Has anyone heard of this program or used it - Iobit Security?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mark23
  • Start date Start date
The fact is David got caught stealing software and was shutdown for
it.
Click to expand...

Since I know that you are a liar, I will assume that that is a lie.
Yet it is acceptable to you because you believe his BS.
Click to expand...

I give him the benefit of the doubt because he has not demonstrated to
me that he is a liar like you have done.
My site has never been shutdown because I DON"T steal.
Click to expand...

It has been logically proven (with your participation) that you indeed
have taken credit for the work of others. In your lame attempts to
wriggle your way out of it, you proved yourself a liar as well - which
was no surprise really.

[...]
...but according to all these trolls who you believe 100% everything on
my site is stolen..
Click to expand...

I don't recall ever hearing anyone make that claim. I haven't any proof
of that. All I know is that more than 0% is the work of others, which
you have claimed as yours.
 
Yet mine is still up but according to all these trolls who you
believe 100% everything on my site is stolen..
Click to expand...

If you switched your hosting company to one that didn't require a court
order, one that just followed basic DMCA notices and proof, you would
have been down a long time ago.

You hosting provider clearly stated that they don't care what is on your
site unless THEY are presented with a court order to take your site
down.

Your hosting provider clearly stated that they only require you to
"Dispute", not prove, any claim against you, and they will ignore the
claim until a court order is produced.

Many vendors have posted in Usenet that you are not authorized to use
their code, host their files, and you've changed the names many times,
changed how you provide links, run around in circles to get around their
take-down-notices.

You are not fooling anyone with your lies and deceptions.

I notice how you're still STALKING ME - it shows in your account name,
using my name instead of your own.
 
From: "FromTheRafters" <[email protected]>


| Since I know that you are a liar, I will assume that that is a lie.


You are correct in your assumption.

I have not stolen anything and the ONLY voice to this effect you hear is Butts'.

The fact is a 'nym, without proof existence, filed a DMCA claim (3/23/'07) to the web site
provider (IPowerWeb) for Ian Kenefick's web site (IK-CS.Com) indicating that this 'nym had
created my Multi AV Scanning Tool, WinFixerFix, SmitFraud Fix and the WGET utility.

The fact is that my Multi AV is extremely unique in that it is written in KiXtart. There
are ZERO other anti malware utilities written in this interpreter. Additionally for well
over 15 years I have been a member of the KiXtart community and have collaborated with
them in the Multi AV Scanning Tool. However it was built upon previous work such as the
Trend Sysclean Front End and the McAfee Front End which were combined in what became the
Multi AV Scanning Tool. Additionally there were other anti malware scanners built around
the same core code that preceeded the Multi AV that was not in the DMCA complaint.

As an additional fact, the DMCA notification claimed...
"All three programs listed above use a utility called WGET.exe which belongs to me. I am
the author of that program and the website has No permission to use it. References to my
wget program can be found here"

The WGET utility is 100% free and freely distributable under the Free Software Foundation
and GNU public licenses and was *NEVER* authored by "Gregory Taylor, (e-mail address removed) "
which was the 'nym used in the DMCA Takedown Notification. Micah J. Cowan is the
maintainer of WGET.

The DMCA Takedown Notification was a fraudulent fabrication and the noted author "Gregory
Taylor, President and CEO, GT tools inc" doesn't even exist.

The above fraudulent act was indeed perpetrated by Butts in retaliation for me publicly
denouncing his plagiarism of other people's software and violations of their intellectual
property rights.
 
David H. Lipman said:
From: "FromTheRafters" <[email protected]>



| Since I know that you are a liar, I will assume that that is a lie.


You are correct in your assumption.

I have not stolen anything and the ONLY voice to this effect you hear
is Butts'.

The fact is a 'nym, without proof existence, filed a DMCA claim
(3/23/'07) to the web site
provider (IPowerWeb) for Ian Kenefick's web site (IK-CS.Com)
indicating that this 'nym had
created my Multi AV Scanning Tool, WinFixerFix, SmitFraud Fix and the
WGET utility.

The fact is that my Multi AV is extremely unique in that it is written
in KiXtart. There
are ZERO other anti malware utilities written in this interpreter.
Additionally for well
over 15 years I have been a member of the KiXtart community and have
collaborated with
them in the Multi AV Scanning Tool. However it was built upon
previous work such as the
Trend Sysclean Front End and the McAfee Front End which were combined
in what became the
Multi AV Scanning Tool. Additionally there were other anti malware
scanners built around
the same core code that preceeded the Multi AV that was not in the
DMCA complaint.

