HDDs are very reliable per usage hour. They suck at reliability per
age hour. Not a good idea. You might loose a disk after some years
in storage completely, as they are only designed for a shelf-life
of 5 years.
They dont. But the bearings and the electronics do and you might not
have a computer left they work in.
Look at MOD. 3.5" MOD for this. That is presently the only storage
solution designed for long-term storage. Nothing else is suitable for
long-term storage at the moment. This still constantly surptises me,
but that is just how it is. The obnly other option for long
term storage is to copy the data every few years and to keep
several copies.
The media are rated for 30+ years. Contrary to CD-R they actually
reach and exceed that number. What is more important is that the
drive manufacturers commit to their drives at least reading the
previous media generation. Media come in 2.3GB, 1.3GB, 640/540MB,
230MB and 128MB sizes (the smaller the older). You cannot get 128MB
media today. they must be something like 15 years old by now. Yet
still all current 3.5" MO drives read and write them.
In many places in Europe they are used to store digital X-rays (have
to be kept available for 20 years). They are also widely used in Japan,
I am told. Maybe the Japanese just take a longer term view on data
storage.
Another benefit is that the media are relativevely cheap (not
compared to low-end unreliable consumer grade trash like cd-r,
of course), while drives are more expensive.
You can get MOD libraries, where a feeder mechanism feeds few
drives from a large MO disk storage.
Some more info here:
http://www.fcpa.fujitsu.com/products/mo-drives/
For the larger 5.25" drives:
http://www.storagebysony.com/OEM/categories/categorymain.asp?id=5#
Some price quotes, including MOD jukeboxes:
http://www.mysimon.com/4007-3213_8-0.html
I am sure that Fujitsu, HP, Sony, Compaq (I think),...
will give you more detailed Information, when you explain
your needs to them.
Arno