G
Gerry Hickman
Hi Jim,
Well I was in the initial BETA tester group for .NET and have been using
ASP.NET ever since, but not with .NET 2.0
We've just putting a test suite together for Win2003, SharePoint, .NET
2.0 and VS.NET 2005 team builder.
I did ask two of our developers to test using Frontpage 2003 as a
replacement for VS.NET 2003 for two hours, including remote web server
debugging over DCOM. The comments that came back probably can't be
repeated on here![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/custom/smilies/smile.gif)
Part of the problem with this type of comparison though, is that there's
not many people that have used both Frontpage _and_ VS.NET for web
development. For example if we posted this discussion over on the .NET
groups they would instantly dismiss Frontpage as a development tool, but
probably for the wrong reasons.
As for FP not being a suitable application, I suspect (based upon your other
comments in this post and in others) that you know next to nothing about the
architecture of ASP.NET, so I wouldn't consider you a valid source for that.
Well I was in the initial BETA tester group for .NET and have been using
ASP.NET ever since, but not with .NET 2.0
We've just putting a test suite together for Win2003, SharePoint, .NET
2.0 and VS.NET 2005 team builder.
I did ask two of our developers to test using Frontpage 2003 as a
replacement for VS.NET 2003 for two hours, including remote web server
debugging over DCOM. The comments that came back probably can't be
repeated on here
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/custom/smilies/smile.gif)
Part of the problem with this type of comparison though, is that there's
not many people that have used both Frontpage _and_ VS.NET for web
development. For example if we posted this discussion over on the .NET
groups they would instantly dismiss Frontpage as a development tool, but
probably for the wrong reasons.