As an additional fact, the DMCA notification claimed...
"All three programs listed above use a utility called WGET.exe which
belongs to me. I am
the author of that program and the website has No permission to use
it. References to my
wget program can be found here"

The WGET utility is 100% free and freely distributable under the Free
Software Foundation
and GNU public licenses and was *NEVER* authored by "Gregory Taylor,
(e-mail address removed) "
which was the 'nym used in the DMCA Takedown Notification. Micah J.
Cowan is the
maintainer of WGET.

The DMCA Takedown Notification was a fraudulent fabrication and the
noted author "Gregory
Taylor, President and CEO, GT tools inc" doesn't even exist.

The above fraudulent act was indeed perpetrated by Butts in
retaliation for me publicly
denouncing his plagiarism of other people's software and violations of
their intellectual
property rights.
Click to expand...

....and besides that, Butts is *such* a crybaby. :oD

Thanks for taking the time to explain this in detail. I remember Ian
from these groups in past years.
 
From: "FromTheRafters" <[email protected]>

| ...and besides that, Butts is *such* a crybaby. :oD

| Thanks for taking the time to explain this in detail. I remember Ian
| from these groups in past years.

Within days of the DMCA Takedown notification, Ian's son Tom was born and he had no time
to deal with Butts' bullshit. He had filed a formal Counter Notification but it was
ignored. Presumably because he is a citizen of Cork Ireland and not the US. Because of
his new son, his need to buy a new house, etc., he did not take further action and the
site remained suspended and then it was ultimately shutdown.

http://www.iansblog.org/foto/index.php
 
Does not matter where he lives, all YOU had to do was prove that software
was not stolen and indeed yours, you could not because you stole it. Ian
trusted you, you fooled him like you are fooling everyone here except me.
Proving the software is yours is very easy. I have had 3 fraudulent DMCA
complaints filed against me perpetrated by you and beat them all because it
was proven by me that my software is MINE. You can bitch and complain all
you want it will NOT change the facts or bring your friends website back.
You tried real hard. You could have easily opened your own website and
continue to push your stolen crap but you knew that any website you try to
open in the USA will suffer the same fate. So you decided to have some
foreign site host your stolen crap because it is out of the jurisdiction of
US laws. That is what kind of scum you are.


--
The Real Truth http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspot.com/
*WARNING* Do NOT follow any advice given by the people listed below.
They do NOT have the expertise or knowledge to fix your issue. Do not waste
your time.
David H Lipman, Malke, PA Bear, Beauregard T. Shagnasty, Leythos.
 
I have had 3 fraudulent DMCA
complaints filed against me perpetrated by you and beat them all because it
was proven by me that my software is MINE.
Click to expand...

Actually, you've lied about this every time. Your hosting provider has
stated that you don't need to PROVE anything, they will only take action
against you by court order. They have said that they give you time to
"dispute" the claim, that you only need to say you dispute it, don't
need to prove anything, and that they will wait for a court order that
orders you/them to remove the work in question.

So, again, you've lied and anyone that wants can verify this with your
hosting provider.
 
From: "Leythos" <[email protected]>



| Actually, you've lied about this every time. Your hosting provider has
| stated that you don't need to PROVE anything, they will only take action
| against you by court order. They have said that they give you time to
| "dispute" the claim, that you only need to say you dispute it, don't
| need to prove anything, and that they will wait for a court order that
| orders you/them to remove the work in question.

| So, again, you've lied and anyone that wants can verify this with your
| hosting provider.

And they have been generated by REAL people with REAL software infringements.

I saw Robert A. Cooper's and it wasn't a case of fraud. His was legitimate. He formatted
his complaint wrong and complained about software infringements that were out of scope of
his own copyright infringement.

I also have seen Stuart's. His was formatted correctly and was in scope. That caused
SpyErase to become Remove-It. Compare both and anyone can see that they are the same.
However as you have noted Leythos the hosting company then indicated no further action
would be taken without a court order. An expensive proposition.
 
Leythos said:
Your hosting provider has
stated that you don't need to PROVE anything, they will only take action
against you by court order. They have said that they give you time to
"dispute" the claim, that you only need to say you dispute it, don't
need to prove anything, and that they will wait for a court order that
orders you/them to remove the work in question.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a company that is willing to support the position that their
customer gets a priori validity and if someone contests that, and has a
legitimate case (not just nymshit sniveling), they should be able to obtain
affirmation of their claim with a court order. What's wrong with that?
 
