| > Provide a URL to your page for us to look at.
| > --
| > ===
| > Tom [Pepper] Willett
| > Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
| > ---
| > FrontPage Support:
| > http://www.frontpagemvps.com/
| >
| > About FrontPage 2003:
| > http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
| > ===
| > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > |
| > | No. I don't use frames.
| > |
| > | Charley
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > They don't use frames. Are you?
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Murray
| > | > ============
| > | >
| > | > "Charley Kyd" <kyd at incsight dot com> wrote in message
| > | > | > | >>
| > | >> I used to have menus at the left, much as Microsoft does at:
| > | >> http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >>
| > | >> However, when Google returned information about a page, their
| > | >> descriptions of my pages often merely listed my menu text...which
| > | >> provided no useful information in the search results. Can anyone tell
| > me
| > | >> what Microsoft does to force the Google spider to reach deep into the
| > | >> html to return actual content, rather than menu text?
| > | >>
| > | >> Has anyone else had the problem I did? How did you cure it?
| > | >>
| > | >> Thanks.
| > | >>
| > | >> Charley
| > | >>
| > | >>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
 
The only thing I can do is to experiment. Today, I'll post half-a-dozen
pages that have the menus above the content. These menus should be easy to
identify and exclude, if Google is paying attention. In a couple of weeks
I'll see how the pages are indexed.

Charley
 
Back
Top