Frontpage 2003 Tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jerry
  • Start date Start date
But Jim those are steps that we should not have to take. Especially when MS
was aware of the problem early in the beta cycle.

Even a company man such as yourself would have to agree with that!
 
Brian G. said:
I use a 17" monitor. If I use anything other than 800 by 600 I also have
trouble reading the text.

Well, I've seen 19" monitors for less than $250. 21-22" monitors are
$450 and up but if that's what you need to do your job, I don't think
it's prohibitive.

Right now, I'm running 1280x1024 on a 21" monitor. At home I run
1152x768 on a 19" monitor. I know some people run more pixels on those
size screens, and some less. Personal preference surely rules.

I can tell you, though, that working on an 800x600 pixel desktop would
slow me down terribly. Whatever size monitor I needed to run at least
1024x768 would be worth it, and not just to display the Table
Properties dialog box.

All of which notwithstanding, the FrontPage 2003 System Requirements
posted at
http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/frontpage/sysreq.asp
state:
Display: Super VGA (800 × 600) or a higher-resolution monitor
so unless that changes, any dialog box taller than 570 pixels is a
remarkably bug-like feature.

Jim Buyens
Microsoft FrontPage MVP
(e-mail address removed)
http://www.interlacken.com
Author of:
*------------------------------------------------------*
|\----------------------------------------------------/|
|| Microsoft Office FrontPage 2003 Inside Out ||
|| Microsoft FrontPage Version 2002 Inside Out ||
|| Web Database Development Step by Step .NET Edition ||
|| Troubleshooting Microsoft FrontPage 2002 ||
|| Faster Smarter Beginning Programming ||
|| (All from Microsoft Press) ||
|/----------------------------------------------------\|
*------------------------------------------------------*
 
Most of the responses on this thread would hate my primary machine since its
a laptop with 1400x1050 on a 15" panel. I had to break down and get a pair
of reading glasses to work on it comfortably. I tried dropping the
resolution down but the LCD is factory optimized for this resolution and
anything else gets fuzzy.

Dell comes with a factory default of 1600x1200 on the same physical size
monitor. Now when I use the Mac that has a 15" digital flat panel the text
seems huge at 1024x768 and all I can think of is the "missing" screen real
estate but that's the max resolution so I'm stuck with it.
 
FYI
The reason that dialog had to stay that size was to support the "text" in all the multilingual versions of FP
--




| > Don't tell me MS will release 2003 without fixing this? This was reported
| > from the beta 2 at least twice that I saw here. I thought roughly 1/2 of the
| > monitors now in use were using 800 by 600 resolution.
| > | > > Unfortunately, no, you can't resize the Table Properties dialog box. It's
| > > 623 pixels tall, which is certainly a nuisance if your monitor resolution
| > > is 800x600 or less.
|
| The "shipping" release of FrontPage 2003 has been available for
| download by MSDN subscribers for about two weeks now, and the Table
| Properties dialog box is 623 pixels tall. I suppose that the software
| that shows up in stores could be different, but that's not likely.
|
| Microsoft certainly could have rearranged the elements on this dialog
| box to make it make the 570 pixels tall, and I personally wish they
| had. But even if half the Web visitors in the world have 800x600
| display systems, I suspect there aren't very many Web designers who
| work at less than 1024x768.
|
| The standard FrontPage window arrangement includes several toolbars at
| the top, a row of tabs and a status bar at the bottom, the Folder list
| at the left, and a task pane at the right. If you display all this on
| an 800x600 video system, you're going to have a postage stamp sized
| area for editing. And switching among FrontPage, a picture editor, and
| a couple of browser windows will be a nightmare.
|
| So really, any Web designer who runs his or her video system at
| 800x600 probably ought to be considering an upgrade for many reasons,
| and not just because of the Table Properties dialog box.
|
| As to cost, I just ran a quick check and found dozens of brand-new 17"
| monitors, with display capabilities up to 1280x1024, for sale at less
| than $125.
|
| Jim Buyens
| Microsoft FrontPage MVP
| (e-mail address removed)
| http://www.interlacken.com
| Author of:
| *------------------------------------------------------*
| |\----------------------------------------------------/|
| || Microsoft Office FrontPage 2003 Inside Out ||
| || Microsoft FrontPage Version 2002 Inside Out ||
| || Web Database Development Step by Step .NET Edition ||
| || Troubleshooting Microsoft FrontPage 2002 ||
| || Faster Smarter Beginning Programming ||
| || (All from Microsoft Press) ||
| |/----------------------------------------------------\|
| *------------------------------------------------------*
 
That is no excuse, IMHO. It could have been broken down into tabbed property
pages. This was just a oversight from MS.
--
Mike -- FrontPage MVP '97-'02
http://www.websunlimited.com
FrontPage Add-ins Since '97 2003 / 2002 / 2000 Compatible
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
If you think I'm doing a good job, let MS know at (e-mail address removed)



Stefan B Rusynko said:
FYI
The reason that dialog had to stay that size was to support the "text" in
all the multilingual versions of FP
 
If reading glasses are being used then that means that the laptop must be at
books length ( 12'' ) from you at all times. With a regular monitor you'd be
leaning in at all times.
--
Mike -- FrontPage MVP '97-'02
http://www.websunlimited.com
FrontPage Add-ins Since '97 2003 / 2002 / 2000 Compatible
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
If you think I'm doing a good job, let MS know at (e-mail address removed)


Cheryl D. Wise said:
Most of the responses on this thread would hate my primary machine since its
a laptop with 1400x1050 on a 15" panel. I had to break down and get a pair
of reading glasses to work on it comfortably. I tried dropping the
resolution down but the LCD is factory optimized for this resolution and
anything else gets fuzzy.

Dell comes with a factory default of 1600x1200 on the same physical size
monitor. Now when I use the Mac that has a 15" digital flat panel the text
seems huge at 1024x768 and all I can think of is the "missing" screen real
estate but that's the max resolution so I'm stuck with it.
 
Back
Top