From: "ASCII" <[email protected]>


| Sounds like a company that is willing to support the position that their
| customer gets a priori validity and if someone contests that, and has a
| legitimate case (not just nymshit sniveling), they should be able to obtain
| affirmation of their claim with a court order. What's wrong with that?

Where was there "just nymshit sniveling" ?
 
My ISP followed the law. Leythos is pissed because they did follow the law
and not believe his dumbass. And he is wrong what he said in his post. By
law, and it is written in the DMCA that all complaints are handled by a
designated agent, my Isp's designated agent is their legal dept. You can't
just call up my ISP and speak to someone in the legal dept. I can't just say
I dispute something and that's the end of it until a lawsuit is filed. I had
to show proof to their attorney that the software was mine and so does the
complaining party. If I did not they would automatically shutdown my site.
In fact my site was down for approximately 1 hour until I showed them proof.
By law when a complaint if filed it is an immediate takedown until I show
proof or remove the offending content. The complainant then has 14 days to
file a formal complaint with the court. After the 14 days no matter what I
do or them the site goes back up. Any other DMCA complaints filed after that
for the same content is ignored without a court order. I have script running
on my site that notifies my if the site goes down. I knew it went down and
immediately disputed it and gave my ISP proof the site went back up and has
been up every since. They did try to file two more DMCA complaint but they
failed for reasons stated above. they then went after Giganews and failed
there too. $46 is all it costs to file a complaint with the court yet no one
has done that simply because they are trolls and have no proof I stole
anything because I did not. Yet David's site was down in a matter of minutes
permanently. He never says but I bet whoever filed that complaint had proof
like I did, David knew he stole it so he just said **** it I'll but it up
somewhere else and that is exactly what he did.



--
The Real Truth http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspot.com/
*WARNING* Do NOT follow any advice given by the people listed below.
They do NOT have the expertise or knowledge to fix your issue. Do not waste
your time.
David H Lipman, Malke, PA Bear, Beauregard T. Shagnasty, Leythos.
 
[...waaaa - waaaa]
$46 is all it costs to file a complaint with the court yet no one has
done that simply because...
Click to expand...

You aren't worth the expenditure. You're just a joke.

Not being worth 46 dollars doesn't make you not a lying thief.

[snipped more crying]

You could conceivably prove that others have stolen from you - you need
only place a marker in your software and make it known to those you wish
to convince - and then demonstrate that it *later* appears in the
software you claim was stolen from you

If you recall, that is what happened to *you* a short time ago.

You still believe that you can always cover your lies with more lies,
but nothing will undo the proof we already have. The proposed
demonstration above will never happen because it requires that
information flows in a particular direction - and can't just be
fabricated by another of your complex lies.
 
My ISP followed the law. Leythos is pissed because they did follow the law
and not believe his dumbass. And he is wrong what he said in his post. By
law, and it is written in the DMCA that all complaints are handled by a
designated agent, my Isp's designated agent is their legal dept. You can't
just call up my ISP and speak to someone in the legal dept. I can't just say
I dispute something and that's the end of it until a lawsuit is filed. I had
to show proof to their attorney that the software was mine and so does the
complaining party.
Click to expand...

Wrong, several of us talked with the hosting company you use - they
clearly stated that ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS DISPUTE, NOT PROVE, THE CLAIM
AGAINST YOU.
 
From: "Leythos" <[email protected]>



| Wrong, several of us talked with the hosting company you use - they
| clearly stated that ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS DISPUTE, NOT PROVE, THE CLAIM
| AGAINST YOU.

You notice that while we can directly point to exactly what he plagiarized and from whom,
he continues to to be generic in his blatant defamation on me.

The whole DMCA Takedown notification to IPowerWeb was as PHONY as the sub-statement
fraudulent claim to the GNU WGET utilty !
 
Good for them! Any outfit such as Malwarebytes who endangers trusting
customers by employing a p.o.s like virus-writing RAID deserves to be
put out of business before this p.o.s RAID can - and will - inevitably
sneak in one of his virus dumps and destroy the comps of more innocent
users.
Click to expand...

Such a wonderful demonstration of sheer stupidity.. :)
You seriously need a life.. haha
 
Back
Top