A
Alias
Borne said:Yeah it is.
You just don't have a clue.
By George, you're right! That said, so ****ing what?
Alias
Borne said:Yeah it is.
You just don't have a clue.
Mike said:And as Adobe will not fix the problem immediately, now would be a good
time to dump Adobe Reader for Foxit, yes?
Alias said:With that logic, now would be a good time to dump Windows for Ubuntu, yes?
Alias
Mike said:And as Adobe will not fix the problem immediately, now would be a good
time to dump Adobe Reader for Foxit, yes?
TomV said:I don't have a preference as to which application a user chooses to use.
That's not the issue. If there's a security vulnerability in an
application (or an OS), people need to be informed. Your comment about
the flaw requiring "conditions...beyond reasonable use..." to be exploited
was dismissive (and inaccurate). Some users may prefer to wait for a
patch from Adobe rather than change applications, but at least they can do
so knowing the potential risk.
I don't always agree with Alias, but I do in this case that your logic is
flawed. Do you recall the WMF exploit? Microsoft sat on its hands for
quite some time on that one to the point that non-MS vendors issued
patches to protect users while MS got its act together. Using your logic,
everyone should have switched to another OS.
At least Adobe acknowledged the problem and took some action.
http://blogs.adobe.com/psirt/
Mike said:That would be a complete over reaction
Mike said:They didn't sit on their hands. They put out a work around almost
immediately, and others created patches which would stop the exploit.
Microsoft released an official patch for it five days before the date
that they had set..
Mike Hall - MVP said:And as Adobe will not fix the problem immediately, now would be a good time
to dump Adobe Reader for Foxit, yes?
TomV said:Clearly we have a difference of opinion. So be it.
Mike said:And as Adobe will not fix the problem immediately, now would be a good
time to dump Adobe Reader for Foxit, yes?